Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rework system tables #548

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 19, 2023
Merged

Rework system tables #548

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 19, 2023

Conversation

hfhbd
Copy link
Collaborator

@hfhbd hfhbd commented Aug 8, 2023

I dislike the (my) current implementation of system tables. We should use the baseContributorFiles method instead.

Copy link
Collaborator

@AlecKazakova AlecKazakova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good with the downstream sqldelight changes. I'll wait until changes have landed in that PR and its approved and then I'll merge this / update sql-psi

@hfhbd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hfhbd commented Oct 18, 2023

I will update this PR to reflect the lazy psi file creating.

I am fine with both merge strategies, either sqldelight or sql-psi first, but keep in mind the tests in sqldelight will fail until there is a new sql-psi release.

@AlecKazakova AlecKazakova merged commit 3144c1f into master Oct 19, 2023
2 checks passed
@AlecKazakova AlecKazakova deleted the hfhbd/reworkSystemTables branch October 19, 2023 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants