Skip to content

Conversation

@dofaromg
Copy link

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 16, 2025 03:22
Copilot finished reviewing on behalf of dofaromg November 16, 2025 03:23
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow for building the Next.js project using Webpack. The workflow is configured to run on pushes and pull requests to the canary branch, testing against multiple Node.js versions.

Key Changes:

  • Adds automated CI/CD workflow for Webpack builds
  • Configures matrix testing across Node.js versions 18.x, 20.x, and 22.x
  • Implements basic build steps using npm and webpack

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines 25 to 28
- name: Build
run: |
npm install
npx webpack

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Update CI job to use valid build step

The new workflow runs npm install followed by npx webpack, but this repository is configured for pnpm workspaces and does not include a root-level webpack entry/config. As written the job will consistently fail on every push/PR to canary because webpack cannot find a project to build (and npm will also ignore the existing pnpm lockfile), so the workflow never succeeds.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@dofaromg
Copy link
Author

dofaromg commented Nov 16, 2025 via email

Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
- name: Build
run: |
pnpm install
npx webpack
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The direct npx webpack command may fail since it requires webpack to be installed and properly configured. Next.js projects typically use their own build system through commands like pnpm build, which would leverage the project's existing configuration. Consider replacing this with the appropriate Next.js build command to ensure compatibility with the project's build pipeline.

Suggested change
npx webpack
pnpm build

Spotted by Graphite Agent

Fix in Graphite


Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +30 to +33
- name: Build
run: |
pnpm install
npx webpack

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Build step invokes nonexistent webpack target

The workflow now runs npx webpack after a root pnpm install, but this repo is a pnpm/turbo monorepo without a root webpack dependency or config. On every push/PR to canary the job will fail because npx cannot find a webpack binary or project to build, so the workflow never succeeds.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

- name: Build
run: |
pnpm install
npx webpack
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
npx webpack
pnpm run test-webpack

The workflow will fail because npx webpack is run without any configuration or entry point. Webpack won't know what to bundle and will error out.

View Details

Analysis

Webpack workflow fails with missing configuration and entry point

What fails: The GitHub Actions workflow in .github/workflows/webpack.yml executes npx webpack without any configuration file or entry point, causing the build to fail with "Module not found: Error: Can't resolve './src'"

How to reproduce:

# Clone the repo and run the workflow steps:
pnpm install
npx webpack

Result:

ERROR in main
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve './src' in '/path/to/repo'
  using description file: /path/to/repo/package.json (relative path: .)
    using description file: /path/to/repo/package.json (relative path: ./src)
      no extension
        /path/to/repo/src doesn't exist
      .js
        /path/to/repo/src.js doesn't exist
      .json
        /path/to/repo/src.json doesn't exist
      .wasm
        /path/to/repo/src.wasm doesn't exist
      as directory
        /path/to/repo/src doesn't exist

webpack 5.98.0 compiled with 1 error and 1 warning in 38 ms

Expected: The workflow should successfully test webpack functionality using the existing test suite, not fail with missing module resolution.

Fix: Changed the workflow to run pnpm run test-webpack which is the appropriate webpack test command already defined in package.json. This aligns with the workflow's purpose of validating webpack compatibility while using actual project test infrastructure rather than attempting to bundle a non-existent entry point.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant