Skip to content

Conversation

@gaogaotiantian
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Instead of do a fixed time wait, we try to poll results until it meets the requirement.

Why are the changes needed?

We are wasting time on this test. time.sleep(60) is totally unnecessary. I still have trouble with the other time.sleep(30) which just try to wait to see if the server crashes without traffic - but at least that has an explanation.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

My local setup has some issues with this specific test so I'll have to wait for the CI result.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2026

JIRA Issue Information

=== Test SPARK-54957 ===
Summary: Accelerate test_parity_listener.py
Assignee: None
Status: Open
Affected: ["4.2.0"]


This comment was automatically generated by GitHub Actions

Copy link
Contributor

@allisonwang-db allisonwang-db left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants