Skip to content

Conversation

@mindvox
Copy link

@mindvox mindvox commented Aug 23, 2016

No description provided.

@mindvox mindvox mentioned this pull request Aug 23, 2016
@tstibbs
Copy link

tstibbs commented Aug 24, 2016

Looks great! Not sure on the exact terms of the MIT licence, but I guess you are supposed to fill in the copyright section? (currently is Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders>)

@mindvox
Copy link
Author

mindvox commented Aug 24, 2016

Yup, makes sense to allow it to be populated. I think MIT should suffice. But you can read more here https://opensource.org/licenses.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants