Add redirect::Policy::none to wasm client

[ostenbom]

Solves #2071

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Request/redirect

This PR keeps the default fetch redirect functionality as-is (it doesn't set anything, and therefore "follow" is used).

In order to support "manual", we use the Policy::none() interface that does the same thing as the other clients "disables all redirect behaviour".

I deliberately omitted the error kind, since no error interface existed in the current redirect::Policy struct.

Let me know if there's anything else to be improved, thanks!

[seanmonstar]

Does this actually return a Response type? When I read through the fetch spec, it sounded like this returns an error with things like status: 0 and such.

[swfsql]

To add info on this - in case someone is trying to customize the following on redirects - I naively thought that manual would allow me to "manually" follow the redirects but the fetch API instead just return a response without any data (without the redirection location - so I think the return is not useful in case you do want to follow the redirection in a custom way?).

Found those discussions for the fetch api:

• Header to opt out of opaque redirect whatwg/fetch#601
• Cannot get next URL for redirect="manual" whatwg/fetch#763

[ostenbom]

Interesting that there seems to be some differences in implementations here 😅

async function fetchRedirect() {
  const response = await fetch("https://mock.httpstatus.io/307");
  // This will be 200
  console.log({
    status: response.status,
    location: response.headers.get("location"),
  });
  const responseManual = await fetch("https://mock.httpstatus.io/307", {
    redirect: "manual",
  });
  // This will be 307
  console.log({
    status: responseManual.status,
    location: responseManual.headers.get("location"),
  });
}

(async () => {
  await fetchRedirect();
})();

• When I run this in the node, I get a status 307 on the response + the correct location
• When I run it in the browser (chrome) I get the status 0 thing
• When I run this in rust / with this commit + reqwest, I can successfully proxy the 307 status codes, so that the redirects are not followed (no status code 0, no problems with response objects)

I wonder if this could have to do with me running this on cloudflare workers, and that it's cloudflare's implementation of fetch that's allowing this to work?

At the same time it feels strange that this behaviour isn't supported by the fetch spec.. Where do we go from here? Do the implementation differences make this harder to support?

[seanmonstar]

Just checking in here: I don't think we can add this, at least not yet. Unless there's a consistent way for us to check if it's a facade and we can translate it so that the behavior is the same. If not, probably need to close.