Skip to content

Conversation

@Legend-Master
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Legend-Master Legend-Master requested a review from a team as a code owner January 29, 2026 04:20
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 📬Proposal in Roadmap Jan 29, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Package Changes Through 1bb9c35

There are 9 changes which include tauri with minor, @tauri-apps/cli with minor, tauri-cli with minor, tauri-utils with patch, tauri-build with patch, tauri-macos-sign with patch, tauri-bundler with minor, tauri-runtime-wry with minor, tauri-runtime with minor

Planned Package Versions

The following package releases are the planned based on the context of changes in this pull request.

package current next
tauri-utils 2.8.1 2.8.2
tauri-macos-sign 2.3.2 2.3.3
tauri-bundler 2.7.5 2.8.0
tauri-runtime 2.9.2 2.10.0
tauri-runtime-wry 2.9.3 2.10.0
tauri-codegen 2.5.2 2.5.3
tauri-macros 2.5.2 2.5.3
tauri-plugin 2.5.2 2.5.3
tauri-build 2.5.3 2.5.4
tauri 2.9.5 2.10.0
@tauri-apps/cli 2.9.6 2.10.0
tauri-cli 2.9.6 2.10.0

Add another change file through the GitHub UI by following this link.


Read about change files or the docs at github.com/jbolda/covector

Comment on lines 563 to 565
let Some(event_path) = event.paths.first() else {
continue;
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks a bit odd only using the first path? Could maybe use a comment.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why, I simply did a Convert to guarded return refactor using rust analyzer here

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clearly a behavior-preserving refactor, just a drive-by remark.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Legend-Master Legend-Master Jan 30, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like it's from #12164 when we switched to debouncer full which uses it for rename events, I'll see if we want to handle it here

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll see if we want to handle it here

i don't see why we would want to

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For also accounting the renamed to file?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

haha yes obviously. I can't remember what I was getting at anymore, just that I think there's little benefit in behavior compared to the lines of code added - since it's just 5 or so you can ignore me and go on with your day x)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: 📬Proposal

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants