-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Photons histEFT #421
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Photons histEFT #421
Conversation
Conflicts: analysis/topEFT/topeft.py topcoffea/json/params.json topcoffea/modules/objects.py topcoffea/modules/selection.py
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "xsec": 2.2471, | |||
| "xsec": 2.9922, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What was this change to the xsec? Was that the 33% correction? If so, we should consider moving that somewhere else instead of overwriting the xsec, just to make it more clear for future users.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. Do you suggest moving that info directly inside the analysis processor where if ttgamma sample is being used, we scale the xsec by 1.33? In any case, neither of the approach should be permanent anyway cause like Kevin said, scaling cross-section won't be a physically correct thing to do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be best to store that factor somewhere in a json/yml file.
…ions-for-custom-bins Revert "Rebin stacked ratio plots with custom bin edges"
This PR ports the
photonsbranch tohistEFT.