Skip to content

Suggestions from January review on §7 #201

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

@pchampin pchampin commented Apr 24, 2025

@franconi suggested to define symmetric/generalized RDF *terms*
but I found it easier to refer "triple terms" to the definition of
"symmetric/generalized RDF triple".

Also, I made the definitions more homogeneous.
@pchampin pchampin added the spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial label Apr 24, 2025
@pchampin pchampin requested review from gkellogg and hartig April 24, 2025 00:06
Copy link
Member

@TallTed TallTed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, with @hartig's changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants