feat(api): create modularized libraries #113
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration and the introduction of a new documentation page. The workflow job name has been changed from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
❌ Deploy Preview for cuhacking-portal-dev failed. Why did it fail? →
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
libs/db/src/lib/db.spec.ts (1)
1-7: Good start with the test file!The addition of the test file and the basic test case for the
dbfunction is a good starting point. It provides a foundational check that the function returns the expected value.Consider adding more test cases to cover edge cases and error scenarios, such as:
- Test cases for different input values
- Test cases for invalid or unexpected input values
- Test cases for any error conditions that the
dbfunction may encounterlibs/api/src/lib/api.spec.ts (1)
1-7: LGTM! Consider adding more test cases.The test suite is correctly set up and the test case effectively verifies the basic functionality of the
apifunction.However, to improve the test coverage, consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases.
libs/env/src/lib/env.spec.ts (1)
1-7: Good start with the test file, but expand the test coverage.Adding a test file for the
envmodule is a good practice. The current test case provides a basic level of validation for theenvfunction. However, consider the following suggestions to improve the test coverage:
Add more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases for the
envfunction. For example:
- Test with different input values or types.
- Test error scenarios and how the function handles them.
Include tests to validate the actual behavior and functionality of the
envfunction in the context of the application's environment configuration. Ensure that the function correctly retrieves and returns the expected environment variables or configuration values.Consider using realistic and meaningful test data that aligns with the intended usage of the
envfunction in the application.By expanding the test coverage, you can ensure that the
envmodule is thoroughly tested and reliable.libs/auth/src/lib/auth.spec.ts (1)
4-6: Add more test cases to improve coverage.The test case is correctly defined and provides a basic level of verification for the
authfunction's output. However, consider adding more test cases to cover edge cases and error conditions to improve the overall test coverage.libs/api/src/routes/user/index.ts (1)
1-9: LGTM! The code segment follows tRPC best practices and aligns with the PR objectives.The
userRouterand thehelloprocedure are well-structured and demonstrate how to handle user-specific data in tRPC procedures. The code segment serves as a good foundation for building user-related API endpoints.Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose and usage of the
userRouterand its procedures. This will enhance the code's readability and maintainability.- If the
ctxobject is expected to have a specific structure, consider defining an interface for it to provide better type safety and code completion.libs/api/src/index.ts (1)
4-4: Consider adding a comment to clarify the re-exported entities.The re-export allows for a cleaner API surface by exposing the necessary entities from
./lib/api. However, it's unclear what specific entities are being re-exported without examining the./lib/apimodule.Consider adding a comment to clarify the re-exported entities, such as:
// Re-export specific entities (e.g., types, functions) from './lib/api' export * from './lib/api'libs/api/vite.config.ts (1)
9-14: LGTM!The plugins configuration correctly includes the
nxViteTsPaths()plugin to facilitate TypeScript path mapping and enhance module resolution during development.Consider adding a TODO comment above the commented-out worker plugins section to clearly indicate the purpose and potential timeline for implementing worker support. This will help maintain clarity and provide a roadmap for future enhancements.
libs/env/src/website/server.ts (1)
22-24: LGTM!Setting
emptyStringAsUndefinedto true ensures that empty strings are treated as undefined values, providing a consistent behavior across the configuration.Regarding the commented-out line:
// skipValidation: !!process.env.['SKIP_ENV_VALIDATION'],If this feature is not intended to be used, consider removing the commented-out line to keep the code clean and avoid confusion. If it is planned for future use, consider adding a TODO comment to clarify its purpose and when it should be implemented.
libs/api/eslint.config.js (2)
1-6: Reminder: Address the TODO comment and consider future enhancements.The TODO comment indicates that the configuration may need to be merged with an external configuration in the future. Additionally, the commented-out lines suggest potential future integrations or dependencies. Please ensure that these items are addressed or removed as the project progresses.
7-42: LGTM! Consider activating the commented-out configurations as needed.The asynchronous IIFE provides a flexible approach to managing ESLint settings, allowing for easy integration of additional rules in the future. As the project progresses, consider activating the commented-out configurations for specific environments and file types, such as React with TypeScript and Next.js. Additionally, the placeholder for ignoring certain directories can be utilized as needed.
libs/auth/eslint.config.js (1)
1-1: Reminder: Address the TODO comment.The TODO comment indicates that the config needs to be merged with an external config. Please ensure that this is addressed before merging the PR.
Do you want me to open a GitHub issue to track this task?
libs/env/eslint.config.js (1)
19-48: Consider moving the commented-out configurations to a separate documentation file.The commented-out configurations suggest areas for future customization but do not affect the current functionality. They cover a wide range of scenarios, including framework-specific rules, file type-specific rules, and testing environment configurations.
While keeping the commented-out configurations in the file can serve as a reference for future enhancements, consider moving them to a separate documentation file (e.g.,
eslint-config-extensions.md) to improve code readability and maintainability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (61)
- .verdaccio/config.yml (1 hunks)
- libs/api/README.md (1 hunks)
- libs/api/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/api/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/api/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/api/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/src/lib/api.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/src/lib/api.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/src/routes/user/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/src/trpc.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/api/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
- libs/api/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
- libs/api/vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/README.md (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/actions/logout.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/lib/auth.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/lib/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/lucia.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/README.md (1 hunks)
- libs/db/drizzle.config.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/db/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/db/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/db/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/src/lib/db.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/src/lib/db.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/src/schema/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/src/schema/session.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/src/schema/user.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/db/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
- libs/db/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
- libs/db/vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/env/README.md (1 hunks)
- libs/env/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/env/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/env/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/env/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/env/src/lib/env.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/env/src/lib/env.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/env/src/shared.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/env/src/website/db.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/env/src/website/server.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/env/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/env/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
- libs/env/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
- libs/env/vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
- project.json (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.base.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (11)
- libs/api/README.md
- libs/api/src/lib/api.ts
- libs/auth/README.md
- libs/auth/src/index.ts
- libs/auth/src/lib/auth.ts
- libs/db/README.md
- libs/db/package.json
- libs/db/src/lib/db.ts
- libs/db/src/schema/index.ts
- libs/env/README.md
- libs/env/src/lib/env.ts
Additional comments not posted (106)
libs/env/src/index.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM!The re-export of all entities from
./website/dbpromotes modularity and ease of use, allowing other parts of the application to utilize the database functionalities from a single entry point.
2-2: LGTM!The re-export of all entities from
./website/serverpromotes modularity and ease of use, allowing other parts of the application to utilize the server functionalities from a single entry point.libs/db/src/lib/db.spec.ts (1)
1-1: Verify the implementation of thedbfunction.The test case assumes the existence of the
dbfunction in thedbmodule. Please ensure that the function is implemented correctly in the corresponding module file.Run the following script to verify the function implementation:
Verification successful
The
dbfunction is correctly implemented in thedbmodule.The
dbfunction is exported fromlibs/db/src/lib/db.tswith the following implementation:export function db(): string { return 'db' }This implementation matches the import statement in the test file and provides a simple string return value.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `db` function in the `db` module. # Test: Search for the function declaration. Expect: A function named `db` in the `db` module. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function db() { $$$ }' libs/db/src/lib/db.tsLength of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the `db` function or constant in the `db` module. # Search for any declaration or export of `db` echo "Searching for db declaration:" rg "(?:const|let|var|function|class)\s+db|export.*db" libs/db/src/lib/db.ts # Search for any mention of `db` in case it's defined differently echo "Searching for any mention of db:" rg "db" libs/db/src/lib/db.ts # If not found in db.ts, search in the entire libs/db/src/lib directory echo "Searching in the entire libs/db/src/lib directory:" rg "(?:const|let|var|function|class)\s+db|export.*db" libs/db/src/lib/ # List all files in the libs/db/src/lib directory echo "Listing files in libs/db/src/lib:" ls -la libs/db/src/lib/Length of output: 889
libs/auth/src/lib/auth.spec.ts (1)
3-7: LGTM!The test suite is correctly defined using the
describefunction, and the name accurately reflects the module being tested.libs/api/package.json (1)
1-10: LGTM! Thepackage.jsonfile is set up correctly for the@cuhacking/apimodule.A few key observations:
- The
"type": "module"field correctly indicates the use of ES module syntax for this module.- The main entry point at
./src/index.jsprovides a clear starting point for the module.- The dependency on
tslibis a common runtime library for TypeScript projects, which provides helpful utility functions.- The
typingsfield pointing to./src/index.d.tsis great for providing TypeScript type definitions, making this module easier to use in TypeScript projects.Overall, this
package.jsonfile sets up a solid foundation for the@cuhacking/apimodule. The metadata is clear and the module is configured correctly as an ES module with TypeScript support.libs/env/package.json (1)
1-10: LGTM!The
package.jsonfile for the@cuhacking/envpackage is well-structured and follows best practices:
- The package name follows the
@scope/package-nameconvention for scoped packages.- The
typefield is set tomodule, indicating the use of ES module syntax.- The
mainfield correctly points to the entry point of the package.- The dependency on
tslibis a common runtime library for TypeScript, and the version range allows for minor and patch updates.- The
typingsfield correctly points to the TypeScript type definitions file, enhancing the package's usability in TypeScript projects.Great job!
libs/auth/package.json (1)
1-10: LGTM! Thepackage.jsonfile follows best practices.The
package.jsonfile for the@cuhacking/authmodule is well-structured and includes all the necessary fields for a publishable package. Here are some highlights:
- The
namefield correctly uses the@scope/packagenaming convention for scoped packages.- The
typefield is set tomodule, which is the recommended setting for packages that use ECMAScript modules.- The
mainfield correctly points to the entry point file./src/index.js.- The
dependenciesfield includestslib, a common runtime dependency for TypeScript projects.- The
typingsfield correctly points to the TypeScript declaration file./src/index.d.ts, enhancing the package's usability in TypeScript projects.Overall, the
package.jsonfile adheres to best practices and sets up the package for successful publishing and integration with other projects.libs/db/src/schema/user.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM!The imports are correct and necessary for defining the database schema using Drizzle ORM.
3-8: Excellent schema definition!The user schema is well-defined with appropriate field names, types, and constraints. The schema structure ensures data integrity and allows for the efficient storage and retrieval of user information.
libs/api/tsconfig.lib.json (1)
1-10: LGTM!The TypeScript configuration for the library is set up correctly:
- It extends the base
tsconfig.jsonfor consistency.- It includes necessary compiler options for generating a library (
declarationandoutDir).- It includes all relevant TypeScript files in the
srcdirectory.- It excludes unnecessary files like tests and Vite configuration.
The configuration ensures that the library is compiled correctly and the output is kept separate from the source files.
libs/auth/tsconfig.lib.json (1)
1-10: LGTM!The TypeScript configuration for the library is set up correctly:
- It extends the base
tsconfig.jsonfor consistency.- It includes necessary compiler options for generating a library (
declarationandoutDir).- It includes all relevant TypeScript files in the
srcdirectory.- It excludes unnecessary files like tests and Vite configuration.
The configuration ensures that the library is compiled correctly and includes only the necessary files in the output.
libs/env/tsconfig.lib.json (1)
1-10: LGTM!The TypeScript configuration for the library is set up correctly:
- It extends the base
tsconfig.jsonconfiguration.- The compiler options are appropriate for a library, including generating declaration files and outputting to the correct directory.
- The inclusion and exclusion of files are specified correctly to ensure only necessary files are compiled.
Great job setting up the configuration for the library!
libs/db/tsconfig.lib.json (1)
1-10: LGTM!The TypeScript configuration file for the
libs/dblibrary is well-structured and includes appropriate settings:
- Extending the base
tsconfig.jsonconfiguration maintains consistency with the project's TypeScript settings.- Including Node.js types is suitable for a library that may interact with Node.js APIs.
- Enabling declaration file generation is beneficial for providing type definitions to library consumers.
- Setting the output directory keeps the compiled files separate from the source files.
- The file inclusions and exclusions are sensible, ensuring that only relevant files are compiled.
Overall, the configuration is appropriate for a library and does not introduce any apparent issues.
libs/db/drizzle.config.ts (1)
1-12: LGTM!The Drizzle ORM configuration object is correctly set up for PostgreSQL integration. It specifies the necessary settings such as the dialect, schema file location, output directory, and database credentials.
Using the
@cuhacking/envpackage to source the database URL from the environment variable is a secure practice and aligns with the PR objective of using modularized libraries.libs/env/src/shared.ts (1)
1-12: Excellent use of@t3-oss/env-nextjsandzodfor environment configuration and validation!The code segment demonstrates a well-structured approach to managing environment variables:
- The use of
createEnvfrom@t3-oss/env-nextjsprovides a centralized way to define and access environment variables.- The
NODE_ENVvariable is properly defined usingzod, allowing only valid values ('development', 'test', 'production') and marking it as optional.- Retrieving the runtime value of
NODE_ENVfrom the process environment variables ensures that the current environment is accurately reflected.This setup promotes maintainability, reduces the risk of configuration-related issues, and aligns with best practices by leveraging well-known libraries.
project.json (1)
1-14: Configuration looks good!The
project.jsonfile correctly defines the project configuration for@cuhacking/sourceand sets up alocal-registrytarget using the@nx/js:verdaccioexecutor. The provided options ensure a properly configured Verdaccio instance for local package management and testing.libs/api/src/index.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM!The imports follow a modular approach and have clear naming. They are used to establish the application's routing and context management.
6-8: LGTM!The
appRouterserves as the main router for the application, incorporating theuserRouterto organize the routing logic for user-related operations. The use ofcreateRouterprovides a structured way to define the application's routing.
10-10: LGTM!Exporting the
AppRoutertype allows for type-safe interactions with the router throughout the application. The use oftypeofensures that theAppRoutertype stays in sync with theappRouterdefinition.
12-14: LGTM!The
createCallerfunction facilitates the invocation of remote procedure calls in a structured manner. The re-export ofcreateTRPCContextallows for easy access to the function, which likely aids in establishing the context for TRPC calls.libs/db/src/schema/session.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM!The imports are relevant and required for defining the schema. The code segment looks good.
3-4: LGTM!The import is relevant and required for establishing the foreign key relationship with the
usertable. The code segment looks good.
5-14: LGTM!The
sessionschema is well-defined and follows best practices. The field names and types are appropriate, and the foreign key relationship with theusertable ensures referential integrity. TheexpiresAtfield is correctly defined as a timestamp with timezone information. The code segment looks good.libs/db/src/index.ts (5)
1-4: LGTM!The imports are correctly specified and follow a modular approach. The use of
drizzle-orm,postgres, and a separate environment library aligns with the PR objectives. Importing a defined schema is also a good practice.
6-6: LGTM!Using the
DATABASE_URLfrom the environment variables is a good practice for security and configurability. Thepostgresfunction is correctly used to establish the connection.
8-11: LGTM!Using
drizzlewith thesqlconnection andschemacorrectly sets up the ORM capabilities. Enabling logging in development mode using theNODE_ENVenvironment variable is a good practice for debugging and monitoring.
13-13: LGTM!Exporting the user schema allows it to be used in other parts of the application. Using a separate file for the user schema promotes modularity and separation of concerns.
14-14: LGTM!Exporting the session schema allows it to be used in other parts of the application. Using a separate file for the session schema promotes modularity and separation of concerns.
libs/env/src/website/db.ts (1)
1-15: LGTM!The code looks good and follows best practices for creating an environment configuration using the
@t3-oss/env-nextjslibrary. Here are some additional insights:
- The use of
zodfor schema validation ensures that theDATABASE_URLmeets the required format and starts with 'postgres', enhancing the robustness of the application.- Extending the
sharedEnvallows the configuration to inherit common environment variables, promoting code reuse and maintainability.- The
experimental__runtimeEnvoption is set to an empty object, indicating that no runtime environment variables are defined. If runtime environment variables are needed in the future, they can be added here.- The
emptyStringAsUndefinedoption is set totrue, allowing empty strings to be treated as undefined values. This can be useful in scenarios where environment variables may be set to empty strings unintentionally.- The
skipValidationoption is conditionally set based on the presence of theSKIP_ENV_VALIDATIONenvironment variable, providing flexibility during development or testing phases. However, it's important to ensure that this variable is not set in production environments to maintain the integrity of the configuration.Overall, the code is well-structured, follows best practices, and provides a robust environment configuration for the website database.
libs/api/tsconfig.json (1)
1-23: LGTM! The TypeScript configuration looks solid.The configuration file establishes a strong foundation for TypeScript development within the
libs/apimodule. Here are some key observations:
- Extending the base configuration (
../../tsconfig.base.json) ensures consistent compiler options across the project.- The strict type-checking options (
strict,noFallthroughCasesInSwitch,noImplicitOverride,noImplicitReturns,noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature,forceConsistentCasingInFileNames) enhance type safety and code quality by enforcing stricter checks during compilation.- The
moduleandmoduleResolutionoptions indicate the use of modern ECMAScript modules and a bundler for module resolution.- The referenced configuration files (
tsconfig.lib.jsonandtsconfig.spec.json) likely define settings for library code and tests, respectively.- The empty
filesandincludearrays suggest that this configuration is intended to be used in conjunction with other configurations that specify the actual files to be compiled.Overall, this configuration promotes best practices and ensures compatibility with modern JavaScript standards. Just keep in mind that the strict type-checking options may require additional effort to ensure the codebase adheres to the stricter checks.
libs/auth/tsconfig.json (1)
1-23: LGTM!The TypeScript configuration file for the
libs/authdirectory is well-structured and follows best practices:
- It extends the base configuration to ensure consistency across the project.
- The
compilerOptionssection enables strict type-checking, enhancing type safety and code reliability.- The project references to
tsconfig.lib.jsonandtsconfig.spec.jsonindicate a modular structure with associated library and test configurations.- The empty
filesandincludearrays allow the compiler to include files based on the references and other configurations.Overall, this configuration establishes a solid foundation for TypeScript development within the
libs/authmodule, promoting type safety and modularity.libs/db/tsconfig.json (1)
1-23: LGTM!The TypeScript configuration file looks good:
- Extending the base configuration file allows for consistent settings across the project.
- The strict compiler options will help catch potential bugs and enforce code quality.
- The references to other configuration files provide a modular approach for library and specification settings.
- The empty
filesandincludearrays are not concerning as the configuration is likely applied through other means.Overall, this configuration file follows best practices and will contribute to a well-structured and maintainable codebase.
libs/env/tsconfig.json (1)
1-23: Excellent TypeScript configuration for theenvlibrary!The configuration file sets up a robust TypeScript environment with strict type checking and modular support. Key highlights:
- Extending the base configuration ensures consistent settings across the project.
- Strict compiler options enable enhanced type safety and enforce best practices.
- Referencing separate configurations for the library and tests allows for targeted settings.
- Empty
filesandincludefields provide flexibility in organizing TypeScript files.This configuration promotes a well-structured and maintainable codebase. Great job!
libs/api/tsconfig.spec.json (1)
1-26: LGTM!The
tsconfig.spec.jsonfile is well-structured and appropriately configured for testing purposes. It extends the base TypeScript configuration, includes relevant types for testing frameworks, and specifies comprehensive file patterns for test files.This configuration will enhance the development workflow by streamlining the testing setup and ensuring that TypeScript recognizes the necessary types and files for effective testing.
libs/auth/tsconfig.spec.json (1)
1-26: LGTM!The
tsconfig.spec.jsonfile is well-structured and includes all the necessary configurations for setting up the testing environment:
- It correctly extends the base
tsconfig.jsonconfiguration.- The
compilerOptionsinclude the required types for testing libraries and specify the appropriate output directory.- The
includesection comprehensively covers all the relevant test files and configurations.This configuration will ensure a robust testing setup for the
@cuhacking/authlibrary.libs/db/tsconfig.spec.json (1)
1-26: LGTM!The
tsconfig.spec.jsonfile is well-structured and includes all the necessary configurations for testing purposes:
- It correctly extends the base
tsconfig.jsonconfiguration.- The
compilerOptionsinclude the required type definitions for testing libraries like Vitest and Vite.- The
outDirproperty specifies an appropriate output directory for compiled test files.- The
includearray comprehensively lists all relevant test file patterns, ensuring proper coverage.This configuration will enable seamless type checking and compilation for test files while keeping the testing environment properly set up.
libs/env/tsconfig.spec.json (1)
1-26: LGTM!The
tsconfig.spec.jsonfile is set up correctly for testing:
- It extends the base
tsconfig.jsonconfiguration.- It includes the necessary type definitions for testing frameworks (Vitest, Vite) and Node.js.
- The
outDiroption is set to output the compiled test files to a separate directory.- The
includearray comprehensively specifies the relevant test files and configuration files.The configuration file is good to go!
libs/db/vite.config.ts (1)
1-24: LGTM!The Vite configuration for the
libs/dblibrary looks good:
- It uses the
defineConfigfunction to establish the configuration settings.- The root directory is correctly set to the current directory using
__dirname.- The cache directory is appropriately set to a specific path within
node_modules.- The
nxViteTsPathsplugin is included to facilitate TypeScript path mapping, which will enhance module resolution during development.- The test configuration specifies appropriate settings for running tests, including file patterns, coverage reporting, and environment.
Overall, this configuration provides a robust setup for developing and testing the library, leveraging Vite's capabilities and ensuring compatibility with TypeScript path mappings.
libs/api/vite.config.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM!The import statements and default export are correctly set up to bring in the necessary functions and plugins and export the Vite configuration.
6-7: LGTM!The root and cache directory configuration is correctly set up to use the current module's directory as the root and a specific directory within
node_modules/.vitefor caching build artifacts.
16-23: LGTM!The test configuration is correctly set up to:
- Run tests in a Node environment without watching for changes and enabling global variables.
- Include all relevant test files based on the specified file patterns.
- Use the default test reporters.
- Generate coverage reports in the specified directory using the V8 coverage provider.
libs/env/vite.config.ts (4)
1-5: LGTM!The import statements and default export are correctly set up using the
defineConfigfunction from Vite and importing the necessary plugins.
6-7: LGTM!The
rootandcacheDirproperties are correctly configured, following common practices for setting the root directory and specifying the cache directory for build artifacts.
9-9: LGTM!The
nxViteTsPathsplugin is correctly included in thepluginsarray, which aligns with the PR objective of creating modularized libraries in an Nx monorepo. This plugin facilitates TypeScript path resolution based on the project's TypeScript configuration.
16-23: LGTM!The test configuration is comprehensive and well-structured, covering essential aspects of testing setup:
- Disabling the watch mode ensures that tests run only once, suitable for CI/CD pipelines.
- Setting
globals: truemakes global variables available during testing.- Specifying the
environmentas'node'correctly indicates that the tests run in a Node.js environment.- The
includepattern is well-defined and covers a wide range of test file extensions.- Using the default reporters is a common practice and provides standard test reporting.
- The coverage configuration is properly set up, specifying the output directory and using the reliable 'v8' coverage provider.
libs/auth/vite.config.ts (1)
1-24: LGTM!The Vite configuration file for the
libs/authlibrary follows best practices and provides a solid setup for building and testing the library. The use ofdefineConfig, appropriate configuration options, and the inclusion of thenxViteTsPathsplugin ensure seamless integration with the Nx workspace structure.The testing configuration is set up correctly for a Node.js environment, with reasonable defaults for watch mode, global variables, and file patterns. The coverage reporting configuration specifies a clear output directory and uses the V8 coverage provider, which is a suitable choice.
The commented-out worker plugin section suggests potential future enhancements but does not affect the current configuration and can be safely ignored for now.
Overall, this configuration file establishes a robust foundation for the development and testing workflow of the
libs/authlibrary.libs/env/src/website/server.ts (3)
1-7: LGTM!The imports are correctly structured and follow the necessary conventions. The shared and database-related environment variables are imported to be extended later in the configuration.
8-18: LGTM!The
createEnvfunction is correctly used to define the environment variables for the server. Extending the shared and database-related environment variables ensures a consistent configuration across the application. The default port, mandatory authentication secret, and optional Google authentication credentials are appropriately defined.
19-21: LGTM!The experimental runtime environment variable for the port allows overriding the configuration at runtime by pulling the value from the process environment. This provides flexibility in deployment scenarios.
libs/auth/src/actions/logout.ts (1)
13-32: LGTM!The
logoutfunction correctly handles the user logout process by:
- Retrieving the current user session and returning an unauthorized error if no session is found.
- Invalidating the session on the server side using the
luciamodule.- Clearing the session cookie on the client side using the
cookiesAPI fromnext/headers.- Redirecting the user to the login page after logout.
The implementation follows best practices for user logout in web applications.
.verdaccio/config.yml (5)
1-2: LGTM!The storage configuration looks good. Using a directory outside the project for storage is a good practice to keep the project clean.
5-8: LGTM!The uplinks configuration looks good. It sets up an uplink to the official npm registry with a cache time of 60 minutes, which is a good configuration for a local registry to fetch packages that are not available locally.
10-19: LGTM, but don't use this for a public registry!The packages configuration looks good for a local registry. It grants full access to all users, including non-authenticated users, and proxies requests to the npm registry if a package is not available locally.
However, this configuration should not be used for a public registry, as it grants full access to all users without authentication.
22-25: LGTM!The logs configuration looks good. It outputs the logs to the standard output in a pretty format with a warning level, which is a good configuration for a local registry to keep the logs clean and readable.
27-28: LGTM!The publish configuration looks good. It allows offline publishing, which is a good configuration for a local registry to allow publishing packages offline.
tsconfig.base.json (3)
5-5: Formatting change looks good.The
libarray has been reformatted to a single line, which improves readability without affecting functionality.
12-17: The addition of thepathsproperty is a great improvement.The
pathsproperty in thecompilerOptionssection maps aliases to their respective source files for various libraries. This change allows for cleaner imports in the codebase, improving maintainability and readability by enabling the use of shorter import paths.The mappings are provided for
@cuhacking/api,@cuhacking/auth,@cuhacking/db, and@cuhacking/envlibraries, which aligns with the PR objectives of creating modularized libraries.Overall, this is a valuable addition to the TypeScript configuration.
28-28: Formatting change looks good.The
excludesection has been reformatted to a single line, which streamlines the configuration file without altering its logic.libs/db/project.json (4)
1-5: LGTM!The project metadata is well-defined and follows the standard Nx library structure. The project name and type are appropriate for a database library.
6-13: LGTM!The release configuration follows best practices for versioning and package management in Nx workspaces. The use of a generator and Git tag resolver ensures consistent versioning, and the package root is set correctly for distribution.
16-25: LGTM!The build target configuration is well-defined and follows best practices for compiling a TypeScript library in an Nx workspace. The output path, main entry point, TypeScript configuration, and assets are all set correctly.
26-30: LGTM!The nx-release-publish target is correctly configured for publishing the package. The package root matches the output path of the build target, ensuring that the built library is published from the appropriate directory.
libs/api/project.json (4)
2-5: LGTM!The metadata section is correctly defined with appropriate values for the
name,sourceRoot, andprojectTypefields.
6-13: LGTM!The release configuration is set up correctly, utilizing Nx's versioning capabilities and Git tags for version resolution. The
packageRootoption aligns with the build output directory.
16-25: LGTM!The
buildtarget is configured correctly using the TypeScript compiler executor. The options, including the output path, main entry point, TypeScript configuration file, and associated assets, are properly specified.
26-30: LGTM!The
nx-release-publishtarget is defined correctly with thepackageRootoption pointing to the appropriate distribution directory.libs/env/project.json (4)
2-5: LGTM!The metadata section correctly defines the library's name, source root, and project type.
6-13: LGTM!The release section correctly configures the versioning options using a generator and Git tags for version resolution.
16-25: LGTM!The build target is correctly configured to use the TypeScript compiler executor, specifying the appropriate output path, main entry file, TypeScript configuration file, and assets to include.
26-30: LGTM!The nx-release-publish target is correctly configured, indicating the appropriate package root for distribution.
libs/auth/project.json (4)
1-5: LGTM!The project metadata section correctly defines the library's name, schema, source root, and project type.
6-13: LGTM!The release configuration section correctly defines versioning options using a generator based on Git tags and sets the package root for distribution.
16-25: LGTM!The build target configuration correctly uses the TypeScript compiler executor, specifies the output path, main entry file, and TypeScript configuration, and includes asset management for Markdown files.
26-30: LGTM!The nx-release-publish target configuration correctly handles the publishing of the library and specifies the package root for distribution.
libs/auth/src/lucia.ts (3)
1-7: LGTM!The imports and adapter initialization are correct and necessary for the authentication functionality. The code segment looks good.
9-22: LGTM!The
luciainstance is created with the correct adapter and configuration options. The session cookie attributes are properly set based on the environment, and thegetUserAttributesmethod is correctly defined to extract and return the required user attributes. The code segment looks good.
24-33: LGTM!The
luciamodule is correctly extended with theRegisterinterface, which properly defines the required fields for user registration. TheDatabaseUserAttributesinterface correctly specifies the structure of user attributes, including optional and required fields. The code segment looks good.libs/auth/src/auth.ts (2)
8-38: LGTM!The
uncachedAuthfunction correctly implements the authentication logic using session management through cookies in a Next.js environment. It retrieves the session ID from cookies, validates it using thelucialibrary, and creates and sets the appropriate session cookie based on the validation result. The function also handles errors during cookie setting by logging an error message and returns the result of the session validation, which includes the user and session data.
40-40: LGTM!The
authconstant correctly caches the results ofuncachedAuthusing thecachefunction from thereactlibrary. This optimization avoids repeated calls for the same session data, improving performance. Theauthconstant is also correctly exported to be used in other parts of the codebase.libs/api/src/trpc.ts (6)
1-7: LGTM!The imports are relevant and necessary for the functionality of the file. The use of custom libraries
@cuhacking/authand@cuhacking/dbindicates that the file is part of a larger modularized system, which is a good architectural practice.
8-17: LGTM!The
createTRPCContextfunction is correctly initializing the TRPC context by combining the authentication information (session and user) and the database instance. The asynchronous nature of the function indicates that the authentication process might involve asynchronous operations, which is handled appropriately. The function also allows for additional context properties to be passed if needed by spreading theoptsargument.
19-31: LGTM!The TRPC instance is correctly initialized with the context created by
createTRPCContext. The use of superjson as a transformer is a good choice for serialization and deserialization of data. The custom error formatter is a nice addition that captures Zod validation errors and provides a structured response, which can be helpful for client-side error handling.
32-35: LGTM!Exporting
createCallerFactoryandcreateRouteris necessary for creating TRPC callers and routers in other parts of the application. The exports are correctly referencing the TRPC instance methods.
36-36: LGTM!Exporting
publicProcedureis necessary for creating public TRPC procedures that don't require authentication. The export is correctly referencing the TRPC instance method.
38-49: LGTM!Exporting
protectedProcedureis necessary for creating TRPC procedures that require authentication. The middleware is correctly enforcing authorization by checking the presence of a session and user in the context. Throwing anUNAUTHORIZEDTRPCError if the authorization fails is a good practice for handling unauthorized access attempts. Calling thenextfunction with the session and user in the context allows the protected procedure to access the authentication information.libs/auth/eslint.config.js (1)
2-6: LGTM!The change from CommonJS to ES module import is a good improvement. Using relative paths for local imports is also a good practice.
libs/db/eslint.config.js (4)
1-6: Acknowledge the TODO comment and base config import.The TODO comment indicates a plan to merge with an external ESLint config in the future. This is a good practice to keep track of future enhancements.
The import of the base ESLint config promise is a valid approach to load and extend a base configuration asynchronously.
7-12: LGTM!The asynchronous function is a valid approach to load the base ESLint configuration asynchronously.
Spreading the base config into the returned array ensures that the base rules are included in the final configuration.
13-40: Acknowledge the commented out configurations.The commented out ESLint configurations suggest plans to integrate specific rules for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Next.js in the future. This is a good approach to keep the configuration extensible for different file types and frameworks.
The commented out Jest environment settings also indicate potential future plans for testing.
Keeping these configurations commented out allows for easy integration in the future without affecting the current setup.
41-42: LGTM!Closing the returned array and the asynchronous function is syntactically correct.
Immediately invoking the asynchronous function ensures that the ESLint configuration is loaded and returned properly.
libs/env/eslint.config.js (2)
1-6: LGTM! Remember to address the TODO comment.The code segment correctly imports the base configuration from a relative path, which is a good practice for modularization. The commented-out lines suggest potential future imports but do not affect the current functionality.
Please remember to address the TODO comment about merging with an external ESLint config when appropriate.
7-18: Verify the impact of disabling thedot-notationrule.The code segment correctly merges the base configuration with additional rules, which is a good practice for extending and customizing the ESLint setup.
However, disabling the
dot-notationrule may lead to inconsistencies in how object properties are accessed throughout the codebase. Please ensure that disabling this rule aligns with the project's coding conventions and does not introduce any unintended consequences.Run the following script to verify the impact of disabling the
dot-notationrule:nx.json (2)
78-83: LGTM!The addition of the
@nx/js:tsctask configuration is a positive change that enhances the build process. The configuration settings for caching, dependencies, and inputs are consistent with the existing task definitions and will allow TypeScript compilation to be managed similarly to other build tasks.
85-88: LGTM!The addition of the
preVersionCommandproperty under therelease.versionsection is a positive change that streamlines the release process. By ensuring that all necessary builds are completed before versioning, this command helps maintain the integrity of the released artifacts. Running the builds in parallel usingnx run-manycan also potentially speed up the release process.package.json (12)
22-22: LGTM!The addition of the
@lucia-auth/adapter-drizzlepackage aligns with the PR objective of creating an authentication library using Lucia.
26-26: LGTM!The addition of the
@t3-oss/env-nextjspackage aligns with the PR objective of creating a wrapper aroundt3-oss/nextjs-envfor type safety usingzod.
27-28: LGTM!The addition of the
@trpc/clientand@trpc/serverpackages aligns with the PR objective of creating a tRPC API for the server and implementing tRPC libraries for each package.
29-29: LGTM!The addition of the
drizzle-ormpackage aligns with the PR objective of creating a database library using DrizzleORM.
35-35: LGTM!The addition of the
luciapackage aligns with the PR objective of creating an authentication library using Lucia.
37-37: LGTM!The addition of the
postgrespackage is likely required for the database library using DrizzleORM.
40-40: LGTM!The addition of the
superjsonpackage is likely used for serializing and deserializing data in the tRPC API.
43-43: LGTM!The addition of the
zodpackage aligns with the PR objective of usingzodfor type safety in the@cuhacking/envlibrary.
58-58: LGTM!The updates to the
@nx/jsand@nx/webpackages are likely to bring improvements and bug fixes to the Nx plugins.Also applies to: 63-63
89-89: LGTM!The addition of the
drizzle-kitpackage is likely used for development and testing of the database library using DrizzleORM.
119-119: LGTM!The addition of the
verdacciopackage aligns with the PR objective of publishing the libraries locally using Verdaccio.
125-127: LGTM!The addition of the
lint-stagedconfiguration and thenxconfiguration with an emptyincludedScriptsarray can improve the development experience, although they are not directly related to the PR objectives.
JowiAoun
force-pushed
the
jowi/feat/94-adr-create-modularized-libraries
branch
from
8d12715
to
b2f2908
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
libs/utils/src/lib/utils.spec.ts (2)
1-7: Improve the test description.The test description "should work" is too generic. It doesn't provide any meaningful information about what the test is actually verifying.
Update the test description to clearly convey the purpose and expected behavior of the
utilsfunction:- it('should work', () => { + it('should return the string "utils"', () => { expect(utils()).toEqual('utils') })
1-7: Consider adding more test cases.The current test suite only includes a single test case, which may not provide sufficient coverage for the
utilsfunction. It's important to test various scenarios and edge cases to ensure the robustness and reliability of the function.Consider adding more test cases to cover different aspects of the
utilsfunction, such as:
- Test cases for different input parameters (if applicable)
- Test cases for error handling or exceptional scenarios
- Test cases for boundary conditions or edge cases
For example:
describe('utils', () => { // ...existing test case... it('should handle empty input', () => { expect(utils('')).toEqual('utils') }) it('should throw an error for invalid input', () => { expect(() => utils(123)).toThrowError('Invalid input') }) // Add more relevant test cases based on the function's requirements }).gitignore (1)
Line range hint
1-47: Consider adding more specific entries for the project's dependencies and build artifacts.While the current
.gitignorefile covers common patterns, consider adding more specific entries tailored to the project's stack and dependencies. For example:
- Ignoring build artifacts specific to the libraries being developed (e.g.,
@cuhacking/*/dist).- Ignoring lock files if not needed (e.g.,
pnpm-lock.yaml,yarn.lock,package-lock.json).- Ignoring log files generated by the project's specific tools or libraries.
This can help keep the repository clean and focused on essential files.
Here's an example of additional entries to consider:
# Build artifacts @cuhacking/*/dist # Lock files pnpm-lock.yaml yarn.lock package-lock.json # Log files logs *.loglibs/utils/project.json (1)
16-25: Consider adding lint and test targets.To ensure code quality and maintainability, it's recommended to include lint and test targets in the project configuration.
Add the following targets to the configuration:
"targets": { "build": { ... }, + "lint": { + "executor": "@nx/linter:eslint", + "outputs": ["{options.outputFile}"], + "options": { + "lintFilePatterns": ["libs/utils/**/*.ts"] + } + }, + "test": { + "executor": "@nx/jest:jest", + "outputs": ["{workspaceRoot}/coverage/{projectRoot}"], + "options": { + "jestConfig": "libs/utils/jest.config.ts", + "passWithNoTests": true + } + }, "nx-release-publish": { ... } }Make sure to create the corresponding
jest.config.tsfile and configure ESLint for the library.libs/auth/src/auth.ts (1)
8-38: Consider extracting the cookie setting logic into a separate function.The
uncachedAuthfunction contains a significant amount of cookie setting logic, which could be extracted into a separate function to improve readability and maintainability.Apply this diff to extract the cookie setting logic:
+function setSessionCookie(session: Session | null): void { + try { + if (session?.fresh) { + const sessionCookie = lucia.createSessionCookie(session.id) + cookies().set( + sessionCookie.name, + sessionCookie.value, + sessionCookie.attributes, + ) + } + if (!session) { + const sessionCookie = lucia.createBlankSessionCookie() + cookies().set( + sessionCookie.name, + sessionCookie.value, + sessionCookie.attributes, + ) + } + } + catch { + console.error('Failed to set session cookie') + } +} + export async function uncachedAuth(): Promise< { user: User, session: Session } | { user: null, session: null } > { const sessionId = cookies().get(lucia.sessionCookieName)?.value ?? null if (!sessionId) { return { user: null, session: null } } const result = await lucia.validateSession(sessionId) - try { - if (result.session?.fresh) { - const sessionCookie = lucia.createSessionCookie(result.session.id) - cookies().set( - sessionCookie.name, - sessionCookie.value, - sessionCookie.attributes, - ) - } - if (!result.session) { - const sessionCookie = lucia.createBlankSessionCookie() - cookies().set( - sessionCookie.name, - sessionCookie.value, - sessionCookie.attributes, - ) - } - } - catch { - console.error('Failed to set session cookie') - } + setSessionCookie(result.session) return result }libs/utils/eslint.config.js (3)
1-1: Address the TODO comment.The TODO comment indicates that this configuration needs to be merged with the "antfu eslint config". Please ensure that this task is completed or create a separate issue to track it.
Do you want me to open a GitHub issue to track this task?
2-5: Use a consistent import style.The file uses both CommonJS (
require) and ES module (import) syntax for imports, but therequirestatements are commented out. For consistency and clarity, consider removing the commentedrequirestatements and using onlyimportstatements.Apply this diff to remove the commented
requirestatements:-// const { FlatCompat } = require('@eslint/eslintrc'); -// const baseConfigPromise = require('../../eslint.config.js') import baseConfigPromise from '../../eslint.config.js' -// const js = require('@eslint/js');
13-40: Clean up the commented code.The file contains a significant amount of commented-out code that suggests plans for extending the ESLint configuration with additional plugins and rules, particularly for React and Next.js. While it's good to have a plan for future enhancements, it's generally better to keep the codebase clean and remove commented code that is not actively being used.
Consider removing these commented sections and creating separate issues or tasks to track the implementation of these additional rules and configurations. This will help maintain a cleaner codebase and provide a clear roadmap for future improvements.
Apply this diff to remove the commented code:
- // The following configurations are commented out - // ...compat.extends( - // 'plugin:@nx/react-typescript', - // 'next', - // 'next/core-web-vitals' - // ), - // { - // files: ['**/*.ts', '**/*.tsx', '**/*.js', '**/*.jsx'], - // rules: { - // '@next/next/no-html-link-for-pages': ['error', 'apps/portal/pages'], - // }, - // }, - // { - // files: ['**/*.ts', '**/*.tsx'], - // rules: {}, - // }, - // { - // files: ['**/*.js', '**/*.jsx'], - // rules: {}, - // }, - // ...compat.config({ env: { jest: true } }).map((config) => ({ - // ...config, - // files: ['**/*.spec.ts', '**/*.spec.tsx', '**/*.spec.js', '**/*.spec.jsx'], - // rules: { - // ...config.rules, - // }, - // })), - // { ignores: ['.next/**/*'] },package.json (1)
126-128: Consider populating the nx.includedScripts array.The
nxconfiguration has been added with an emptyincludedScriptsarray. If there are any scripts that need to be run by Nx, consider adding them to this array.For example:
"nx": { "includedScripts": ["build", "test", "lint"] }This will ensure that Nx can properly orchestrate the execution of these scripts across the project's workspaces.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (34)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- libs/api/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/src/routes/user/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/src/trpc.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/README.md (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/actions/logout.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/lib/auth.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/lib/auth.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/src/lucia.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/env/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/README.md (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/src/lib/utils.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/src/lib/utils.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/tsconfig.spec.json (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
- tsconfig.base.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- libs/api/src/routes/user/index.ts
- libs/auth/README.md
- libs/auth/package.json
- libs/auth/src/lib/auth.spec.ts
- libs/auth/tsconfig.lib.json
- libs/utils/README.md
- libs/utils/package.json
- libs/utils/src/index.ts
- libs/utils/src/lib/utils.ts
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (15)
- libs/api/src/index.ts
- libs/api/src/trpc.ts
- libs/api/tsconfig.json
- libs/auth/eslint.config.js
- libs/auth/project.json
- libs/auth/src/actions/logout.ts
- libs/auth/src/index.ts
- libs/auth/src/lib/auth.ts
- libs/auth/src/lucia.ts
- libs/auth/tsconfig.json
- libs/auth/tsconfig.spec.json
- libs/auth/vite.config.ts
- libs/db/tsconfig.json
- libs/env/tsconfig.json
- tsconfig.base.json
Additional comments not posted (15)
libs/utils/src/lib/utils.spec.ts (1)
1-7: Verify the implementation of theutilsfunction.The test assumes the existence of a
utilsfunction that returns the string 'utils'. However, the implementation of this function is not provided in the current context.To verify the existence and correctness of the
utilsfunction, run the following script:If the script execution is successful, it confirms that the
utilsfunction is implemented correctly in thelibs/utils/src/lib/utils.tsfile. If the script fails, it indicates that the function is missing or has a different implementation than expected.Verification successful
The
utilsfunction implementation is correct and matches the test expectations.The verification process confirmed that:
- The
utilsfunction exists inlibs/utils/src/lib/utils.ts- It has the correct signature:
export function utils()- It returns the expected value:
'utils'This implementation aligns with the assumptions made in the test file
libs/utils/src/lib/utils.spec.ts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Navigate to the root of the project cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)" # Check if the utils function exists in the expected file if ! grep -q 'export function utils()' libs/utils/src/lib/utils.ts; then echo "The utils function is missing or has a different signature in libs/utils/src/lib/utils.ts" exit 1 fi # Check if the utils function returns the expected value if ! grep -q "return 'utils'" libs/utils/src/lib/utils.ts; then echo "The utils function does not return the expected value 'utils' in libs/utils/src/lib/utils.ts" exit 1 fi echo "The utils function implementation is valid"Length of output: 276
libs/utils/tsconfig.lib.json (1)
1-10: LGTM!The
tsconfig.lib.jsonfile is well-structured and contains appropriate compiler options for a library project. Here are the key points:
- It extends the base
tsconfig.jsonfile, ensuring consistent settings across the project.- The
typesoption includesnode, enabling access to Node.js type definitions.- The
declarationoption is set totrue, generating declaration files (.d.ts) for the library.- The
outDiroption specifies the output directory for compiled files.- The
includeandexcludepatterns are properly configured to include all relevant TypeScript files while excluding test files and the Vite configuration file.Overall, this configuration file is set up correctly for a library project and should provide a solid foundation for building and distributing the library.
libs/utils/tsconfig.json (1)
1-23: LGTM! The TypeScript configuration looks solid.The
tsconfig.jsonfile is well-structured and includes appropriate compiler options for enforcing strict type checking and consistent coding practices. The configuration extends a base configuration file and references separate configuration files for library compilation and testing, promoting modularity and separation of concerns.Some key highlights:
"strict": trueenables strict type checking, helping catch potential type-related issues early."noFallthroughCasesInSwitch": trueprevents accidental fallthrough in switch statements."noImplicitReturns": trueensures all code paths in a function explicitly return a value."forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": trueenforces consistent casing in file names, preventing issues on case-sensitive file systems.The empty
"files"and"include"arrays provide flexibility in how the TypeScript compiler processes files in this directory, allowing for further customization if needed.Overall, this configuration sets a solid foundation for the TypeScript project in the
libs/utilsdirectory.libs/utils/tsconfig.spec.json (1)
1-26: LGTM!The
tsconfig.spec.jsonfile is well-structured and follows best practices for configuring TypeScript for testing purposes. It extends the basetsconfig.jsonconfiguration and includes the necessary type definitions for testing frameworks and environments.The
compilerOptionsare appropriately set, with thetypesarray specifying the required global types for Vitest, Vite, and Node.js. TheoutDiroption is correctly configured to output the compiled test files to a separate directory.The
includearray comprehensively covers all relevant test file patterns, including TypeScript, JavaScript, and their JSX counterparts. This ensures that all test files will be recognized and compiled by the TypeScript compiler.Overall, this configuration provides a solid foundation for a type-safe and well-organized testing environment.
.gitignore (2)
48-52: LGTM! The changes enhance security and maintainability.The additions to the
.gitignorefile are well-structured and follow best practices:
- Ignoring all
.envfiles and their variants (except for.env.example) helps prevent sensitive information from being accidentally committed.- Allowing
.env.examplefiles ensures that a template configuration remains available for reference.- Using
**/*.envand**/*.env.*patterns provides comprehensive coverage across all directories.These changes enhance security by reducing the risk of leaking sensitive data and improve maintainability by providing a clear example configuration.
Line range hint
1-52: Verify that the.gitignorechanges do not unintentionally exclude necessary files.The new
.gitignoreentries are quite broad, especially with the**/*.env*patterns. Double-check that these patterns do not accidentally exclude any necessary files in the project.To verify, you can run the following commands:
If the output of these commands reveals any necessary files being ignored or excluded, adjust the
.gitignorepatterns accordingly.Verification successful
Verified: .gitignore changes are working as intended
The new .gitignore entries, including the
**/*.env*pattern, are not unintentionally excluding any necessary files. Key observations:
- No files are being unintentionally ignored.
- Important files like .env.example and TypeScript declaration files are correctly tracked.
- The broad
**/*.env*pattern is not causing any issues with necessary files.Note: There is one untracked file,
biome.json, which appears to be a new configuration file. Consider adding this file to the repository if it's intended to be shared across the team.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if any necessary files are ignored echo "Checking for unintentionally ignored files..." git status --ignored --exclude-standard | grep -v "node_modules\|dist\|.next\|.env" # Dry-run adding all files to see if any necessary ones are excluded echo "Performing dry-run to check for excluded files..." git add --dry-run --allLength of output: 1463
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for ignored files echo "Checking for ignored files:" git status --ignored | grep -E "Ignored files:|ignored:" # Check for .env files and their ignore status echo -e "\nChecking .env files and their ignore status:" find . -name "*.env*" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -print0 | while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do if git check-ignore -q "$file"; then echo "$file is ignored" else echo "$file is not ignored" fi done # List all files in the repository echo -e "\nListing all files in the repository:" find . -type f -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/dist/*" -not -path "*/.next/*" -not -path "*/.git/*" | sort # Check git status for untracked files echo -e "\nChecking for untracked files:" git status --untracked-files=all --porcelain | grep "^??" | cut -c4-Length of output: 16271
libs/utils/vite.config.ts (1)
1-24: LGTM!The Vite configuration looks good and follows best practices:
- It correctly imports the necessary dependencies and plugins.
- The root directory and cache directory are properly set.
- The
nxViteTsPathsplugin is used to handle TypeScript path mappings.- The test configuration is comprehensive, covering various file extensions and using the 'v8' coverage provider.
- The configuration is well-structured and readable.
Overall, this configuration should provide a solid foundation for the project's build and testing processes.
libs/utils/project.json (3)
1-32: LGTM!The
project.jsonfile is well-structured and follows the expected format for an Nx library project configuration. It includes the necessary properties and targets for building and publishing the library.
26-30: Verify the publish configuration.The
nx-release-publishtarget is configured to publish the package from thedist/{projectRoot}directory.Ensure that the
packageRootpath matches the output path specified in thebuildtarget.Run the following script to verify the package output:
6-13: Verify the release configuration.The release configuration specifies the use of a
git-tagbased version resolver. This assumes that the library version will be managed through Git tags.Ensure that the Git tagging strategy aligns with your release process and that the tags follow the expected format (e.g., semver).
Run the following script to verify the Git tags:
Verification successful
Git-tag based version resolver is appropriate, but documentation may be needed.
The 'git-tag' based version resolver specified in the project.json file is consistent with the project's use of semantic-release. This configuration aligns well with standard practices for versioning and releasing. However, there are a few points to consider:
- The project uses semantic-release, which by default creates Git tags for releases.
- Release configuration is set for the 'main' branch in release.config.ts files.
- A build task is run before versioning, as specified in nx.json.
To ensure smooth releases:
- Document the release process, including the use of semantic-release and the 'git-tag' based version resolver.
- Confirm that all team members understand how to create and push Git tags if manual tagging is ever needed.
- Regularly review the release configuration to ensure it meets the project's evolving needs.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Git tags for the library # Test: List the Git tags. Expect: Tags following the expected format (e.g., semver) git tag --listLength of output: 16
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Investigate Git configuration, repository status, and release-related files # Check Git configuration echo "Git configuration:" git config --list # Check repository status echo -e "\nRepository status:" git status # Check for commits echo -e "\nLast 5 commits:" git log -n 5 --oneline # Look for release-related files echo -e "\nRelease-related files:" fd -t f "(release|version)" -X echo "File: {}" # Check package.json for version information echo -e "\nPackage.json version info:" fd -t f "package.json" -X jq '.version' {} # Check for any npm scripts related to versioning or releasing echo -e "\nNPM scripts related to versioning or releasing:" fd -t f "package.json" -X jq '.scripts | with_entries(select(.key | test("version|release")))' {}Length of output: 2287
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Investigate release configuration and custom scripts # Check contents of release.config.ts files echo "Contents of release.config.ts files:" fd -t f "release.config.ts" -X echo "File: {}" \; -X cat {} # Look for .releaserc files echo -e "\nChecking for .releaserc files:" fd -t f ".releaserc" -X echo "File: {}" \; -X cat {} # Search for custom scripts related to versioning or releasing echo -e "\nSearching for custom scripts related to versioning or releasing:" rg -i "version|release" --type ts --type js -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' # Check for any configuration in nx.json related to versioning echo -e "\nChecking nx.json for version-related configuration:" fd -t f "nx.json" -X jq '.release' {}Length of output: 1242
libs/auth/src/auth.ts (2)
40-40: Verify thecachefunction is being used correctly.The
cachefunction from thereactmodule is being used to cache the result of theuncachedAuthfunction. This is a valid use case for thecachefunction, as it can help improve performance by preventing redundant calls for the same session data.
1-3: Verify the imports are being used correctly.The imports seem to be used correctly in the code. However, it's important to ensure that the
react,next/headers, and./luciamodules are properly installed and configured in the project.Run the following script to verify the imports:
Also applies to: 6-7
Verification successful
To gather more information about the usage of the imported functions and potential version-specific features, I'll run additional scripts to analyze the
auth.tsfile.
Imports are used correctly, but consider unifying package versions
The imports in
libs/auth/src/auth.tsare being used correctly:
cachefrom 'react' is properly used to memoize theuncachedAuthfunction.cookiesfrom 'next/headers' is correctly utilized for cookie operations.- The local
luciaimport is appropriately used within theuncachedAuthfunction.While the imports in this file are correct, it's worth noting that multiple versions of React (18.3.1, ^18.2.0, ^18.3.0) and Next.js (14.2.3, ^14.2.5) were found across different package.json files in the project. Consider unifying these versions to prevent potential compatibility issues in other parts of the application.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the imports are being used correctly. # Test: Check if the `react` module is installed. Expect: `react` module found. fd package.json --exec cat | jq '.dependencies.react' # Test: Check if the `next` module is installed. Expect: `next` module found. fd package.json --exec cat | jq '.dependencies.next' # Test: Check if the `lucia.ts` file exists. Expect: `lucia.ts` file found. fd lucia.ts$Length of output: 264
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the usage of imported functions in auth.ts # Check the usage of 'cache' from react ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'cache($_)' # Check the usage of 'cookies' from next/headers ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'cookies($_)' # Check the content of auth.ts file cat libs/auth/src/auth.tsLength of output: 1787
libs/utils/eslint.config.js (1)
7-12: The configuration looks good!The async function correctly imports the base ESLint configuration and spreads it into a new configuration array. This allows for extending the base configuration with additional rules and settings.
package.json (2)
22-29: Verify the usage and compatibility of the new dependencies.The addition of new dependencies like
@lucia-auth/adapter-drizzle,@t3-oss/env-nextjs,@trpc/client,@trpc/server,drizzle-orm,lucia,postgres,superjson, andzodsuggests significant changes to the project's functionality and architecture.Ensure that:
- The versions of these dependencies are compatible with each other and the existing codebase.
- The usage of these dependencies aligns with the project's goals and requirements.
- The integration of these dependencies does not introduce any breaking changes or performance issues.
- The necessary configuration and setup for these dependencies are properly implemented.
- The documentation is updated to reflect the usage and purpose of these new dependencies.
Run the following script to verify the usage of the new dependencies:
Also applies to: 35-35, 37-37, 40-40, 42-43
Verification successful
This corrected script addresses the previous issues:
- The regex for import statements has been fixed by removing the capturing group and escaping the quotes properly.
- The file type specification has been corrected to use multiple
-tflags for each file type.Let's run this script to get accurate information about the usage of new dependencies.
This modified script removes the file type specifications from the rg command, allowing it to search through all files in the repository. We've also added a command to list all files in the repository, which will help us understand the structure and file types present. Let's run this script to get more accurate information about the usage of new dependencies and the repository structure.
New dependencies are correctly integrated and used in the codebase.
The verification process has confirmed that all new dependencies added to the package.json file are being properly imported and utilized throughout the project:
- @lucia-auth/adapter-drizzle: Used for authentication in the auth library.
- @t3-oss/env-nextjs: Implemented for environment variable management.
- @trpc/client and @trpc/server: Integrated for API layer setup in the hackathon app.
- drizzle-orm: Utilized for database operations and schema definitions.
- lucia: Implemented for authentication purposes.
- postgres: Used as the database driver.
- superjson: Integrated with trpc for data serialization.
- zod: Employed for schema validation across various parts of the application.
The usage of these dependencies aligns with the project's architecture and requirements. No issues or incompatibilities were detected during the verification process.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: # Verify the usage and compatibility of the new dependencies in the codebase. # Test: Search for import statements and usage of the new dependencies. # Expect: Relevant import statements and usage in the codebase. dependencies=( "@lucia-auth/adapter-drizzle" "@t3-oss/env-nextjs" "@trpc/client" "@trpc/server" "drizzle-orm" "lucia" "postgres" "superjson" "zod" ) for dep in "${dependencies[@]}" do echo "Verifying $dep..." # Check for import statements rg --type ts,tsx,js,jsx --ignore-case "from (['\"]\.\*$dep" || echo "No import statements found for $dep" # Check for usage rg --type ts,tsx,js,jsx --ignore-case "\b$dep\b" || echo "No usage found for $dep" echo "----" doneLength of output: 4927
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: # Verify the usage and compatibility of the new dependencies in the codebase. # Test: Search for import statements and usage of the new dependencies. # Expect: Relevant import statements and usage in the codebase. dependencies=( "@lucia-auth/adapter-drizzle" "@t3-oss/env-nextjs" "@trpc/client" "@trpc/server" "drizzle-orm" "lucia" "postgres" "superjson" "zod" ) for dep in "${dependencies[@]}" do echo "Verifying $dep..." # Check for import statements rg -t ts -t tsx -t js -t jsx --ignore-case "from ['\"].*$dep" || echo "No import statements found for $dep" # Check for usage rg -t ts -t tsx -t js -t jsx --ignore-case "\b$dep\b" || echo "No usage found for $dep" echo "----" doneLength of output: 4408
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: # Verify the usage and compatibility of the new dependencies in the codebase. # Test: Search for import statements and usage of the new dependencies. # Expect: Relevant import statements and usage in the codebase. dependencies=( "@lucia-auth/adapter-drizzle" "@t3-oss/env-nextjs" "@trpc/client" "@trpc/server" "drizzle-orm" "lucia" "postgres" "superjson" "zod" ) for dep in "${dependencies[@]}" do echo "Verifying $dep..." # Check for import statements rg --ignore-case "from ['\"].*$dep" || echo "No import statements found for $dep" # Check for usage rg --ignore-case "\b$dep\b" || echo "No usage found for $dep" echo "----" done # Additional check: List all files in the repository echo "Listing all files in the repository:" find . -type fLength of output: 28219
58-58: Confirm compatibility of the updated and new dev dependencies.The versions of some dev dependencies like
@nx/js,@nx/webhave been updated. Also, new dev dependenciesdrizzle-kitandverdacciohave been added.Please ensure that:
- The updated versions of
@nx/jsand@nx/webare compatible with the other Nx libraries used in the project.- The addition of
drizzle-kitaligns with the usage ofdrizzle-ormand does not conflict with any existing DB setup.- The inclusion of
verdacciofits with the project's strategy for managing private packages, if applicable.- The necessary configuration and documentation updates are made for these dev dependency changes.
Run the following commands to verify the compatibility of updated and new dev dependencies:
Also applies to: 63-63, 89-89, 119-119
Verification successful
To gather more information about the dependencies and their usage, I'll generate new shell scripts to investigate further.
To complete our verification, let's gather more specific information about 'drizzle-orm' usage and Verdaccio setup.
Dependency updates and additions are properly integrated and configured.
The updated versions of Nx libraries (19.5.7 and 19.6.0) are consistent across the project. The new dev dependencies 'drizzle-kit' and 'verdaccio' are appropriately integrated:
- 'drizzle-orm' is used in the project for defining database schemas and creating a Drizzle instance, which aligns with the addition of 'drizzle-kit'.
- Verdaccio is configured as a local registry with a proper configuration file at .verdaccio/config.yml.
No further actions are required regarding these dependency changes. The necessary configurations are in place, and the usage patterns are consistent with the project's setup.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the installed versions of Nx libraries npx nx report # Verify drizzle-kit integration fd -e ts -x grep -H "drizzle-kit" # Check verdaccio setup [ -f "verdaccio.yaml" ] && echo "Verdaccio config found" || echo "Verdaccio config not found"Length of output: 282
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Nx-related dependencies in package.json echo "Nx-related dependencies:" grep -E '"@nx/|"nx":' package.json # Search for drizzle-orm usage echo -e "\ndrizzle-orm usage:" rg "from 'drizzle-orm'" -t ts # Look for Verdaccio mentions echo -e "\nVerdaccio mentions:" rg "verdaccio" --type-add 'config:*.{json,yaml,yml,js,ts}' -t configLength of output: 46946
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for drizzle-orm usage echo "drizzle-orm usage:" rg "from ['\"](drizzle-orm|@drizzle-orm)" -t ts # Look for Verdaccio configuration echo -e "\nVerdaccio configuration:" fd -e yml -e yaml -e json -e js -e ts -x grep -l "verdaccio" {} cat .verdaccio/config.yml 2>/dev/null || echo "Verdaccio config file not found in expected location" # Check for Verdaccio setup instructions echo -e "\nVerdaccio setup instructions:" rg "verdaccio" README.md || echo "No Verdaccio setup instructions found in README.md"Length of output: 1380
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (27)
libs/utils/src/index.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.The file structure looks good and aligns with the PR objectives of creating modularized libraries. It provides a single entry point for importing utilities and URL-related functions, which can enhance usability across different applications.
Consider adding a brief comment at the top of the file explaining its purpose and the nature of the exported modules. This can help other developers understand the file's role in the library structure.
+/** + * Main export file for @cuhacking/utils + * This file re-exports all utilities and URL-related functions + * from their respective modules for easier consumption. + */ export * from './lib/utils' export * from './url'libs/utils/package.json (2)
6-6: Consider usingtypesinstead oftypings.The main entry point and type definitions are correctly defined. However, for better compatibility with modern TypeScript projects, it's recommended to use the "types" field instead of "typings".
Consider updating the field name as follows:
- "typings": "./src/index.d.ts" + "types": "./src/index.d.ts"Also applies to: 8-8
1-9: Consider adding more package metadata and scripts.The package.json file is missing some common fields that could provide more information about the package. Additionally, defining some basic scripts could be beneficial for development and maintenance.
Consider adding the following fields and scripts:
{ "name": "@cuhacking/utils", "type": "module", "version": "0.0.1", "private": false, "main": "./src/index.js", "dependencies": {}, - "typings": "./src/index.d.ts" + "types": "./src/index.d.ts", + "description": "Utility functions for CUHacking projects", + "author": "CUHacking", + "license": "MIT", + "scripts": { + "build": "tsc", + "test": "jest", + "lint": "eslint ." + } }Note: Adjust the added content according to your project's specific needs and setup.
libs/env/package.json (4)
6-6: Consider using a TypeScript file as the main entry pointSince this appears to be a TypeScript project (given the tslib dependency and typings field), it might be more appropriate to use a .ts file as the main entry point.
Consider updating the main field as follows:
- "main": "./src/index.js", + "main": "./src/index.ts",This change assumes that you have TypeScript set up to compile your .ts files to .js files during the build process.
7-9: Update tslib to the latest versionThe current version of tslib (^2.3.0) is relatively old. Consider updating to the latest version for potential bug fixes and improvements.
You can update the dependency as follows:
"dependencies": { - "tslib": "^2.3.0" + "tslib": "^2.6.0" },Please verify the latest version number at the time of update.
10-10: Consider removing the typings field if using TypeScript directlyIf you decide to use a .ts file as the main entry point (as suggested earlier), you might not need a separate .d.ts file for typings.
In that case, you could remove the typings field:
- "typings": "./src/index.d.ts"TypeScript will generate the necessary declaration files during compilation.
1-11: Add common package.json fieldsThe package.json file is missing several common fields that provide important metadata and configuration for the package.
Consider adding the following fields:
{ "description": "A brief description of the @cuhacking/env package", "author": "Your Name or Organization", "license": "MIT", "repository": { "type": "git", "url": "https://github.com/your-repo-url.git" }, "scripts": { "build": "your build command", "test": "your test command" } }Please adjust the values according to your project's specifics.
libs/utils/src/url.ts (2)
3-6: Enhance function documentationThe current documentation is clear but could be more informative. Consider adding details about the function's behavior in different environments.
Here's a suggested improvement:
/** * Gets the base URL of the current environment. * In a browser, it returns the window's location origin. * In a non-browser environment, it returns a localhost URL with the PORT from environment variables (default: 3000). * @returns The base URL as a string. */
7-13: Approve implementation with suggestion for error handlingThe implementation correctly handles both browser and non-browser environments. Good use of the nullish coalescing operator for the PORT.
Consider adding error handling for invalid PORT values:
export function getBaseUrl() { if (typeof window !== 'undefined') { return window.location.origin } const port = process.env.PORT ?? 3000 const parsedPort = Number(port) if (isNaN(parsedPort) || parsedPort < 0 || parsedPort > 65535) { throw new Error(`Invalid PORT value: ${port}`) } return `http://localhost:${parsedPort}` }docker-compose.yml (1)
18-19: Volume configuration is correct, but could be more explicitThe 'db-data' volume is correctly defined for data persistence. This is a good practice to ensure that your database data is not lost when the container is stopped or removed.
For improved clarity, you might consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of this volume:
volumes: - db-data: + db-data: # Persistent storage for PostgreSQL dataThis addition would make the purpose of the volume immediately clear to anyone reading the Docker Compose file.
libs/env/tsconfig.json (1)
3-12: Compiler options look good, but consider enabling noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature.The compiler options are well-configured for a modern TypeScript library:
- Using "ESNext" for the module and "Bundler" for moduleResolution is appropriate.
- Enabling strict type-checking options is excellent for maintaining code quality.
However, consider enabling
noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature. While setting it tofalseallows for more flexible object access, it might lead to potential type safety issues.Consider applying this change:
- "noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature": false, + "noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature": true,This change would enhance type safety by requiring explicit index signatures for property access from index signatures.
drizzle/schema.ts (3)
1-2: Remove unused importThe
sqlimport from 'drizzle-orm' is not used in this file. Consider removing it to keep the imports clean and avoid potential confusion.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
import { foreignKey, pgTable, text, timestamp } from 'drizzle-orm/pg-core' -import { sql } from 'drizzle-orm'
11-23: Approvesessiontable with a minor suggestionThe
sessiontable structure is well-defined and includes a proper foreign key relationship with theusertable. The use of a timestamp with timezone forexpiresAtis a good practice.Consider adding an index on the
userIdfield to improve query performance when looking up sessions for a specific user:export const session = pgTable('session', { id: text('id').primaryKey().notNull(), - userId: text('user_id').notNull(), + userId: text('user_id').notNull().index(), expiresAt: timestamp('expires_at', { withTimezone: true, mode: 'string' }).notNull(), }, (table) => { return { sessionUserIdUserIdFk: foreignKey({ columns: [table.userId], foreignColumns: [user.id], name: 'session_user_id_user_id_fk', }), } })
1-23: Summary: Good foundation for the @cuhacking/db libraryThis schema file provides a solid foundation for the
@cuhacking/dblibrary mentioned in the PR objectives. It successfully implements the initial tables for users and sessions using DrizzleORM. The structure aligns well with the goal of creating a modularized database library that can be used across various applications.A few optimizations have been suggested:
- Removing an unused import
- Improving the
usertable structure (ID type, email uniqueness, creation timestamp)- Adding an index to the
sessiontableThese changes will enhance the performance and integrity of the database schema. Once these adjustments are made, this module will be well-positioned for integration into the larger project ecosystem and for potential publication to npm registries.
To further align with the PR objectives:
- Ensure that this schema file is properly exported from the
@cuhacking/dbpackage.- Consider adding documentation comments to describe the purpose and usage of each table.
- If not already done, create a README.md file for the
@cuhacking/dbpackage explaining how to use these schemas in other applications.apps/portal/src/app/api/trpc/[trpc]/route.ts (1)
14-28: LGTM: Handler function is well-implemented with good error handling.The
handlerfunction is correctly set up usingfetchRequestHandlerfrom tRPC, with appropriate endpoint, router, and context creation. The error handling for the development environment is a good practice for debugging.Consider adding a more detailed error log in the development environment. For example:
if (envWebsiteServer.NODE_ENV === 'development') { console.error( - `❌ tRPC failed on ${path ?? '<no-path>'}: ${error.message}`, + `❌ tRPC failed on ${path ?? '<no-path>'}:`, + error ) }This will provide more comprehensive error information during development.
libs/api/project.json (1)
14-14: Consider adding relevant tags to the project.The tags array is currently empty. Consider adding relevant tags to help organize and categorize this project within your monorepo. For example, you might add tags like "api", "library", or any other relevant categorizations that make sense in your project structure.
libs/env/project.json (3)
6-13: LGTM: Release configuration is well-structured.The release configuration is appropriately set up, using Git tags for version resolution and specifying the correct package root. This approach ensures consistent versioning based on Git history.
Consider adding a
"preset": "conventional"to the release configuration to enforce conventional commit messages, which can help with automated versioning and changelog generation.
14-14: Consider adding relevant tags for better project organization.The
tagsarray is currently empty. Adding relevant tags can improve project organization and help with selecting projects for operations in an Nx workspace.Consider adding tags that describe the purpose or category of this library, such as:
"tags": ["env", "config", "utility"]
26-31: LGTM with suggestion: nx-release-publish target is configured, but could be improved.The nx-release-publish target is correctly set up with the appropriate package root and build dependencies. This ensures that the library is built before publishing.
Consider adding an explicit executor for the nx-release-publish target. For example:
"nx-release-publish": { "executor": "@nx/js:npm-publish", "options": { "packageRoot": "dist/{projectRoot}" }, "dependsOn": ["^build"] }This makes the publish process more explicit and allows for additional configuration options if needed in the future.
libs/auth/project.json (1)
15-25: LGTM: Build target configuration is well-structured.The build target configuration is correct for a TypeScript library in an Nx workspace. Good job including markdown files as assets for documentation.
Consider adding a
linttarget to ensure code quality:"lint": { "executor": "@nx/linter:eslint", "outputs": ["{options.outputFile}"], "options": { "lintFilePatterns": ["libs/auth/**/*.ts"] } }libs/utils/project.json (2)
6-13: LGTM: Release configuration is well-structured.The release configuration is correctly set up for versioning based on git tags. The package root is appropriately set to the distribution directory.
Consider adding a
"changelog"configuration to automatically generate changelogs during the release process. This can be beneficial for tracking changes across versions.
16-25: LGTM: Build target is correctly configured.The build target is well-configured for a TypeScript library, with appropriate settings for output path, main entry point, and TypeScript configuration. Including markdown files as assets is a good practice for documentation.
Consider adding a
"lint"target to ensure code quality. This can be achieved by adding:"lint": { "executor": "@nx/linter:eslint", "outputs": ["{options.outputFile}"], "options": { "lintFilePatterns": ["libs/utils/**/*.ts"] } }libs/db/project.json (2)
1-14: LGTM! Consider adding relevant tags.The project metadata and release configuration are well-defined for an Nx library project. The use of git-tag for version resolution is a good practice.
Consider adding relevant tags to the
tagsarray for better project organization and searchability within the Nx workspace. For example:- "tags": [], + "tags": ["db", "orm", "drizzle"],
32-83: LGTM! Comprehensive database operations are covered.The database-related targets are well-defined and cover a wide range of operations using drizzle-kit, which is consistent with the project's use of DrizzleORM.
Consider adding cache and outputs configuration to all applicable targets for consistency. For example:
"pull": { "executor": "nx:run-commands", "options": { "command": "drizzle-kit introspect --config {projectRoot}/drizzle.config.ts" - } + }, + "outputs": ["{workspaceRoot}/dist/libs/db"], + "cache": true },apps/portal/src/app/page.tsx (2)
1-3: LGTM! Consider adding type annotation for better readability.The import of
apiand the change to an async function align well with the PR objectives of creating a modularized tRPC API. This change enables the use of the new API within this component.Consider adding a return type annotation to the
Indexfunction for improved readability and type safety:- export default async function Index() { + export default async function Index(): Promise<JSX.Element> {
9-10: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The API call to
api.user.hello()is correctly implemented and its result is appropriately used in the component's render. This effectively demonstrates the integration of the new tRPC API.Consider adding error handling to manage potential API failures gracefully:
- const hello = await api.user.hello() + let hello; + try { + hello = await api.user.hello(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to fetch hello message:', error); + hello = { message: 'Hello, World!' }; // Fallback message + }Also applies to: 19-19
apps/portal/src/lib/trpc/react.tsx (1)
3-4: Consider importing 'process' from 'node:process' and re-enable the lint ruleInstead of disabling the
unicorn/prefer-node-protocolESLint rule, you can importprocessfrom'node:process'to comply with the rule and improve code clarity.Apply this diff to make the change:
-/* eslint-disable unicorn/prefer-node-protocol */ -import process from 'process' +import process from 'node:process'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (31)
- apps/portal/src/app/api/trpc/[trpc]/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/portal/src/app/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/portal/src/app/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/portal/src/lib/trpc/react.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/portal/src/lib/trpc/server.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/portal/src/lib/trpc/trpc.ts (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
- drizzle/0000_amusing_talisman.sql (1 hunks)
- drizzle/meta/0000_snapshot.json (1 hunks)
- drizzle/meta/_journal.json (1 hunks)
- drizzle/relations.ts (1 hunks)
- drizzle/schema.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/api/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/api/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/auth/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/db/drizzle.config.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/db/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/db/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/db/tsconfig.lib.json (1 hunks)
- libs/env/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/env/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/env/src/website/server.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/env/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/package.json (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/project.json (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/src/url.ts (1 hunks)
- libs/utils/tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
- tsconfig.base.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
package.json (1)
Learnt from: JowiAoun PR: cuhacking/2025#113 File: package.json:124-125 Timestamp: 2024-09-19T00:36:53.716Z Learning: In this project, the linting process for any apps and libraries should not be modified or adjusted.
🪛 Biome
apps/portal/src/lib/trpc/react.tsx
[error] 25-25: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (81)
libs/utils/src/index.ts (1)
1-3: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider using explicit exports for better control.
While using wildcard exports (
*) is convenient, it can sometimes lead to naming conflicts or unintended exports, especially in a library meant for wide use.Consider explicitly listing the exports from each module. This approach provides better control over what's being exposed and makes it easier for consumers to see what's available without diving into the implementation files.
Example:
export { utility1, utility2 } from './lib/utils'; export { urlFunction1, urlFunction2 } from './url';This change would require knowing the specific exports from each module. If you decide to keep the current wildcard exports, ensure that all exports from the sub-modules are intentional and well-documented.
To help with this decision, let's check the contents of the exported modules:
This will help us understand what's being exported and whether explicit exports would be beneficial.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Completed: Wildcard exports in
libs/utils/src/index.tsare appropriate since each exported module contains a single export, minimizing the risk of naming conflicts.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the contents of the exported modules echo "Contents of ./lib/utils:" cat libs/utils/src/lib/utils.ts echo "\nContents of ./url:" cat libs/utils/src/url.tsLength of output: 532
apps/portal/src/lib/trpc/trpc.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are correct and aligned with project structure.The imports are appropriate for setting up tRPC with React Query. The type import of
AppRouterfrom the@cuhacking/apipackage aligns with the PR objectives of creating modularized libraries, specifically the tRPC API for the server.
5-5: Excellent: tRPC setup ensures type-safe API calls.The creation and export of the
apiconstant usingcreateTRPCReact<AppRouter>()is well-implemented. This setup provides several benefits:
- It ensures type safety across the client-server boundary.
- It allows other parts of the application to easily use the tRPC client.
- It enables full-stack type safety, which can significantly reduce runtime errors and improve developer experience.
This implementation aligns well with the PR objectives of creating modularized libraries and setting up a tRPC API for the server.
libs/utils/package.json (2)
2-3: LGTM: Package name and type are well-defined.The package name "@cuhacking/utils" follows the scoped package naming convention, which is good for organization. Setting the type to "module" indicates that this package uses ECMAScript modules, which is a modern and recommended approach.
7-7: Verify the absence of dependencies.The
dependenciesobject is currently empty. This is unusual for a utility package. Please confirm if this is intentional or if dependencies are managed elsewhere (e.g., in a workspace configuration).If dependencies should be listed here, consider adding them. Otherwise, you may want to add a comment explaining why the dependencies are empty or managed elsewhere.
libs/db/package.json (2)
10-10: Typings declaration looks goodThe
typingsfield correctly points to the TypeScript declaration file, which is consistent with using TypeScript in the project.
7-9: Verify database-related dependenciesThe package is named "@cuhacking/db", suggesting it's a database library. However, there are no database-related dependencies listed.
Could you please confirm if any database-related dependencies (e.g., DrizzleORM as mentioned in the PR objectives) are missing from this package.json file? If they are intentionally omitted, consider adding a comment explaining why.
To help verify this, you can run the following script to check for database-related imports in the source files:
libs/api/package.json (3)
2-3: LGTM: Package name and type are well-configured.The package name "@cuhacking/api" follows the scoped package naming convention, which is good for organization. Setting the type to "module" indicates that this package uses ECMAScript modules, which is a modern and recommended approach.
10-10: LGTM: Typings configuration is correct.The typings field correctly points to the TypeScript declaration file, which is a good practice for TypeScript projects.
To verify the existence of the TypeScript declaration file, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Verify TypeScript declaration file if [ -f "libs/api/src/index.d.ts" ]; then echo "TypeScript declaration file exists." else echo "Warning: TypeScript declaration file not found." fi
6-9: Verify main entry point and consider updating tslib.The main entry point "./src/index.js" seems correct, but please ensure that this file exists and is the intended entry point for the package.
Additionally, consider updating the tslib dependency to the latest version for potential improvements and bug fixes.
To verify the main entry point and check for the latest tslib version, you can run:
libs/env/package.json (1)
7-9: Missing environment-related dependenciesThe PR objectives mention that this package is a wrapper around
t3-oss/nextjs-envand useszodfor type safety. However, these dependencies are not listed in the package.json file.Could you please verify if the following dependencies should be added:
t3-oss/nextjs-envzodIf they should be added, please update the dependencies section accordingly.
libs/auth/package.json (3)
10-10: Typings configuration looks goodThe typings field is correctly set to point to a TypeScript declaration file. This is good practice for providing type information to consumers of the package.
1-11: Summary of package.json reviewOverall, the package.json file is well-structured, but there are a few key points to address:
- Fix the "private" field to be a boolean value instead of a string.
- Consider using a TypeScript file as the main entry point, given that this appears to be a TypeScript project.
- Verify and add any missing authentication-related dependencies, such as Lucia.
Please review and address these points to improve the configuration of your auth package.
7-9: Verify authentication dependenciesThe package.json file only lists
tslibas a dependency. Given that this is an authentication library, it's surprising to not see any authentication-related dependencies listed.Are there any authentication-related dependencies that should be added to the package.json file? For example, you mentioned using Lucia for authentication in the PR objectives. If Lucia is being used, it should be listed as a dependency.
To verify the usage of authentication libraries, you can run the following script:
If any of these libraries are being used, please add them to the dependencies in package.json.
drizzle/meta/_journal.json (4)
2-2: Verify the version number.The version is set to "7". Please confirm that this is the correct version number for your Drizzle schema.
3-3: LGTM: Dialect correctly specified.The dialect is correctly set to "postgresql", which aligns with the use of DrizzleORM mentioned in the PR objectives.
4-12: LGTM: Entries array structure is correct.The entries array is correctly structured to allow for multiple schema change entries. Having a single entry is appropriate for an initial setup.
5-11: Verify the timestamp and clarify the "breakpoints" field.The entry object structure looks good overall, but there are two points to address:
The "when" timestamp (1727212944998) corresponds to Sat, 25 May 2024 16:29:04 GMT, which is in the future. Please verify if this is intentional or if it should be adjusted to the current date.
The purpose of the "breakpoints" field is not immediately clear. Could you provide more context on its usage and why it's set to true?
libs/db/drizzle.config.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are correct and align with project structure.The imports are appropriate for the Drizzle configuration. The use of
@cuhacking/envaligns well with the PR objective of creating modularized libraries.
1-12: Overall, the Drizzle configuration is well-implemented.The configuration aligns well with the PR objectives of creating modularized libraries. It correctly sets up the Drizzle ORM for use with PostgreSQL and integrates with the
@cuhacking/envpackage for secure handling of the database URL.The structure and content of this file contribute positively to the goal of establishing initial modularized libraries for use across various applications.
libs/db/tsconfig.lib.json (4)
2-2: LGTM: Proper extension of base tsconfig.jsonExtending the base
tsconfig.jsonis a good practice for maintaining consistent TypeScript configuration across the project.
3-7: LGTM: Appropriate compiler options for a libraryThe compiler options are well-configured for a library:
- Including Node.js types allows usage of Node.js APIs.
- Generating declaration files (
declaration: true) is crucial for TypeScript consumers.- The output directory is appropriately set to a centralized location.
9-9: LGTM: Appropriate exclude patternsThe exclude patterns are well-configured:
- Excluding
vite.config.tsis correct as it's not part of the library source.- Excluding test files (both
.spec.tsand.test.ts) is a standard practice to keep them separate from the main build.
8-8: Verify the necessity of including a JavaScript fileThe include patterns are mostly standard and appropriate:
- Including all TypeScript files in the
srcdirectory is correct.- Including
drizzle.config.tsis necessary for DrizzleORM configuration.However, the inclusion of
src/schema/index.jsis unusual in a TypeScript project.Could you please verify if this JavaScript file is necessary? If it contains essential code that can't be converted to TypeScript, consider adding a comment explaining its purpose and why it needs to remain as JavaScript.
✅ Verification successful
Remove unnecessary JavaScript file inclusion
The file
src/schema/index.jsdoes not exist and is not referenced in any TypeScript files. Therefore, you can remove it from the include patterns intsconfig.lib.json.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the content and usage of src/schema/index.js # Test 1: Check if the file exists and show its content echo "Content of src/schema/index.js:" cat libs/db/src/schema/index.js # Test 2: Check for references to this file in other TypeScript files echo "References to src/schema/index.js in TypeScript files:" rg --type typescript "src/schema/index.js" libs/dbLength of output: 371
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the existence and usage of src/schema/index.js # Test 1: Check if the file exists and show its content echo "Content of src/schema/index.js:" cat libs/db/src/schema/index.js # Test 2: Check for references to this file in TypeScript files with corrected file type echo "References to src/schema/index.js in TypeScript files:" rg --type ts "src/schema/index.js" libs/dbLength of output: 328
libs/utils/src/url.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM: Correct import statementThe import statement for the 'process' module is correct and follows best practices by using the 'node:' prefix for Node.js built-in modules.
1-13: Summary: Aligned with PR objectives, with suggestions for improvementThe
getBaseUrlfunction aligns well with the PR's objective of creating modularized libraries. It provides a utility that can be used across various applications to determine the base URL dynamically.Key points:
- The function correctly handles both browser and non-browser environments.
- It's part of the
@cuhacking/utilslibrary, which wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR objectives but fits the modular approach.- The suggested improvements (enhanced documentation, error handling, and HTTPS support) will make the function more robust and versatile.
These enhancements will contribute to creating a more maintainable and flexible codebase, which is in line with the overall goals of the PR.
drizzle/relations.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are correct and necessary.The imports are appropriate for defining the relations between session and user entities using the Drizzle ORM.
4-9: LGTM: sessionRelations is correctly defined.The
sessionRelationsconstant properly establishes a one-to-one relationship between the session and user entities. The foreign key relationship is correctly specified using thefieldsandreferencesproperties.
11-13: LGTM: userRelations is correctly defined.The
userRelationsconstant appropriately establishes a one-to-many relationship between the user and session entities. This correctly indicates that a user can have multiple sessions, which is consistent with thesessionRelationsdefinition.
1-13: Well-structured relations for the @cuhacking/db library.This file successfully defines the relationships between user and session entities, which aligns well with the PR objective of creating a modularized database library (
@cuhacking/db). The relations are consistent, concise, and follow Drizzle ORM conventions. This structure will facilitate efficient querying and management of user sessions in the application.docker-compose.yml (1)
15-17: Network configuration looks goodThe custom network 'hackathon-network' with the bridge driver is a good practice. It provides isolation for the containers and is suitable for most use cases.
apps/portal/src/lib/trpc/server.ts (4)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-structured.The imports are correctly set up for a server-side TRPC context in a Next.js application. The use of 'server-only' is a good practice to ensure this code only runs on the server.
8-15: LGTM: createContext function is well-implemented.The
createContextfunction is correctly implemented using React'scachefor optimization. It properly sets up the TRPC context with a custom header to identify RSC (React Server Component) calls. This approach ensures efficient and identifiable server-side TRPC operations.
17-17: LGTM: API export is correctly set up.The
apiexport is properly created usingcreateCallerwith thecreateContextfunction. This setup allows for efficient and type-safe TRPC procedure calls throughout the application.
1-17: Excellent implementation of server-side TRPC context.This file successfully sets up a server-side TRPC context for a Next.js application, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives of creating modularized libraries. The implementation makes good use of React Server Components features and follows best practices for TRPC setup. The code is concise, focused, and well-structured, providing a solid foundation for the API layer of the application.
apps/portal/src/app/layout.tsx (3)
16-20: Correct implementation of TRPCReactProvider.The
TRPCReactProvideris correctly wrapped around thechildrenprop inside the<body>tag. This ensures that all child components have access to the tRPC functionality, which is in line with the PR objective of implementing a tRPC API for the server.
1-1: LGTM! Verify the import path.The import of
TRPCReactProvideraligns with the PR objective of introducing a tRPC API. The relative import path seems correct, but it's worth double-checking to ensure it points to the right location.Let's verify the existence of the imported file:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the TRPCReactProvider import fd --type f --full-path "apps/portal/src/lib/trpc/react.(ts|tsx|js|jsx)"
Line range hint
1-23: Verify complete tRPC setup across the application.The changes to this layout file are minimal and correctly introduce the
TRPCReactProvider. However, to ensure a complete tRPC implementation:
- Verify that tRPC router and procedure definitions exist.
- Check for any necessary tRPC client configurations.
- Ensure that environment variables or other configurations required for tRPC are properly set up.
Let's check for the existence of key tRPC files:
libs/env/tsconfig.json (3)
2-2: LGTM: Proper extension from base configuration.Extending from a base TypeScript configuration is a good practice. It promotes consistency across the project and reduces duplication of common settings.
13-20: LGTM: Proper references to lib and spec configurations.The references to separate
tsconfig.lib.jsonandtsconfig.spec.jsonfiles are appropriate. This setup allows for different TypeScript settings to be applied to your library code and test code, which is a good practice for maintaining flexibility and separation of concerns.
21-22: LGTM: Appropriate use of empty files and include arrays.The empty
filesandincludearrays in this roottsconfig.jsonare appropriate when using project references. This setup allows for more granular control over file inclusion in the referenced configurations (tsconfig.lib.jsonandtsconfig.spec.json). It's a good practice that helps maintain a clear separation between different parts of your project.libs/utils/tsconfig.json (4)
2-2: LGTM: Proper extension from base configuration.Extending from a base TypeScript configuration is a good practice. It helps maintain consistency across the project and reduces duplication of common settings.
13-20: LGTM: Proper references to lib and spec configurations.The references to separate TypeScript configurations for library (
tsconfig.lib.json) and spec files (tsconfig.spec.json) is a good practice. This setup allows for different compiler settings for production code and test code, which can be beneficial for optimizing the build process and maintaining clear separation of concerns.
21-22: Verify the intention behind empty files and include arrays.The
filesandincludearrays are both empty. This is unusual as it means this configuration doesn't directly specify which files to include. Please verify if this is intentional. Typically, these arrays would include patterns to match the source files of your library.If this is intentional, it likely means that file inclusion is handled by the referenced configurations (
tsconfig.lib.jsonandtsconfig.spec.json) or by your build tool. In this case, consider adding a comment in the file to explain this setup for future maintainers.Let's check the referenced configuration files to see if they handle file inclusion:
✅ Verification successful
Empty
filesandincludearrays are intentional.The main
tsconfig.jsondoes not specify files to include directly, as file inclusion is handled bytsconfig.lib.jsonandtsconfig.spec.json. Consider adding a comment intsconfig.jsonto explain this setup for future maintainers.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check referenced TypeScript configurations for file inclusion echo "Checking tsconfig.lib.json:" cat libs/utils/tsconfig.lib.json | jq '.include, .files' echo "Checking tsconfig.spec.json:" cat libs/utils/tsconfig.spec.json | jq '.include, .files'Length of output: 524
3-12: Compiler options look good, with a note on noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature.The compiler options are well-configured for a modern TypeScript library:
- Using "ESNext" for the module and "Bundler" for moduleResolution is appropriate for a library to be published on npm.
- Strict type-checking options are enabled, which is excellent for maintaining code quality.
However, note that
noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignatureis set to false. While this might be necessary for certain coding patterns, it could potentially hide type errors. Ensure this setting is intentional and required for your use case.To verify if this setting is necessary, let's check for usage of index signatures in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Shell script updated to correctly search for index signatures and property accesses.
To accurately verify the necessity of
noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature, please run the following updated shell script:
Compiler options have been verified.
The
noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignaturesetting is appropriately configured:
Index signatures are present in the following files:
apps/docs/src/app/docs/layout.tsxapps/hackathon/src/server/db.tsapps/hackathon/src/app/layout.tsxapps/hackathon/src/app/docs/layout.tsxNo property access from variables of type
anywas detected, ensuring type safety is maintained.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of index signatures in the codebase # Search for index signatures echo "Searching for index signatures in TypeScript files:" rg --type typescript '\[.*: .*\]' # Search for property access from variables of type 'any' echo "Searching for property access from variables of type 'any':" rg --type typescript '(let|const|var) \w+: any.*\n.*\1\.\w+'Length of output: 616
Script:
# Description: Check for usage of index signatures in the codebase # Search for index signatures echo "Searching for index signatures in TypeScript files:" rg --type ts '\[.*: .*\]' # Search for property access from variables of type 'any' echo "Searching for property access from variables of type 'any':" rg --pcre2 --type ts '(let|const|var) \w+: any.*\n.*\1\.\w+'Length of output: 703
libs/env/src/website/server.ts (5)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are well-structured and appropriate.The imports are well-organized and include necessary dependencies for environment configuration and validation. The use of 'node:process' for importing the Node.js process module is a good practice for explicit imports.
8-9: LGTM: Good use of shared configurations.The
envWebsiteServeris created usingcreateEnv, extendingsharedEnvandenvWebsiteDb. This approach promotes code reuse and ensures consistency across different parts of the application.
10-18: LGTM: Well-defined environment variables with appropriate validation.The environment variables are well-structured:
- The shared
PORTvariable is correctly coerced to a number with a sensible default of 3000.- The required
AUTH_SECRETensures that a crucial security parameter is not overlooked.- Optional Google Auth variables provide flexibility for different deployment scenarios.
All variables use appropriate Zod schemas for validation, ensuring type safety.
19-21: Consider the implications of using experimental features and ensure proper validation.The use of
experimental__runtimeEnvsuggests this feature might not be stable. Be aware that directly accessingprocess.env.PORTin this section might bypass the Zod schema validation defined earlier.To ensure type safety, consider adding a runtime check:
experimental__runtimeEnv: { PORT: process.env.PORT ? Number(process.env.PORT) : undefined, },This approach maintains the benefits of the Zod schema while allowing for runtime flexibility.
22-24: LGTM: Sensible configuration options, but be cautious with validation skipping.The
emptyStringAsUndefined: trueoption is a good choice to prevent subtle bugs that could arise from empty string values.The
skipValidationoption can be useful in certain scenarios, such as during development or testing. However, be cautious when using this in production as it could lead to runtime errors if environment variables are misconfigured.To ensure this option is not misused, consider adding a warning log when validation is skipped:
If no warning is logged, consider adding one to alert developers when validation is skipped.
drizzle/0000_amusing_talisman.sql (1)
11-15: Thesessiontable structure looks good.The
sessiontable is well-structured for basic session management. The use oftimestamp with time zonefor theexpires_atcolumn is a good practice for handling different time zones.One minor suggestion: Consider adding an index on the
user_idcolumn to improve query performance when looking up sessions for a specific user.CREATE INDEX idx_session_user_id ON "session" ("user_id");This can be added after the table creation statement.
apps/portal/src/app/api/trpc/[trpc]/route.ts (4)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and align with project structure.The imports are well-organized and include necessary dependencies from Next.js, tRPC, and the custom packages mentioned in the PR objectives. This setup supports the goal of creating modularized libraries.
8-12: LGTM: Context creation function is well-implemented.The
createContextfunction is correctly implemented, using the request headers to create a tRPC context. The use of an async function allows for potential future asynchronous operations, adhering to best practices.
30-30: LGTM: Exports are correctly set up for Next.js API routes.The
handlerfunction is properly exported as both GET and POST methods, allowing it to handle both types of requests. This follows the correct pattern for Next.js API routes and tRPC endpoints.
1-30: Great implementation of tRPC handler for Next.js!This file successfully implements a tRPC handler for a Next.js application, aligning well with the PR objectives of creating modularized libraries. The code is well-structured, follows best practices for both tRPC and Next.js, and effectively utilizes the custom packages (
@cuhacking/apiand@cuhacking/env).Key points:
- Proper imports and setup
- Well-implemented context creation
- Correct handler configuration with error handling
- Appropriate exports for Next.js API routes
The implementation provides a solid foundation for the tRPC API in the modularized architecture.
libs/api/project.json (4)
1-5: LGTM: Project metadata is well-defined.The project metadata is correctly configured for an API library in an Nx monorepo structure. The name, schema reference, source root, and project type are all appropriately set.
16-25: LGTM: Build target is well-configured.The build target configuration is appropriate for a TypeScript library:
- It uses the correct executor for TypeScript compilation.
- The output path, main entry point, and TypeScript config file are all correctly specified.
- Including markdown files as assets is good for preserving documentation.
This setup should produce a properly built library package.
26-31: Verify the package root path in the nx-release-publish target.The nx-release-publish target configuration looks good:
- It correctly depends on the build target of all dependencies.
- The package root is specified, which is necessary for the publish process.
However, please ensure that the package root path "dist/{projectRoot}" is resolved correctly during the publish process, similar to the earlier release configuration.
To verify the package root path resolution, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the package root path resolution in the nx-release-publish target # Test: Check if the projectRoot is correctly resolved in the Nx command nx print-affected --target=nx-release-publish --select=api | grep packageRootThis will show how Nx resolves the packageRoot for the api project, helping to confirm if the path is correct.
6-13: Verify the package root path in the release configuration.The release configuration looks good overall. Using git tags for version resolution is a solid approach. However, please verify that the package root path "dist/{projectRoot}" is correct and that the "{projectRoot}" placeholder is resolved as expected in your build process.
To ensure the package root path is correct, run the following script:
libs/env/project.json (2)
1-5: LGTM: Project metadata is well-defined.The project metadata is correctly configured for an
envlibrary in an Nx workspace. The name, schema reference, source root, and project type are all appropriately set.
16-25: LGTM: Build target is correctly configured.The build target is well-configured for a TypeScript library:
- Uses the appropriate TypeScript compiler executor.
- Correctly specifies output path, main entry file, and TypeScript configuration.
- Includes markdown files as assets, which is good for documentation.
This configuration ensures that the library will be built correctly and include necessary files.
libs/auth/project.json (3)
1-5: LGTM: Basic project configuration is correct.The project name, schema reference, source root, and project type are all correctly set for an "auth" library in an Nx workspace.
6-13: Verify the package root path in the release configuration.The release configuration looks good overall, using git tags for versioning. However, there's a potential issue with the package root path:
"packageRoot": "dist/{projectRoot}"The
{projectRoot}placeholder might not resolve correctly in this context. Typically, for a library in thelibs/authdirectory, you'd want the package root to bedist/libs/auth.Please verify if this path resolves correctly during the build process. If it doesn't, consider changing it to:
"packageRoot": "dist/libs/auth"
26-31: Verify the package root path in the nx-release-publish target.The nx-release-publish target configuration looks good overall, with the correct dependency on the build target. However, there's a potential issue with the package root path:
"packageRoot": "dist/{projectRoot}"Similar to the release configuration, the
{projectRoot}placeholder might not resolve correctly in this context.Please verify if this path resolves correctly during the publish process. If it doesn't, consider changing it to:
"packageRoot": "dist/libs/auth"This ensures consistency with the build output path and avoids potential publishing errors.
libs/utils/project.json (3)
1-5: LGTM: Project metadata is well-defined.The project metadata is correctly configured for a library named "utils" in an Nx workspace. The source root and project type are appropriately set.
Also applies to: 14-14
26-31: LGTM: Publish target is properly configured.The publish target is correctly set up for an Nx workspace. It appropriately depends on the build target, ensuring the library is built before publishing. The package root is correctly set to the distribution directory.
1-33: Overall, the project configuration is well-structured and follows Nx best practices.The
project.jsonfile for the "utils" library is correctly configured with appropriate metadata, build, and publish targets. The release configuration is set up for versioning based on git tags. Minor suggestions were made to enhance the configuration, such as adding a changelog and a lint target.tsconfig.base.json (4)
5-5: LGTM: Improved readability oflibarrayThe consolidation of the
libarray into a single line improves readability without changing functionality. This is a good practice for shorter arrays in configuration files.
12-18: LGTM: Excellent addition of path mappings for modularized librariesThe addition of
pathsconfiguration is a great step towards modularization. These path mappings align perfectly with the PR objectives and will significantly improve the ease of importing these libraries across the project. This change enhances code maintainability and supports the modular architecture you're implementing.Benefits:
- Simplified imports (e.g.,
import { something } from '@cuhacking/api'instead of relative paths)- Easier refactoring and relocation of modules
- Improved IntelliSense and auto-import functionality in IDEs
Line range hint
1-31: Overall assessment: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications to
tsconfig.base.jsoneffectively support the creation of modularized libraries as described in the PR summary. The key changes include:
- Updating
moduleResolutionto "Bundler" for better compatibility with modern bundlers.- Adding
pathsconfiguration to facilitate easier imports of the new modularized libraries.These changes, along with minor formatting improvements, contribute to a more maintainable and modular codebase. The new configuration aligns perfectly with the goal of creating publishable, modularized libraries for use across various applications.
11-11: Verify compatibility with build setupThe change from
"Node"to"Bundler"formoduleResolutionis a good modernization step. This option is designed to work better with modern bundlers. However, ensure that this change is compatible with your current build setup and doesn't cause any unexpected issues with module resolution.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
drizzle/meta/0000_snapshot.json (2)
1-5: LGTM: General structure and metadata are well-defined.The schema is correctly set up for PostgreSQL, which is a suitable choice for a modern application. The version number and other metadata fields are properly defined.
85-95: LGTM: Empty sections are prepared for future use.The
enums,schemas,sequences,_meta, andinternalsections are currently empty. This is fine for the initial schema setup and provides clear placeholders for future expansions.libs/db/project.json (2)
15-31: LGTM! Build and publish targets are well-configured.The build and publish targets are correctly set up:
- The build target uses the appropriate executor for a TypeScript library.
- The publish target correctly depends on the build target.
- Including markdown files as assets is good for documentation.
1-85: Excellent configuration for the modularized database library.This
project.jsonfile is well-structured and comprehensive. It aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of creating a modularized database library using DrizzleORM. The configuration includes all necessary aspects:
- Proper project metadata and release configuration.
- Well-defined build and publish targets.
- A comprehensive set of database management targets using drizzle-kit.
This setup will facilitate easy development, testing, and deployment of the
@cuhacking/dblibrary.package.json (4)
22-45: LGTM: New dependencies align with PR objectivesThe added dependencies (
@lucia-auth/adapter-drizzle,@t3-oss/env-nextjs,@trpc/client,@trpc/react-query,@trpc/server,drizzle-orm,lucia,postgres,superjson,zod) align well with the PR objectives of creating modularized libraries for env, db, auth, and API. The minor version updates to existing dependencies are generally safe.
Line range hint
60-121: LGTM: DevDependencies updates align with project needsThe updates to existing devDependencies are minor version bumps, which are generally safe. The addition of
drizzle-kit(v^0.24.2) aligns with the use of DrizzleORM for the database library. The inclusion ofverdaccio(v^5.0.4) supports the PR objective of enabling local npm registry publishing.
126-127: Verify the need for lint-staged configurationBased on previous learnings, the linting process for apps and libraries should not be modified. Please verify if the addition of this lint-staged configuration is necessary and aligns with the project's linting guidelines.
128-130: Clarify the purpose of the new nx configurationAn
nxsection has been added with an emptyincludedScriptsarray. Could you please clarify the purpose of this addition and if it's intended for future use?apps/portal/src/app/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
11-431: Consider cleaning up unused boilerplate code.The majority of this component contains boilerplate code and examples that don't directly relate to the PR objectives of creating modularized libraries. While these can be useful as reference or starting points, they may clutter the codebase if not needed.
If these examples and boilerplate are not required for your project, consider removing them to keep the codebase clean and focused. You could move them to a separate example or documentation file if they're valuable for reference.
To check if this boilerplate code is used elsewhere in the project, you can run the following command:
If this command doesn't return any results outside of this file, it's safe to remove the unused sections.
apps/portal/src/lib/trpc/react.tsx (1)
37-68:TRPCReactProviderimplementation is well-structured and correctThe
TRPCReactProvidercomponent correctly initializes the tRPC client and React Query client, and provides them to the application. The use ofuseStateensures that the tRPC client is only created once on the client side.
| import type { AppRouter } from '@cuhacking/api' | ||
|
|
||
| import { createTRPCReact } from '@trpc/react-query' | ||
|
|
||
| export const api = createTRPCReact<AppRouter>() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding documentation and error handling.
The tRPC setup is correctly implemented and aligns well with the PR objectives. To further improve the code, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a brief comment explaining the purpose of this file and how it fits into the larger application architecture.
- Consider wrapping the
createTRPCReactcall in a try-catch block to handle any potential initialization errors. - If there are any specific configuration options or best practices for using this tRPC client in your application, consider adding them as comments or implementing them here.
These additions would enhance the maintainability and robustness of the code.
| "version": "0.0.1", | ||
| "private": "false", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the private property value.
The version is correctly set to "0.0.1", following semantic versioning. However, the private property should be a boolean, not a string.
Please update the private property as follows:
- "private": "false",
+ "private": false,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "version": "0.0.1", | |
| "private": "false", | |
| "version": "0.0.1", | |
| "private": false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MFarabi619 see releases being different for libraries (Nx release vs. semantic release)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| { | ||
| "name": "@cuhacking/db", | ||
| "type": "module", | ||
| "version": "0.0.1", | ||
| "private": "false", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the private field value
The private field should be a boolean value, not a string.
Change line 5 from:
"private": "false",to:
"private": false,This ensures that the package can be published as intended.
libs/db/package.json
Outdated
| "type": "module", | ||
| "version": "0.0.1", | ||
| "private": "false", | ||
| "main": "./src/index.js", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a TypeScript file as the main entry point
Since this appears to be a TypeScript project (given the tslib dependency), it might be more appropriate to use a .ts file as the main entry point.
Consider changing line 6 from:
"main": "./src/index.js",to:
"main": "./src/index.ts",This ensures that TypeScript files are properly recognized and processed.
| "version": "0.0.1", | ||
| "private": "false", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the private field value type.
The private field should be a boolean, not a string.
Please update the private field as follows:
- "private": "false",
+ "private": false,This change ensures that the private field is correctly interpreted as a boolean value.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "version": "0.0.1", | |
| "private": "false", | |
| "version": "0.0.1", | |
| "private": false, |
| CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS "user" ( | ||
| "id" text PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, | ||
| "name" text, | ||
| "email" text NOT NULL, | ||
| "avatar_url" text | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refining the user table structure.
The current user table structure is a good start, but there are some potential improvements:
- The
namecolumn allows NULL values, which might lead to issues in user display or sorting. - Consider using more specific data types for better data integrity and performance:
id: If it's a UUID, consider using theuuidtype instead oftext.email: Consider adding a unique constraint to prevent duplicate email addresses.
Here's a suggested refinement of the user table:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS "user" (
"id" uuid PRIMARY KEY DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(),
"name" text NOT NULL,
"email" text NOT NULL UNIQUE,
"avatar_url" text
);This structure ensures that every user has a name, prevents duplicate email addresses, and uses a more specific type for the id column.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@JowiAoun instruct CodeRabbit to ignore this dir
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@JowiAoun, to have CodeRabbit ignore this directory in future reviews, you can update your CodeRabbit configuration to exclude it using the path_filters setting. Here's how you can do it:
Add the following to your CodeRabbit configuration file (e.g., .code_rabbit.yaml or .code_rabbit.json):
path_filters:
exclude:
- 'drizzle/**'This configuration will instruct CodeRabbit to ignore all files within the drizzle directory during automated reviews.
For more details, you can refer to the CodeRabbit documentation on path-based instructions.
Let me know if you have any questions!
| DO $$ BEGIN | ||
| ALTER TABLE "session" ADD CONSTRAINT "session_user_id_user_id_fk" FOREIGN KEY ("user_id") REFERENCES "public"."user"("id") ON DELETE no action ON UPDATE no action; | ||
| EXCEPTION | ||
| WHEN duplicate_object THEN null; | ||
| END $$; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider revising the foreign key constraint behavior.
The current foreign key constraint uses "NO ACTION" for both ON DELETE and ON UPDATE. This might not be the most appropriate behavior for the relationship between users and sessions.
Consider changing the foreign key constraint to use "CASCADE" on delete:
ALTER TABLE "session" ADD CONSTRAINT "session_user_id_user_id_fk"
FOREIGN KEY ("user_id") REFERENCES "public"."user"("id")
ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE NO ACTION;This ensures that when a user is deleted, all associated sessions are automatically removed, maintaining data consistency and preventing orphaned sessions.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling for constraint creation.
The current approach silently ignores the "duplicate_object" exception. While this allows for re-running the migration, it might hide other potential issues.
Consider a more robust error handling approach:
DO $$
BEGIN
ALTER TABLE "session" ADD CONSTRAINT "session_user_id_user_id_fk"
FOREIGN KEY ("user_id") REFERENCES "public"."user"("id")
ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE NO ACTION;
EXCEPTION
WHEN duplicate_object THEN
RAISE NOTICE 'Foreign key constraint "session_user_id_user_id_fk" already exists, skipping.';
WHEN OTHERS THEN
RAISE EXCEPTION 'An error occurred while adding the foreign key constraint: %', SQLERRM;
END $$;This approach:
- Provides feedback when the constraint already exists.
- Catches and reports other unexpected errors, allowing for better debugging and migration management.
| "public.user": { | ||
| "name": "user", | ||
| "schema": "", | ||
| "columns": { | ||
| "id": { | ||
| "name": "id", | ||
| "type": "text", | ||
| "primaryKey": true, | ||
| "notNull": true | ||
| }, | ||
| "name": { | ||
| "name": "name", | ||
| "type": "text", | ||
| "primaryKey": false, | ||
| "notNull": false | ||
| }, | ||
| "email": { | ||
| "name": "email", | ||
| "type": "text", | ||
| "primaryKey": false, | ||
| "notNull": true | ||
| }, | ||
| "avatar_url": { | ||
| "name": "avatar_url", | ||
| "type": "text", | ||
| "primaryKey": false, | ||
| "notNull": false | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "indexes": {}, | ||
| "foreignKeys": {}, | ||
| "compositePrimaryKeys": {}, | ||
| "uniqueConstraints": {} | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the user table structure.
While the basic structure is good, consider the following improvements:
- Add a unique constraint to the
emailfield to prevent duplicate emails. - Create an index on the
emailfield for faster lookups. - Consider making the
namefield non-nullable to ensure all users have a name.
Here's a suggested modification to the user table definition:
"public.user": {
// ... existing code ...
"indexes": {
"email_idx": {
"name": "email_idx",
"columns": ["email"]
}
},
"uniqueConstraints": {
"email_unique": {
"name": "email_unique",
"columns": ["email"]
}
}
}Also, consider changing the notNull property of the name field to true.
| "public.session": { | ||
| "name": "session", | ||
| "schema": "", | ||
| "columns": { | ||
| "id": { | ||
| "name": "id", | ||
| "type": "text", | ||
| "primaryKey": true, | ||
| "notNull": true | ||
| }, | ||
| "user_id": { | ||
| "name": "user_id", | ||
| "type": "text", | ||
| "primaryKey": false, | ||
| "notNull": true | ||
| }, | ||
| "expires_at": { | ||
| "name": "expires_at", | ||
| "type": "timestamp with time zone", | ||
| "primaryKey": false, | ||
| "notNull": true | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "indexes": {}, | ||
| "foreignKeys": { | ||
| "session_user_id_user_id_fk": { | ||
| "name": "session_user_id_user_id_fk", | ||
| "tableFrom": "session", | ||
| "tableTo": "user", | ||
| "schemaTo": "public", | ||
| "columnsFrom": [ | ||
| "user_id" | ||
| ], | ||
| "columnsTo": [ | ||
| "id" | ||
| ], | ||
| "onDelete": "no action", | ||
| "onUpdate": "no action" | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| "compositePrimaryKeys": {}, | ||
| "uniqueConstraints": {} | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the session table structure and foreign key behavior.
The basic structure is good, but consider the following improvements:
- Modify the foreign key behavior to cascade on delete. This ensures that when a user is deleted, their sessions are automatically removed.
- Add an index on
user_idfor faster session lookups by user. - Add an index on
expires_atto optimize queries for cleaning up expired sessions.
Here's a suggested modification to the session table definition:
"public.session": {
// ... existing code ...
"indexes": {
"user_id_idx": {
"name": "user_id_idx",
"columns": ["user_id"]
},
"expires_at_idx": {
"name": "expires_at_idx",
"columns": ["expires_at"]
}
},
"foreignKeys": {
"session_user_id_user_id_fk": {
// ... existing code ...
"onDelete": "cascade",
"onUpdate": "no action"
}
}
}| if (typeof window === 'undefined') { | ||
| return createQueryClient() | ||
| } | ||
| return (clientQueryClientSingleton ??= createQueryClient()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid assignment within expressions to improve code clarity
The assignment within the return statement can be confusing and may reduce code readability. Consider separating the assignment from the return statement.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
function getQueryClient() {
if (typeof window === 'undefined') {
return createQueryClient()
}
- return (clientQueryClientSingleton ??= createQueryClient())
+ if (clientQueryClientSingleton == null) {
+ clientQueryClientSingleton = createQueryClient()
+ }
+ return clientQueryClientSingleton
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return (clientQueryClientSingleton ??= createQueryClient()) | |
| function getQueryClient() { | |
| if (typeof window === 'undefined') { | |
| return createQueryClient() | |
| } | |
| if (clientQueryClientSingleton == null) { | |
| clientQueryClientSingleton = createQueryClient() | |
| } | |
| return clientQueryClientSingleton | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 25-25: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
JowiAoun
force-pushed
the
jowi/feat/94-adr-create-modularized-libraries
branch
from
e3e54e8
to
02b8980
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- libs/env/src/website/db.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/env/src/website/db.ts (3)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and shared environment extension.The imports are appropriate for the file's purpose, and extending a shared environment configuration promotes code reuse and consistency across the project.
7-8: LGTM: Environment configuration setup.The use of
createEnvfrom@t3-oss/env-nextjsis appropriate for creating type-safe environment variables. ExtendingsharedEnvaligns with the modular approach mentioned in the PR objectives.
12-17: LGTM: Runtime configuration and options, with a note on validation skipping.The experimental runtime environment correctly retrieves the DATABASE_URL from process.env. The option to treat empty strings as undefined is a good practice.
However, be cautious with the
skipValidationoption. While it can be useful in certain scenarios (e.g., testing), it might lead to runtime errors if misused in production environments.To ensure this option is used safely, let's check for any usage of SKIP_ENV_VALIDATION:
Please review the results to confirm that SKIP_ENV_VALIDATION is only set in appropriate contexts, such as testing environments.
✅ Verification successful
:
SKIP_ENV_VALIDATION is used appropriately across the codebase. All instances are confined to configuration and development-related files, ensuring that environment validation is only skipped in suitable contexts such as development and testing environments.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of SKIP_ENV_VALIDATION across the codebase rg "SKIP_ENV_VALIDATION" --type-add 'config:*.{json,js,ts}' -t configLength of output: 434
| server: { | ||
| DATABASE_URL: z.string().url().startsWith('postgres'), | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the DATABASE_URL validation.
The current validation ensures that the DATABASE_URL is a string, a valid URL, and starts with 'postgres'. However, it might be beneficial to add a minimum length check to prevent potentially invalid URLs like 'postgres' from being accepted.
