Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(control_validator)!: prefix package and namespace with autoware #7304

Conversation

danielsanchezaran
Copy link
Contributor

@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran commented Jun 6, 2024

Description

Part of:

Add autoware prefix

Related links

Tests performed

PSim, checked that node and topic work as usual

image

Notes for reviewers

Interface changes

ROS Topic Changes

ROS Parameter Changes

Effects on system behavior

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

  • The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
  • The PR has been properly tested.
  • The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
  • The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2024 06:16
@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran added the tag:run-build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) label Jun 6, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added type:documentation Creating or refining documentation. (auto-assigned) component:control Vehicle control algorithms and mechanisms. (auto-assigned) component:system System design and integration. (auto-assigned) type:ci Continuous Integration (CI) processes and testing. (auto-assigned) component:launch Launch files, scripts and initialization tools. (auto-assigned) labels Jun 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

autoware_autoware_autoware_....?

@kyoichi-sugahara
Copy link
Contributor

kyoichi-sugahara commented Jun 6, 2024

@danielsanchezaran
here also should be changed?
how did you perform test?


![control_validator](./image/control_validator.drawio.svg)
![autoware_control_validator](./image/autoware_control_validator.drawio.svg)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
![autoware_control_validator](./image/autoware_control_validator.drawio.svg)
![autoware_control_validator](./image/control_validator.drawio.svg)

| `/diagnostics` | diagnostic_msgs/DiagnosticStatus | diagnostics to report errors |
| Name | Type | Description |
| ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `~/output/validation_status` | autoware_control_validator/ControlValidatorStatus | validator status to inform the reason why the trajectory is valid/invalid |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
| `~/output/validation_status` | autoware_control_validator/ControlValidatorStatus | validator status to inform the reason why the trajectory is valid/invalid |
| `~/output/validation_status` | control_validator/ControlValidatorStatus | validator status to inform the reason why the trajectory is valid/invalid |

@danielsanchezaran
Copy link
Contributor Author

@danielsanchezaran
here also should be changed?
how did you perform test?

Psim and checked the output from the validator topic and that the node exists

@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran changed the title feat(control_validator): add autoware prefix to control validator feat(control_validator): prefix package and namespace with autoware_ Jun 6, 2024
@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran force-pushed the add-autoware-prefix-to-control-validator branch from a6e86d3 to aaa803c Compare June 7, 2024 04:23
@kyoichi-sugahara kyoichi-sugahara changed the title feat(control_validator): prefix package and namespace with autoware_ refactor(control_validator)!: prefix package and namespace with autoware Jun 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ito-san ito-san left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could anyone please fix the CODEOWNERS errors?

@ito-san ito-san self-requested a review June 10, 2024 05:30
Copy link
Contributor

@ito-san ito-san left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@danielsanchezaran
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could anyone please fix the CODEOWNERS errors?

Yhank you for your message, we will fix the codeowners in a different PR after the Autoware prefix adding PRs are merged.

@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran enabled auto-merge (squash) June 10, 2024 07:43
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran force-pushed the add-autoware-prefix-to-control-validator branch from dfd3a0a to 8c97463 Compare June 10, 2024 08:10
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran enabled auto-merge (squash) June 10, 2024 08:15
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran merged commit 7a55d57 into autowarefoundation:main Jun 10, 2024
24 checks passed
@danielsanchezaran danielsanchezaran deleted the add-autoware-prefix-to-control-validator branch June 10, 2024 09:45
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ void ControlValidator::setupParameters()
}

try {
vehicle_info_ = autoware::vehicle_info_utils::VehicleInfoUtils(*this).getVehicleInfo();
vehicle_info_ = autoware::vehicle_info_utils::VehicleInfoUtil(*this).getVehicleInfo();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@danielsanchezaran
It seems that it has a mistake to change

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in
#7417

KhalilSelyan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
…are (#7304)

* rename folders

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* rename add prefix

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* change param path

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* fix pluggin problem

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* fix extra prefixes

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* change back launchers

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* add namespace to address conflict

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

* delete stubborn file

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>

---------

Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:control Vehicle control algorithms and mechanisms. (auto-assigned) component:launch Launch files, scripts and initialization tools. (auto-assigned) component:system System design and integration. (auto-assigned) tag:run-build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) type:ci Continuous Integration (CI) processes and testing. (auto-assigned) type:documentation Creating or refining documentation. (auto-assigned)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants