-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Issue #143 (Skolemization) #236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Niklas Lindström <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
This was discussed during the #rdf-star meeting on 04 September 2025. View the transcriptw3c/rdf-concepts#143<doerthe> w3c/rdf-concepts#236 <gb> Pull Request 236 Issue #143 (Skolemization) (by doerthe) doerthe: I have something to do on this, and I would like Enrico's comments ora: What else? tl: five lines all relate to one issue pchampin: I looked at RDF Concepts. I didn't find anything about vagueness of rdf:reifies pchampin: there was progress on requesting horizontal review pchampin: we are OK with some because nothing involves their area ora: Pat Hayes said it is OK to forward his email to the mailing list ora: I will do this after our meeting enrico: I committed a change to the semantics PR ora: is there a SPARQL meeting tomorrow AndyS: yes ora: adjourn <pchampin> s/ora: What else?/Topic: AOB |
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
This closes #143
I reformulated the text to address issue #143 .
Further suggestions are welcome.
Preview | Diff