docs(web-modeler): adjust collaboration for keycloak special handling…

[JacobiCamunda]

… removal

Description

Adjust documentation accordingly for removing the special handling of Keycloak.

Closes https://github.com/camunda/web-modeler/issues/19222

When should this change go live?

• This is a bug fix, security concern, or something that needs urgent release support. (add bug or support label)
• This is already available but undocumented and should be released within a week. (add available & undocumented label)
• This is on a specific schedule and the assignee will coordinate a release with the Documentation team. (create draft PR and/or add hold label)
• This is part of a scheduled alpha or minor. (add alpha or minor label)
• There is no urgency with this change (add low prio label)

PR Checklist

• The commit history of this PR is cleaned up, using {type}(scope): {description} commit message(s)

• My changes are for an upcoming minor release and are in the /docs directory (version 8.9).
• My changes are for an already released minor and are in a /versioned_docs directory.

• I added a DRI, team, or delegate as a reviewer for technical accuracy and grammar/style:
  • Engineering team review
  • Technical writer review via @camunda/tech-writers unless working with an embedded writer.

[github-actions]

👋 🤖 🤔 Hello, @afgambin! Did you make your changes in all the right places?

These files were changed only in docs/. You might want to duplicate these changes in versioned_docs/version-8.8/.

• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/collaboration.md
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-collaborator-invite-added.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-collaborator-invite-choose-role.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-collaborator-invite-modal-opened.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-collaborator-invite-sent.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-collaborator-invite-suggestions.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-collaborator-invite-type-message.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-comment-mention-suggestions.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-comment-overlay-on-diagram.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-comment-type-here.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-comment-with-context-menu.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-home.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-share-icon-button.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-share-modal-create.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-share-modal-email.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-share-modal-password-protect.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/img/web-modeler-share-modal.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/collaboration/use-shared-project-for-organization-wide-collaboration.md
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/img/invite-all-organization-members.png
• docs/components/modeler/web-modeler/img/invite-collaborators.png
• docs/reference/announcements-release-notes/890/890-announcements.md

You may have done this intentionally, but we wanted to point it out in case you didn't. You can read more about the versioning within our docs in our documentation guidelines.

[mesellings]

@afgambin can you please support @JacobiCamunda with a review here? 🙏

[pablocabrera85]

Nice work. 🚀 Left one small suggestion. If a customer upgrades to 8.9 and had pending invitations, do they need to do anything or are they affected by this change? If yes, would it make sense to document it?

[JacobiCamunda]

If a customer upgrades to 8.9 and had pending invitations, do they need to do anything or are they affected by this change? If yes, would it make sense to document it?

The concept of pending invitations is reintroduced with 8.9 for Self-Managed (we had this before and removed it). Right now you only add people directly and for Keycloak the users are created for them even if they did not log in before. Therefore, most likely there are no pending invitations (I don't know when we removed it) and there is no problem. Even if they had pending invitations, this is no problem because they will be just accepted when they log in for the first time. There should be no problem. But good that you thought about this 🙂

[afgambin]

Reviewed, tweaked a bit some text. lgtm now!