Skip to content

enable clarity-wasm for all epochs #6075

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 225 commits into
base: feat/clarity-wasm-develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

csgui
Copy link

@csgui csgui commented May 5, 2025

Remove epoch gate for clarity-wasm. This is need to validate clarity-wasm behaviour against all mined blocks since genesis.

jferrant and others added 30 commits March 28, 2025 13:43
…dates table to signerdb

Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
…stacks-core into feat/signer-state-conflict-resolution-strategies
… into feat/signer-state-conflict-resolution-strategies
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
… into feat/signer-state-conflict-resolution-strategies
…fork and mark_miner_as_invalid_if_reorg_is_rejected

Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
… into feat/signer-state-conflict-resolution-strategies
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
… into feat/signer-state-conflict-resolution-strategies
This defines a time that the miner should sleep after attempting to mine
and finding an empty mempool.
Include the `empty_mempool_sleep_time` in the time that the test sleeps
since it is likely that the miner will be waiting before mining the
block.
… all global eval functions take the local address and local update

Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jacinta Ferrant <[email protected]>
obycode
obycode previously approved these changes May 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@obycode obycode left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not carefully review the merge of develop, but the change to enable clarity wasm for all epochs looks good.

Acaccia
Acaccia previously approved these changes May 7, 2025
@obycode
Copy link
Contributor

obycode commented May 7, 2025

Merging is blocked
Commits must have verified signatures.

@csgui, you'll need to update your environment to sign commits. This is our new policy on stacks-core.

move CODEOWNERS and adjust requirements to automatically add multiple…
@csgui csgui enabled auto-merge May 7, 2025 18:10
@csgui csgui disabled auto-merge May 7, 2025 18:44
@csgui csgui force-pushed the feat/clarity-wasm-develop branch 2 times, most recently from 6335493 to e588485 Compare May 8, 2025 09:26
@csgui csgui dismissed stale reviews from obycode and Acaccia via 6284320 May 8, 2025 09:33
@csgui csgui force-pushed the feat/clarity-wasm-develop branch from e588485 to 6284320 Compare May 8, 2025 09:33
@csgui csgui force-pushed the feat/clarity-wasm-develop branch from 6284320 to 1045af1 Compare May 8, 2025 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants