Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make cost-based decision about partial aggregation paths #7052

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

akuzm
Copy link
Member

@akuzm akuzm commented Jun 20, 2024

Currently we just remove all existing paths, but after that we add a hash aggregation path (ts_plan_add_hashagg()) which we can prefer based on the cost, which leads to weird behavior.

Currently we just remove all existing paths, but after that we add a
hash aggregation path (ts_plan_add_hashagg()) which we can prefer based
on the cost, which leads to weird behavior.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.78%. Comparing base (59f50f2) to head (58bbd49).
Report is 218 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7052      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.06%   81.78%   +1.71%     
==========================================
  Files         190      200      +10     
  Lines       37181    37232      +51     
  Branches     9450     9702     +252     
==========================================
+ Hits        29770    30450     +680     
+ Misses       2997     2878     -119     
+ Partials     4414     3904     -510     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant