-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 859
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve: RpcInvokeCallbackListener resolve response #336
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
WalkthroughThe recent changes encompass a variety of improvements and additions across multiple files, focusing on enhancing callback handling, updating dependencies, refining connection status checks, and adding new test cases. Key modifications include refactoring the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant RpcCommandHandler
participant RemotingContext
participant ProcessMethod
User->>RpcCommandHandler: Invoke run()
RpcCommandHandler->>RemotingContext: Clone ctx
RpcCommandHandler->>ProcessMethod: Call process(ctx.clone(), m)
ProcessMethod-->>RpcCommandHandler: Return result
RpcCommandHandler-->>User: Return response
Poem
Warning Review ran into problemsProblems (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java (1)
136-147
: Ensure thread safety when modifying the response object.synchronized (response) { Object responseObj = RpcResponseResolver.resolveResponseObject(response, this.remoteAddress); response.setInvokeContext(future.getInvokeContext()); callback.onResponse(responseObj); }This modification ensures that changes to the response object are thread-safe, which is crucial in a multi-threaded environment.
src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
206f2e4
to
f6dd49e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java
a22ee85
to
8187102
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java
It's amazing, I feel like this CI will randomly fail |
c84504c
to
8187102
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
- pom.xml (5 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/BaseRemoting.java (2 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/Connection.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/InvokeContext.java (3 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/RemotingContext.java (3 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/protocol/RpcCommandHandler.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/protocol/RpcRequestProcessor.java (4 hunks)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/serialization/SerializerManager.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/alipay/remoting/inner/connection/ConnectionTest.java (2 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/exception/ExceptionTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/protocol/RpcCommandHandlerTest.java (1 hunks)
- src/test/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/serializer/ClassCustomSerializerTest.java (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/release.yml
- pom.xml
Additional comments not posted (20)
src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/serialization/SerializerManager.java (2)
19-19
: Import and declaration ofReentrantLock
are appropriate for ensuring thread safety.Also applies to: 37-37
40-53
: Thread safety improvements ingetSerializer
method are correctly implemented usingReentrantLock
.src/test/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/protocol/RpcCommandHandlerTest.java (2)
55-71
: The new test methodtestHandleCommand
is well-structured and correctly tests command handling with asynchronous behavior.
73-143
: TheMockUserProcessors
class is correctly implemented and serves its purpose in the test setup.src/test/java/com/alipay/remoting/inner/connection/ConnectionTest.java (1)
128-133
: The new test methodtestIsFine
correctly tests the connection's fine-check logic after closing the connection.src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/InvokeContext.java (3)
76-85
: Addition ofRecordContext
field and its initialization in the constructor are correctly implemented to enhance functionality.
137-137
: Changes to theclear
method, including resetting theRecordContext
, are appropriate for ensuring consistency in the state ofInvokeContext
.
146-148
: ThegetRecordContext
method is correctly implemented to provide access to theRecordContext
field.src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/RemotingContext.java (2)
121-131
: The addition ofwrite
andflush
methods inRemotingContext
correctly abstracts lower-level channel operations, enhancing the usability of the class.
260-262
: Theclone
method inRemotingContext
is correctly implemented to provide a shallow copy of the context, suitable for its intended use.src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/protocol/RpcCommandHandler.java (1)
108-108
: Cloning thectx
object inRpcCommandHandler
before processing commands is a crucial change for ensuring that the original context remains unaltered, enhancing thread safety.src/test/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/exception/ExceptionTest.java (1)
345-365
: The new test methodtestGetBizClassLoaderException1
effectively tests the exception handling whengetBizClassLoader
throws aRuntimeException
. This is a good addition to ensure robustness in error scenarios.src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/Connection.java (1)
160-160
: The addition of the!closed.get()
condition in theisFine
method is a crucial improvement. It ensures that the connection's closed state is checked along with its active state, which is essential for accurate connection health checks.src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/BaseRemoting.java (1)
44-47
: The change from a private to a protectedcommandFactory
and its initialization in the constructor enhances the flexibility and extensibility of theBaseRemoting
class. This allows subclasses to directly access and utilize thecommandFactory
, which is a good design decision for future enhancements and customizations.src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/protocol/RpcRequestProcessor.java (4)
23-25
: The addition of imports forRecordContext
,RecordScene
, andRecorderManager
indicates an enhancement in the monitoring or logging capabilities of theRpcRequestProcessor
. This is a positive change as it likely supports more detailed or context-aware logging or metrics collection.
137-156
: The introduction of recording logic usingRecorderManager
in thedoProcess
method is a significant enhancement. It allows for detailed tracking and analysis of request handling, which can be crucial for performance tuning and debugging. The use oftry-finally
ensures that recording stops even if an exception occurs, which is a good practice for maintaining accurate metrics.
193-198
: The nested try-catch block inside the catch for serialization exceptions ensures that even if serialization of the exception response fails, the error is logged. This is a robust error handling strategy that prevents loss of error information, crucial for diagnosing issues in production environments.
415-419
: The detailed error logging and response handling in theProcessTask
class'srun
method is well-implemented. It ensures that any exceptions during the processing of RPC requests are not only logged with detailed context but also communicated back to the caller, enhancing the reliability and debuggability of the system.src/test/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/serializer/ClassCustomSerializerTest.java (2)
23-23
: Added imports forAtomicBoolean
,DefaultCustomSerializer
,ResponseCommand
,InvokeServerException
, andRpcServerException
.These imports are necessary for the new test method
testResponseSerialThrowable
to function correctly.Also applies to: 25-28
309-346
: New test methodtestResponseSerialThrowable
added to handle serialization exceptions for response objects.This test method effectively checks the serialization process by intentionally throwing a
StackOverflowError
to simulate an error scenario. It's a good practice to include such robustness tests. However, ensure that theStackOverflowError
is a deliberate choice for simulating serialization errors, as it typically indicates very different issues (such as infinite recursion).
8187102
to
9f4499e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/main/java/com/alipay/remoting/rpc/RpcInvokeCallbackListener.java
这个CI有问题,线下跑的单测没问题,CI跑的就报错 CI: |
Why make this change?
The code for resolve response is duplicated。
replace duplicated code by using
RpcResponseResolver.resolveResponseObject
methodSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
RemotingContext
instances.Bug Fixes
isFine()
method inConnection
to properly check the closed status.Improvements
CallbackTask
class to enhance exception handling, error messages, and callback invocation logic.pom.xml
for improved stability and performance.BaseRemoting
for better clarity.SerializerManager
.Tests