Skip to content

Conversation

jferrant
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

jferrant and others added 30 commits September 18, 2025 09:19
This just adds the basic support for the syntax and some setup for the
full implementation.
That infrastructure is not setup for handling PoX state, and the
stacking tracking in the asset maps is not setup yet any way.
We decided to remove this because it doesn't really make sense.
@jferrant jferrant requested a review from fdefelici October 14, 2025 11:58
@jferrant jferrant requested review from a team as code owners October 14, 2025 11:58
Jiloc
Jiloc previously approved these changes Oct 14, 2025
fdefelici
fdefelici previously approved these changes Oct 14, 2025
jferrant and others added 15 commits October 14, 2025 16:31
…ing-blocks-db-access

Make access to Nakamoto staging blocks restricted to one single pub fn
…sus-test-api

feat: add macros for contract consensus tests
…-invalid-pox-call-invalid-block

Remove unreachable error type and use existing Expect error to ensure invalid block
…llformed-tenure-fns

Make is_wellformed_tenure_*_block return Error and remove custom conversions
… into chore/merge-develop-to-aac-client-breaking
…contract-consensus-test

feat: contract consensus test dynamic nonce update
… into chore/merge-develop-to-aac-client-breaking
@jferrant jferrant dismissed stale reviews from fdefelici and Jiloc via 54f800b October 17, 2025 11:45
@jferrant jferrant requested review from Jiloc and fdefelici October 17, 2025 11:45
@federico-stacks federico-stacks self-requested a review October 17, 2025 13:21
Comment on lines +486 to +494
// contract post-conditions
ExpectedListOfAllowances(String, i32),
AllowanceExprNotAllowed,
ExpectedAllowanceExpr(String),
WithAllAllowanceNotAllowed,
WithAllAllowanceNotAlone,
WithNftExpectedListOfIdentifiers,
MaxIdentifierLengthExceeded(u32, u32),
TooManyAllowances(usize, usize),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We'll need to document these too :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants