Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 3, 2024. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@kekkox
Copy link

@kekkox kekkox commented Mar 30, 2023

Hi there!👋

I made a small improvement to the code by defining a more specific type for the variant field.
By using a more specific type for the variant field, we can ensure that the code is more accurate and less prone to errors related to this field.

As this is my first contribution to an open source project, please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about the changes I've made. Thank you for considering my contribution!

Changes made:

  • Defined a type that includes only the allowed values for the "variant" field

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant