Skip to content

Conversation

@YuanRisheng
Copy link
Collaborator

Reverts #5062

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 28, 2025 04:01
@paddle-bot
Copy link

paddle-bot bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Thanks for your contribution!

Copilot finished reviewing on behalf of YuanRisheng November 28, 2025 04:02
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR reverts a previous contribution (#5062) that added comprehensive unit tests for the SplitwiseConnector module. The entire test file containing 673 lines of test code is being removed.

Key Changes

  • Complete removal of tests/splitwise/test_splitwise_connector.py which contained unit tests for SplitwiseConnector functionality
  • Deletion includes test fixtures, mock objects, and 20+ test cases covering various connector scenarios
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

tests/splitwise/test_splitwise_connector.py:1

  • PR标题格式问题:标题应遵循 [类别]标题 的格式,例如 [BugFix] 修复数据处理器内存泄漏

当前标题 "Revert \"[CI] 【Hackathon 9th Sprint No.41】NO.41 功能模块单测补充 -part\"" 是一个revert操作,建议修改为更清晰的格式,例如:

  • [Revert] 撤销 Hackathon 9th Sprint No.41 的单测补充
  • [CI] Revert splitwise connector test additions

Additionally, the PR description only states "Reverts #5062" but lacks explanation of why this revert is needed. Please add:

  • The reason for reverting (e.g., test failures, incorrect implementation, conflicts with other changes)
  • What problem this revert solves
  • Whether there are plans to re-add the tests with fixes

@CSWYF3634076 CSWYF3634076 merged commit ded7765 into develop Dec 2, 2025
19 of 23 checks passed
@EmmonsCurse EmmonsCurse deleted the revert-5062-fastdeploy/splitwise/splitwise_connector.py branch December 2, 2025 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants