Skip to content

Conversation

@Wertzui123
Copy link
Contributor

@Wertzui123 Wertzui123 commented Oct 30, 2025

I just noticed these two details while skimming through the VSL code.

The < 3 expression (instead of the previous < 2) is logically equivalent here but could theoretically lead to better performance for is_prime(2) because in that case the second condition p % 2 == 0 doesn't even need to be evaluated anymore.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved prime number validation logic with updated boundary conditions.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The is_prime function's boundary condition is adjusted from p < 2 || p % 2 == 0 to p < 3 || p % 2 == 0, tightening the lower bound check while preserving correctness for small primes and even numbers.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Prime boundary check update
prime/prime.v
Updated is_prime boundary condition from p < 2 to p < 3, maintaining correct behavior for primes 2 and above while handling edge cases identically

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single-line boundary condition adjustment in a utility function
  • Verify the logic change preserves correctness for edge cases (p = 0, 1, 2, 3)
  • Confirm no tests are broken by this modification

Poem

A rabbit hops through numbers bright,
Adjusting bounds to set things right,
From two to three, the check now reads,
Primes identified with greater speed! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ⚠️ Warning The pull request title states "prime: minor optimization and formatting fix." According to the raw summary, the changeset contains a boundary check optimization changing if p < 2 || p % 2 == 0 to if p < 3 || p % 2 == 0, which aligns with the "minor optimization" portion of the title and the PR objectives. However, the raw summary explicitly identifies only a logic change (boundary tightening) and makes no mention of any "formatting fix"—no whitespace adjustments, indentation changes, or other formatting modifications are described. The title therefore includes an unsubstantiated claim about formatting changes that do not appear in the provided changeset summary. The title should be corrected to accurately reflect only the changes present in the changeset. Consider revising it to "prime: minor optimization to boundary check" or similar phrasing that removes the reference to a formatting fix. If formatting changes are genuinely present in the full diff but were simply omitted from the summary, the author should clarify this or ensure the summary captures all modifications.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
prime/prime.v (1)

7-8: Change is correct but offers minimal practical benefit.

The modified condition p < 3 is logically equivalent to the previous p < 2 for all inputs. For p == 2, the new code short-circuits after the first check, avoiding the p % 2 == 0 evaluation.

However, modulo-by-2 is typically implemented as a bitwise AND operation (p & 1), which is extremely fast—on the order of a single CPU cycle. The performance gain from avoiding this operation is negligible in practice.

Additionally, p < 2 is slightly more intuitive, as it explicitly conveys "numbers less than 2 are not prime."

</review_comment_end -->

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98a75c5 and 557ce80.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • prime/prime.v (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04)
  • GitHub Check: MegaLinter
  • GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04)
  • GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-22.04, --prod)
  • GitHub Check: run-tests-on-linux (ubuntu-24.04, --prod)
  • GitHub Check: run-tests-on-macos (macos-latest)

@Wertzui123
Copy link
Contributor Author

The CI failures seem to be unrelated to this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant