Parallel index build - #251
Conversation
tjgreen42
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Done with initial pass. I didn't see any test-related changes: we need full unit test coverage both with and without parallelism enabled. Hard-coded limits (like # tuples in base relation => parallel vs not) will need parameterization for this purpose, otherwise unit tests will just revert to serial mode.
|
The parallel build logic I implemented doesn't work on PG13 - I've removed the CI build for it in parallel build (because it doesn't compile), and it's going to be EOL in a few months so I think it's fine to just remove PG13 support? |
tjgreen42
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Getting close. Besides issues mentioned below, we need some documentation updates to the README as part of this PR.
Did you want to disable PG13 still? We probably should anyway. |
No description provided.