-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle non-numeric metric values #21
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Owen <[email protected]>
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Thanks for the PR. |
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Owen <[email protected]>
f15637d
to
43dc708
Compare
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Owen <[email protected]>
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/YammerMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Owen <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the updates. I made another pass and left a few more comments.
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
labels = new HashMap<>(); | ||
labels.put("key", "value"); | ||
} | ||
private final Map<String, String> labels = Map.of("key", "value"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since you're making this change here, do you want to do the same in YammerMetricsCollectorTest? as it has the exact same code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We decided to keep as is because the ordering is clear
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the reply doesn't really make sense, but I'm not too worried either way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, wrong place for my last comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd still prefer to use the same logic in both KafkaMetricsCollectorTest
and YammerMetricsCollectorTest
. So either we revert this, or we do the same in YammerMetricsCollectorTest
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://github.com/strimzi/metrics-reporter/pull/21/files#r1644743277 has not been addressed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I missed this comment somehow. To keep uniformity, I will revert KafkaMetricsReporter
to the former logic.
In trying to implement private final LinkedHashMap<String, String> tags = new LinkedHashMap<>(Map.of("key", "value", "key2", "value2"));
, while the LinkedHashMap provided ordering guarantee, I think the Map.of method creates an immutable map, and using it directly to initialize a mutable LinkedHashMap might cause issues in some cases, causing the test to fail sometimes.
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/YammerMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/YammerMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/YammerMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/YammerMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
d3cb71a
to
00e23c9
Compare
Signed-off-by: Owen <[email protected]>
00e23c9
to
232c363
Compare
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/YammerMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/YammerMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Owen <[email protected]>
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/YammerMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couple of nits, but I think this is looking close now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the updates. I made a another pass and left a few comments.
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollector.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
labels = new HashMap<>(); | ||
labels.put("key", "value"); | ||
} | ||
private final Map<String, String> labels = Map.of("key", "value"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd still prefer to use the same logic in both KafkaMetricsCollectorTest
and YammerMetricsCollectorTest
. So either we revert this, or we do the same in YammerMetricsCollectorTest
.
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/KafkaMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/io/strimzi/kafka/metrics/YammerMetricsCollectorTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
assertEquals("kafka_server_group_name", metricFamilySamples.name); | ||
assertEquals(1, metricFamilySamples.samples.size()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These 2 assertions are checked again in assertMetricFamilySample()
. Why are we checking them twice?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Duplicates removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be more idiomatic to either check the size in assertMetricFamilySample()
, or pass the unique sample (metricFamilySamples.samples.get(0)
) to assertMetricFamilySample()
.
It's weird to check the sample size is one and still pass the list of samples to assertMetricFamilySample()
.
Same in YammerMetricsCollectorTest
.
Signed-off-by: Owen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Owen <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thank you @OwenCorrigan76
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be great if you could provide a bit more details in the Pr description about what and how it does.
LOG.info("Kafka metric {} is allowed", name); | ||
LOG.info("labels " + metricName.tags()); | ||
MetricFamilySamples sample = convert(name, metricName.description(), kafkaMetric, metricName.tags()); | ||
LOG.info("Kafka metric {} is allowed", prometheusMetricName); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this was already here. But do we really need this on INFO level? Maybe DEBUG would be enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes we plan to address this in #6
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the updates, I think we're almost there. I left a few small suggestions.
|
||
/** | ||
* Helper class to convert Kafka metrics into the Prometheus format. | ||
*/ | ||
public class MetricFamilySamplesBuilder { | ||
|
||
private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(KafkaMetricsCollector.class.getName()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
KafkaMetricsCollector
-> MetricFamilySamplesBuilder
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Silly mistake. Fixed
labels = new HashMap<>(); | ||
labels.put("key", "value"); | ||
} | ||
private final Map<String, String> labels = Map.of("key", "value"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://github.com/strimzi/metrics-reporter/pull/21/files#r1644743277 has not been addressed
assertEquals("kafka_server_group_name", metricFamilySamples.name); | ||
assertEquals(1, metricFamilySamples.samples.size()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be more idiomatic to either check the size in assertMetricFamilySample()
, or pass the unique sample (metricFamilySamples.samples.get(0)
) to assertMetricFamilySample()
.
It's weird to check the sample size is one and still pass the list of samples to assertMetricFamilySample()
.
Same in YammerMetricsCollectorTest
.
@@ -90,8 +113,8 @@ private KafkaMetric buildMetric(String name, String group, double value) { | |||
time); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
private KafkaMetric buildNonNumericMetric(String name, String group) { | |||
Gauge<String> measurable = (config, now) -> "hello"; | |||
private KafkaMetric buildNonNumericMetric(String name, String group, String nonNumericValue) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: this can be just value
. It's type String
, so we know it's not numeric.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refactored
Signed-off-by: Owen <[email protected]>
@scholzj Is the PR description better? Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for implementing this feature and addressing all the comments!
There are still a couple of things not quite right in the tests (for example we access the first item before checking the collection size is 1 in assertMetricFamilySample()
) but we can address them in follow up PRs.
LGTM
Prometheus only supports numeric values for metrics. A few metrics emitted by Kafka brokers and clients have non-numeric values. This PR will move the non-numeric value to a label and then and set its value to 1.0, to satisfy Prometheus only supporting numeric values.
Reported in the following issue:
#8