-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
Add satruation adjustment command. #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Bobbsterman
wants to merge
4
commits into
sylikc:master
Choose a base branch
from
Bobbsterman:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2b3b868
Attempting to add a satruation adjustment command. Modified KeyMap ac…
Bobbsterman cc1dbda
Quick fix: I forgot to define the IDM_SATURATION_INC and IDM_SATURATI…
Bobbsterman 61067cd
Bug fix: the minimum and maximum for the AdjustSaturation command wer…
Bobbsterman 821f8d3
Fixed a shortcut conflict I created when I remapped the Sharpen incre…
Bobbsterman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so this is a reassignment of the keys from sharpen to saturation right?
I would prefer making saturation (new feature) assign the new key rather than changing the older one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's right.
Yea, I thought about just using a new shortcut, but thought it would be better to instead keep the shortcuts more consistent? Each one of the 3 modifier keys controls one of the 3 editing sliders on the left of the editing panel. I thought the sharpen slider was really of a different category (since it doesn't actually edit the photo, but instead is just a filter when viewing the image) and therefore should have a distinct type of shortcut. I thought that would be a more intuitive user experience? But I don't have strong feelings about this – I'll let you decide which way to go on this.