Skip to content

Conversation

doerthe
Copy link

@doerthe doerthe commented Aug 21, 2025

This closes #143

I reformulated the text to address issue #143 .
Further suggestions are welcome.


Preview | Diff

Co-authored-by: Niklas Lindström <[email protected]>
@doerthe doerthe requested a review from franconi September 4, 2025 16:32
doerthe and others added 2 commits September 4, 2025 18:53
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
@w3cbot
Copy link

w3cbot commented Sep 4, 2025

This was discussed during the #rdf-star meeting on 04 September 2025.

View the transcript

w3c/rdf-concepts#143

<doerthe> w3c/rdf-concepts#236

<gb> Pull Request 236 Issue #143 (Skolemization) (by doerthe)

doerthe: I have something to do on this, and I would like Enrico's comments

ora: What else?

tl: five lines all relate to one issue

pchampin: I looked at RDF Concepts. I didn't find anything about vagueness of rdf:reifies

pchampin: there was progress on requesting horizontal review

pchampin: we are OK with some because nothing involves their area

ora: Pat Hayes said it is OK to forward his email to the mailing list

ora: I will do this after our meeting

enrico: I committed a change to the semantics PR

ora: is there a SPARQL meeting tomorrow

AndyS: yes

ora: adjourn

<pchampin> s/ora: What else?/Topic: AOB


Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"3.7 Replacing Blank Nodes with IRIs" very misleading
4 participants