Skip to content

chore(readme): add a section about this fork - #200

Merged
tmm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/readme-fork-section
Nov 13, 2026
Merged

tmm merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/readme-fork-section

Conversation

@tmm

@tmm tmm commented Nov 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds a "This fork" section at the bottom of README.md. Docs only, so there's no changeset.

  • Upstream's README above it stays byte-identical to rocicorp/mono's (its 62 lines match origin/main), so a weekly sync only conflicts if upstream edits the file's last lines.
  • What it adds: the Swift client, the Rust client, the zero-swift and zero-rust CLIs, the conformance vectors, the zbugs apps (Swift, Rune, GPUI) and the restored tests.
  • How it differs: the restored tests (zql, zqlite, zero-protocol, zero-schema, zero-types, zql-integration-tests; zero-cache's still aren't here), pull requests merged here, and the weekly Sync rocicorp/mono main merge.
  • It says upstream's lines about missing tests and unmerged pull requests don't apply here.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md is unchanged.

Checks: oxfmt --check README.md passes, and every relative link in the new section resolves. In a simulated merge, an upstream edit mid-file merges cleanly.

Appends a "This fork" section after upstream's README, which stays
byte-identical above it, so a weekly sync only conflicts if upstream edits
the file's last lines. The section lists what the fork adds (the Swift and
Rust clients, the zero-swift and zero-rust CLIs, the zbugs apps, the
conformance vectors and the restored tests), and says how it differs from
upstream: the restored tests, pull requests merged here, and the weekly
upstream sync. It says that upstream's lines about missing tests and
unmerged pull requests don't apply here.

Amp-Thread-ID: https://ampcode.com/threads/T-4dda2f95-f044-4a79-90b1-7d3e3196085f
Co-authored-by: tmm <tmm@tmm.dev>
@tmm
tmm merged commit 2fb54ea into main Nov 13, 2026
17 checks passed
@tmm
tmm deleted the chore/readme-fork-section branch November 13, 2026 23:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants