chore: bump deps | wagmi focused [wip!]#99
chore: bump deps | wagmi focused [wip!]#99shanimal08 wants to merge 14 commits intotari-project:developmentfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @shanimal08, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on modernizing the project's dependency stack by updating a wide array of packages to their latest versions. The primary goal is to leverage recent improvements, bug fixes, and new features, particularly within the Web3-related libraries like Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This PR updates multiple dependencies, with a focus on wagmi. My review highlights several major version bumps that could introduce breaking changes, which seems to contradict the PR description stating there are none. It's critical to review the release notes for these packages (i18next, next, react-i18next, wagmi, @types/node, eslint-config-next) and test the application thoroughly. I've also noted the change in versioning for viem from a loose range to a more specific one, which is a good practice for build stability but also requires careful testing.
cb4e22e to
67d02e3
Compare
|
closing in favour of #100 (less unnecessary changes) |
Description
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
What process can a PR reviewer use to test or verify this change?
Breaking Changes