Skip to content

Conversation

@terabytesoftw
Copy link
Contributor

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw commented Jan 6, 2026

Pull Request

Q A
Is bugfix?
New feature? ✔️
Breaks BC?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Removed project governance and template documentation files.
    • Updated funding information.
  • Documentation

    • Added changelog entry for global configuration file organization enhancements.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 6, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request removes multiple GitHub template files and a funding configuration entry, adds a changelog entry documenting enhancement #44 for global config file organization, and simplifies enum value normalization in test support code by removing explicit string casting and strtolower normalization logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Configuration Deletions
.github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md, .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Entire files removed, eliminating community guidelines, issue reporting templates, and pull request templates.
Funding Configuration Update
.github/FUNDING.yml
Removed GitHub funding entry github: [terabytesoftw].
Changelog Update
CHANGELOG.md
Added new changelog entry under 0.5.0 (Under development): "Enh #44: Using global config files organization".
Test Support Code Refactor
tests/Support/EnumDataGenerator.php
Removed explicit string cast and strtolower() normalization; simplified enum value processing to return normalized value directly as string. Removed global strtolower import.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 Templates swept away with care,
Config files fade to thin air,
Enum values now flow clean and bright,
Changelog grows with fresh delight,
Simpler paths through code so neat! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title describes removing/reorganizing GitHub configuration files, but the actual changes show deletion of community files and a minor code modification in tests. The title doesn't accurately reflect the primary scope of deletions. Consider a more descriptive title that captures the removal of community configuration files (CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md, PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md, FUNDING.yml entry) and the test modification, such as 'chore: Remove community configuration files and update test helper'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c359d99 and 496ee52.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
  • .github/FUNDING.yml
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • tests/Support/EnumDataGenerator.php
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
  • .github/FUNDING.yml
  • .github/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-20T20:28:58.552Z
Learnt from: terabytesoftw
Repo: ui-awesome/html-core PR: 20
File: src/Attribute/HasDraggable.php:45-45
Timestamp: 2025-12-20T20:28:58.552Z
Learning: In the `src/Attribute/HasDraggable.php` file, the `draggable()` method accepts `UnitEnum` to allow custom enums with MDN-compliant values ("true", "false", "auto"), while runtime validation via `Validator::oneOf($value, Draggable::cases(), 'draggable')` ensures only valid values are accepted to prevent browser errors.

Applied to files:

  • tests/Support/EnumDataGenerator.php
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

7-7: LGTM! Changelog entry is properly formatted.

The changelog entry correctly documents enhancement #44 with consistent formatting and proper attribution.

tests/Support/EnumDataGenerator.php (1)

46-46: Type inconsistency in Enum::normalizeValue() usage requires review.

Line 46 and line 82 handle the return value of Enum::normalizeValue() inconsistently:

  • Line 46: $normalizedValue = Enum::normalizeValue($case); (no cast)
  • Line 82: $value = (string) Enum::normalizeValue($case); (explicit cast)

Both values are used in string contexts (string interpolation, sprintf). The inconsistency suggests the return type may not be guaranteed to be a string. If normalizeValue() from the external ui-awesome/html-helper package can return non-string values, line 46 should also include the explicit (string) cast for type safety consistency.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (c359d99) to head (496ee52).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##                main       #44   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage     100.00%   100.00%           
  Complexity       134       134           
===========================================
  Files             33        33           
  Lines            343       343           
===========================================
  Hits             343       343           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@terabytesoftw
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@terabytesoftw
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2026

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw merged commit d069a72 into main Jan 6, 2026
44 checks passed
@terabytesoftw terabytesoftw deleted the fix_mini_22 branch January 6, 2026 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants