Skip to content

Conversation

UgnineSirdis
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 44.37%. Comparing base (ef49df2) to head (2e20069).

Files Patch % Lines
...main/java/tech/ydb/topic/read/impl/ReaderImpl.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #279      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     44.39%   44.37%   -0.03%     
  Complexity     1571     1571              
============================================
  Files           297      297              
  Lines         11505    11506       +1     
  Branches       1124     1124              
============================================
- Hits           5108     5106       -2     
- Misses         5988     5991       +3     
  Partials        409      409              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ private void sendReadRequest() {
if (currentSizeBytesToRequest <= 0) {
logger.debug("[{}] Nothing to request in DataRequest. sizeBytesToRequest == {}", fullId,
currentSizeBytesToRequest);
sizeBytesToRequest.addAndGet(currentSizeBytesToRequest);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Negative size is unreal afaik.
Zero is pretty possible in case of race condition between two threads.
Fix is kinda paranoic but OK.
I'd check for zero before modifying Atomic member

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants