[test] Fix exception `Required aspect fp64 is not supported on the de…

…vice` in tests of `std::complex` (#2047)
uxlfoundation · Feb 5, 2025 · 3fc6568 · 3fc6568
1 parent a045eac
commit 3fc6568
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 9 changed files with 47 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/documentation/library_guide/introduction.rst b/documentation/library_guide/introduction.rst
@@ -142,8 +142,9 @@ Known Limitations
 * ``std::array::at`` member function cannot be used in kernels because it may throw an exception;
   use ``std::array::operator[]`` instead.
 * Due to specifics of Microsoft* Visual C++, some standard floating-point math functions
-  (including ``std::ldexp``, ``std::frexp``, ``std::sqrt(std::complex<float>)``) require device support
-  for double precision.
+  (including: ``std::ldexp``, ``std::frexp``), and the following functions when used with ``std::complex<float>``
+  as argument(s):  ``std::acosh``, ``std::asin``, ``std::asinh``, ``std::asoc``, ``std::log10``, ``std::log``, ``std::pow``,
+  ``std::sqrt`` require device support for double precision.
 * ``exclusive_scan``, ``inclusive_scan``, ``exclusive_scan_by_segment``,
   ``inclusive_scan_by_segment``, ``transform_exclusive_scan``, ``transform_inclusive_scan``,
   when used with C++ standard aligned policies, impose limitations on the initial value type if an

diff --git a/test/support/test_config.h b/test/support/test_config.h
@@ -206,6 +206,15 @@
 #define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_SINH_BROKEN  _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_BROKEN
 #define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_TANH_BROKEN  _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_BROKEN
 
+#define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_USING_DOUBLE (_MSVC_STL_VERSION && _MSVC_STL_VERSION <= _PSTL_TEST_LATEST_MSVC_STL_VERSION)
+#define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_ACOS_USING_DOUBLE               _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_USING_DOUBLE
+#define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_ACOSH_USING_DOUBLE              _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_USING_DOUBLE
+#define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_ASIN_USING_DOUBLE               _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_USING_DOUBLE
+#define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_ASINH_USING_DOUBLE              _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_USING_DOUBLE
+#define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_LOG_USING_DOUBLE                _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_USING_DOUBLE
+#define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_LOG10_USING_DOUBLE              _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_USING_DOUBLE
+#define _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_POW_SCALAR_COMPLEX_USING_DOUBLE _PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_USING_DOUBLE
+
 // oneAPI DPC++ compiler 2025.0.0 and earlier is unable to eliminate a "dead" function call to an undefined function
 // within a sycl kernel which MSVC uses to allow comparisons with literal zero without warning
 #define _PSTL_TEST_COMPARISON_BROKEN                                                                                   \

diff --git a/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/acos.pass.cpp b/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/acos.pass.cpp
@@ -140,7 +140,12 @@ void test_edges()
 
 ONEDPL_TEST_NUM_MAIN
 {
+#if !_PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_ACOS_USING_DOUBLE
     test<float>();
+#else
+    IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<float>())
+#endif
+
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<double>())
     IF_LONG_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<long double>())
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test_edges())

diff --git a/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/acosh.pass.cpp b/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/acosh.pass.cpp
@@ -149,7 +149,12 @@ void test_edges()
 
 ONEDPL_TEST_NUM_MAIN
 {
+#if !_PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_ACOSH_USING_DOUBLE
     test<float>();
+#else
+    IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<float>())
+#endif
+
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<double>())
     IF_LONG_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<long double>())
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test_edges())

diff --git a/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/asin.pass.cpp b/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/asin.pass.cpp
@@ -119,7 +119,12 @@ void test_edges()
 
 ONEDPL_TEST_NUM_MAIN
 {
+#if !_PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_ASIN_USING_DOUBLE
     test<float>();
+#else
+    IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<float>())
+#endif
+
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<double>())
     IF_LONG_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<long double>())
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test_edges())

diff --git a/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/asinh.pass.cpp b/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/asinh.pass.cpp
@@ -126,7 +126,12 @@ void test_edges()
 
 ONEDPL_TEST_NUM_MAIN
 {
+#if !_PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_ASINH_USING_DOUBLE
     test<float>();
+#else
+    IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<float>())
+#endif
+
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<double>())
     IF_LONG_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<long double>())
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test_edges())

diff --git a/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/log.pass.cpp b/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/log.pass.cpp
@@ -124,7 +124,12 @@ void test_edges()
 
 ONEDPL_TEST_NUM_MAIN
 {
+#if !_PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_LOG_USING_DOUBLE
     test<float>();
+#else
+    IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<float>())
+#endif
+
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<double>())
     IF_LONG_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<long double>())
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test_edges())

diff --git a/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/log10.pass.cpp b/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/log10.pass.cpp
@@ -62,7 +62,12 @@ void test_edges()
 
 ONEDPL_TEST_NUM_MAIN
 {
+#if !_PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_LOG10_USING_DOUBLE
     test<float>();
+#else
+    IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<float>())
+#endif
+
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<double>())
     IF_LONG_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<long double>())
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test_edges())

diff --git a/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/pow_scalar_complex.pass.cpp b/test/xpu_api/numerics/complex.number/complex.transcendentals/pow_scalar_complex.pass.cpp
@@ -73,7 +73,12 @@ void test_edges()
 
 ONEDPL_TEST_NUM_MAIN
 {
+#if !_PSTL_TEST_COMPLEX_OP_POW_SCALAR_COMPLEX_USING_DOUBLE
     test<float>();
+#else
+    IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<float>())
+#endif
+
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<double>())
     IF_LONG_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test<long double>())
     IF_DOUBLE_SUPPORT(test_edges())