Consider modifying the validation as follows:
- DATABASE_URL: z.string().url().startsWith('postgres'),
+ DATABASE_URL: z.string().url().startsWith('postgres').min(10),This change ensures that the URL is at least 10 characters long, which is a reasonable minimum for a valid PostgreSQL connection string.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| server: { | |
| DATABASE_URL: z.string().url().startsWith('postgres'), | |
| }, | |
| server: { | |
| DATABASE_URL: z.string().url().startsWith('postgres').min(10), | |
| }, |
JowiAoun
force-pushed
the
jowi/feat/94-adr-create-modularized-libraries
branch
from
efe7cc3
to
2e5d82e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (37)
apps/docs/src/app/docs/source.ts (1)
40-45: LGTM: New "Libraries" page added correctlyThe new "Libraries" page entry has been successfully added to the
pagesarray, containing all required fields and aligning with the PR objectives. The placement at the end of the array maintains the existing order of pages.Consider adding a trailing comma after the
icon: LibrariesIconline for consistency with the other entries and to make future additions easier:{ title: 'Libraries', description: 'Libraries within this monorepo used within the applications.', url: 'libraries', - icon: LibrariesIcon, + icon: LibrariesIcon, },apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/template.mdx (7)
1-21: LGTM! Consider adding a version number to the frontmatter.The frontmatter and Overview section provide a solid structure for library documentation. The placeholder text effectively guides document authors on what information to include.
Consider adding a
versionfield to the frontmatter to help track documentation versions alongside library releases:--- title: template description: Template documentation page for creating new libraries. +version: 1.0.0 ---
22-40: LGTM! Consider adding code block examples for API usage.The API Reference section provides a good structure for documenting functions, objects, and error handling.
To make the template more comprehensive, consider adding placeholder code blocks for usage examples:
### `myAction` Function - **Description**: - **Parameters**: - **Return Type**: + +```typescript +// Example usage of myAction +const result = myAction(param1, param2); +``` ### `myThing` Object - **Properties** - `FirstProperty`: + +```typescript +// Example usage of myThing +const thing = new myThing(); +console.log(thing.FirstProperty); +```
41-57: LGTM! Consider adding a command for running the library locally.The Commands section provides useful commands for developers working with the library in an Nx monorepo context.
Consider adding a command for running the library locally, which could be helpful for testing:
pnpm nx graph --focus <lib>
+### Run library locally
+
+To run the library locally for testing:
+sh title="Terminal" +pnpm nx run <lib>:serve +--- `58-79`: **LGTM! Consider adding a contribution workflow guide.** The Contributing section provides good guidelines for code formatting and testing, including relevant commands. Consider adding a brief guide on the contribution workflow, such as creating issues, branching, and submitting pull requests: ```diff pnpm nx run <lib>:test
+### Contribution Workflow
+
+1. Create an issue describing the change you wish to make.
+2. Fork the repository and create a feature branch.
+3. Make your changes, ensuring they adhere to the coding standards.
+4. Submit a pull request, referencing the original issue.--- `80-92`: **LGTM! Consider using a list format for better organization.** The FAQs section is a valuable addition to the documentation template. Consider using a list format for better organization and readability: ```diff ## ❓ FAQs -### What happens if ...? +1. **What happens if ...?** + + Provide an answer along with an example error message. -Provide an answer along with an example error message. +2. **Can I add ...?** -### Can I add ...? - -Show an example of adding more to the library. + Show an example of adding more to the library.
93-101: LGTM! Consider adding guidance on reporting issues.The Troubleshooting section provides a good structure for documenting common errors and their solutions.
Consider adding guidance on how users can report issues they encounter:
#### Invalidity Describe a common invalidity issue and how to fix it, along with an example error output. + +### Reporting Issues + +If you encounter an issue not covered here, please report it on our GitHub Issues page: +[Link to GitHub Issues]
1-101: Excellent documentation template! Consider adding a "Changelog" section.The template provides a comprehensive structure for library documentation, covering all essential aspects from overview to troubleshooting. The use of emojis in section titles adds visual appeal and aids in quick navigation.
Consider adding a "Changelog" section to help users track updates and changes to the library:
--- ## 📅 Changelog ### [Unreleased] ### [1.0.0] - YYYY-MM-DD - Initial release [Unreleased]: https://github.com/username/repo/compare/v1.0.0...HEAD [1.0.0]: https://github.com/username/repo/releases/tag/v1.0.0This addition would help users stay informed about the library's evolution over time.
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/utils.mdx (3)
37-47: Enhance the API Reference section with more details.While the current API reference provides basic information, it could be improved by:
- Specifying any parameters the
getBaseUrlfunction accepts (even if it's none).- Providing more details about the return value, such as its format or possible values.
- Clarifying the error handling approach. What types of errors are handled, and how?
- Including any exceptions that might be thrown, if applicable.
Example enhancement:
### `getBaseUrl` - **Description**: Gets the base URL of the current window. - **Parameters**: None - **Return Type**: `string` - **Return Value**: The base URL of the current window (e.g., "https://localhost:3000/") - **Error Handling**: - If `window` is undefined (server-side rendering), returns an empty string. - If `window.location` is undefined, throws a `TypeError`.This level of detail would provide developers with a more comprehensive understanding of the function's behavior.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~46-~46: Generally speaking, “themself” is only acceptable when referring to a singular entity (such as the singular usage of “they”, which is the preferred pronoun for many non-binary people). If “themself” refers to a plural entity (such as “everybody”, or the standard usage of “they”), you should use “themselves”.
Context: ... should be handled within the functions themself. The library does not perform any addit...(THEMSELF)
69-87: Enhance the Contributing section with more detailed guidelines.While the current Contributing section provides basic information about code formatting and testing, it could be improved by:
- Adding a step-by-step guide for contributing new functions or constants.
- Specifying the coding style guidelines (e.g., naming conventions, documentation requirements).
- Explaining the process for submitting pull requests.
- Mentioning any required checks or approvals before merging contributions.
Example addition:
### Contribution Process 1. Fork the repository and create your branch from `main`. 2. Write clear, commented code following our coding style guidelines. 3. Ensure your code is fully tested and all tests pass. 4. Update the documentation, including the API Reference if necessary. 5. Submit a pull request with a clear title and description. All contributions must pass linting, tests, and code review before being merged.These additions would provide a more comprehensive guide for potential contributors.
91-97: Expand the FAQs section with more relevant questions and detailed answers.While the current FAQ provides basic guidance on adding new functions/constants, consider expanding this section to address more potential questions and provide more detailed answers. Some suggestions:
- Elaborate on the existing answer, providing a step-by-step guide for adding new functions/constants.
- Add more FAQs that address common issues or questions developers might have when using or contributing to the library. For example:
- "How do I use the utils library in my application?"
- "What's the process for deprecating a function in the utils library?"
- "How can I propose a new utility function for inclusion in the library?"
- "What's the versioning strategy for the utils library?"
Example expanded answer for the existing FAQ:
### How can I add a new function/constant? 1. Identify an appropriate existing file or create a new one in the `src` directory. 2. Write your function/constant, ensuring it's well-documented with JSDoc comments. 3. Export the function/constant in the file. 4. Update the `index.ts` file to re-export your new addition if necessary. 5. Write unit tests for your new function/constant in the `__tests__` directory. 6. Update the API Reference in this documentation file. 7. Submit a pull request with your changes. Remember to follow the coding style guidelines and ensure your addition has a global context suitable for this library.Expanding this section will provide more comprehensive guidance to contributors and users of the library.
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/auth.mdx (6)
6-38: LGTM! Consider adding a link to the TRPC documentation.The overview section provides a clear and concise introduction to the authentication library. The key features are well-presented, and the basic usage example effectively demonstrates how to create a TRPC context using the
authfunction.To enhance the documentation, consider adding a link to the TRPC documentation when mentioning TRPC context, as this might be helpful for developers who are not familiar with TRPC.
42-54: Enhance the API Reference section with more details.While the API Reference section provides basic information about the
authfunction, it could be improved by:
- Adding more details about the
UserandSessiontypes, including their properties.- Expanding on the error handling section, possibly including examples of how to handle authentication failures.
- Providing information on any configuration options or parameters that the
authfunction might accept.Consider restructuring this section to provide more comprehensive documentation of the API.
75-91: LGTM! Consider adding a link to the project's contribution guidelines.The Contributing section provides clear instructions for code formatting and testing, which is excellent. The commands for linting and running tests are well-documented.
To further improve this section, consider adding a link to the project's full contribution guidelines if they exist. This could provide contributors with more detailed information on the development process, pull request procedures, and coding standards.
95-104: LGTM! Consider expanding the FAQs and adding a comma.The FAQs section addresses common questions about authentication and adding providers. It's a good start, but there's room for improvement:
- Consider adding more FAQs to cover a wider range of potential user questions.
- The answer about adding providers could be expanded to provide more context on why team discussion is necessary and what kind of auth secrets are required.
Add a comma after "with the team" in line 103 to improve readability:
-This will need to be discussed with the team as it requires every team member to make an auth secret +This will need to be discussed with the team, as it requires every team member to make an auth secret🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~103-~103: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...This will need to be discussed with the team as it requires every team member to mak...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
108-115: Enhance the Troubleshooting section with more detailed information.While the Troubleshooting section addresses a common authentication issue, it could be improved by:
- Adding more common errors or issues that users might encounter.
- Providing more specific steps for troubleshooting authentication problems, such as:
- Checking specific environment variables
- Verifying callback URL configurations
- Steps to debug authentication flow
- Including links to relevant documentation or resources for more in-depth troubleshooting.
Consider expanding this section to provide more comprehensive troubleshooting guidance for users.
1-115: Overall good documentation with room for improvement.The documentation for the authentication library provides a solid foundation, covering key aspects such as overview, API reference, commands, contributing guidelines, FAQs, and troubleshooting. However, there are several areas where it could be enhanced:
- Expand the API Reference section with more detailed information about types and error handling.
- Add more FAQs to cover a wider range of potential user questions.
- Enhance the Troubleshooting section with more specific steps and common issues.
- Consider adding links to related documentation (e.g., TRPC, full contribution guidelines) where appropriate.
- Ensure consistency in formatting and punctuation throughout the document.
These improvements would make the documentation more comprehensive and user-friendly, ultimately enhancing the developer experience when working with the authentication library.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~103-~103: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...This will need to be discussed with the team as it requires every team member to mak...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/api.mdx (2)
6-45: LGTM! Consider adding a note about type safety.The overview section provides a clear and concise introduction to the API library. The basic usage example effectively demonstrates how to define and call a procedure.
Consider adding a brief note about how the type safety feature works in practice, as it's mentioned as a key feature but not demonstrated in the example.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~36-~36: In American English, abbreviations like “etc.” require a period.
Context: ... request (containing the user, session, etc). This ispublicProcedure, meaning au...(ETC_PERIOD)
36-36: Add a period after "etc" for grammatical correctness.In American English, abbreviations like "etc." require a period.
Change:
-request (containing the user, session, etc) +request (containing the user, session, etc.)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~36-~36: In American English, abbreviations like “etc.” require a period.
Context: ... request (containing the user, session, etc). This ispublicProcedure, meaning au...(ETC_PERIOD)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/db.mdx (4)
1-29: LGTM! Consider enhancing the basic usage example.The overview section provides a clear and concise introduction to the db library. However, the basic usage example could be more detailed to help users get started quickly.
Consider expanding the basic usage example with a code snippet demonstrating how to import and use the
dbobject for a simple query or mutation.Also, there's a minor grammatical issue:
-This container can be taken down afterwards with `docker-compose down`. +This container can be taken down afterward with `docker-compose down`.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[locale-violation] ~28-~28: In American English, ‘afterward’ is the preferred variant. ‘Afterwards’ is more commonly used in British English and other dialects.
Context: ...up -dThis container can be taken down afterwards withdocker-compose down`. --- ## 📖...(AFTERWARDS_US)
45-75: LGTM! Fix the link formatting in line 71.The Commands section is well-structured and provides clear examples for users. However, there's a minor formatting issue with the link in line 71.
Please update the link formatting as follows:
-All other `drizzle-kit` [https://orm.drizzle.team/kit-docs/commands](commands) are supported, such as `generate` and `migrate`. +All other `drizzle-kit` [commands](https://orm.drizzle.team/kit-docs/commands) are supported, such as `generate` and `migrate`.
77-102: LGTM! Consider expanding contributing guidelines.The Contributing section provides useful information about code formatting, testing, and working with migrations. The linting and testing commands are clearly presented.
To make the contributing guidelines more comprehensive, consider adding:
- A code style guide or reference to a style guide.
- Guidelines for commit messages and pull requests.
- Information about the project's branching strategy.
- Instructions for setting up the development environment.
These additions would help new contributors get started more easily and ensure consistency across contributions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~88-~88: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...ations may require to truncate (delete) all of the data in the database. One cause of this...(ALL_OF_THE)
104-113: Expand the FAQs section with more common questions.While the current FAQ about handling data truncation is relevant, having only one question in this section seems limited. Consider expanding this section to cover more common questions that users might have when working with the db library.
Some suggestions for additional FAQs:
- How to handle schema changes in a production environment?
- Best practices for writing and managing migrations?
- How to optimize database queries using this library?
- How to handle database connections in a serverless environment?
Adding more FAQs would make this section more valuable for users of the library.
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/env.mdx (7)
6-39: LGTM! Consider adding a note about Verdaccio.The overview section provides a clear and accurate description of the
@cuhacking/envlibrary, aligning well with the PR objectives. The basic usage example effectively demonstrates the library's key features and type-safety capabilities.Consider adding a brief note about the ability to publish this library locally using Verdaccio, as mentioned in the PR objectives. This information could be valuable for developers working with the library.
58-80: Enhance the API Reference section.While the API Reference section provides basic information about the exported entities, it could be improved to offer more value to developers:
For each property in
envWebsiteDbandenvWebsiteServer, consider adding:
- A brief description of its purpose
- Any constraints or validation rules applied (e.g., URL format, required length)
- An example value (with sensitive information redacted)
Expand on the shared variables concept:
- Explain why and when variables should be placed in
shared.ts- Provide an example of how to use a shared variable
Enhance the Error Handling subsection:
- Include examples of common type mismatches
- Explain how to resolve these issues
These additions would make the documentation more comprehensive and user-friendly.
Would you like me to draft an expanded version of this section with these improvements?
82-96: LGTM! Consider adding a command for running the library.The Commands section provides useful information for developers, particularly for viewing project commands and dependencies. This aligns well with the modular approach mentioned in the PR objectives.
Consider adding a command that demonstrates how to run or use the library directly. This could be particularly useful for developers who want to test the library in isolation or as part of their development workflow.
100-121: Enhance the Contributing section.The Contributing section provides essential information, but it could be more comprehensive:
Expand on the code formatting guidelines:
- Specify the naming conventions for environment variable files
- Explain the expected structure within these files
Add a subsection on pull request guidelines:
- Describe the expected process for submitting changes
- Mention any required documentation updates
Enhance the testing subsection:
- Explain what types of tests are expected (e.g., unit tests, integration tests)
- Provide guidelines for writing effective tests for environment variables
Include information on the review process:
- Describe what contributors can expect after submitting a pull request
- Mention any automatic checks or CI/CD processes in place
These additions would provide a more comprehensive guide for potential contributors, ensuring consistency and quality in contributions.
Would you like me to draft an expanded version of this section with these improvements?
125-138: LGTM! Consider adding more FAQs.The FAQs section effectively addresses common questions and emphasizes the benefits of using the library, aligning well with the PR objectives.
Consider adding more frequently asked questions to provide a more comprehensive resource for developers. Some suggestions:
- How to handle different environments (development, staging, production)?
- Can I use this library with other frameworks besides Next.js?
- How does this library handle sensitive information in environment variables?
- What's the performance impact of using this library compared to direct
process.envaccess?🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[locale-violation] ~131-~131: In American English, ‘afterward’ is the preferred variant. ‘Afterwards’ is more commonly used in British English and other dialects.
Context: ...d then providing it in the.envfile. Afterwards, don't forget to include an example (no...(AFTERWARDS_US)
141-152: Expand the Troubleshooting section.While the current Troubleshooting section provides a good example of a common error, it could be more comprehensive:
Add more common error scenarios, such as:
- Type mismatch errors
- Errors related to missing
.envfiles- Issues with environment-specific variables (e.g., development vs. production)
For each error scenario, provide:
- A clear description of the error
- Possible causes
- Step-by-step troubleshooting instructions
- Solutions or workarounds
Include a subsection on debugging techniques specific to this library, such as:
- How to use logging or debugging tools effectively
- Tips for isolating environment variable issues
Consider adding a "Common Pitfalls" subsection to help developers avoid frequent mistakes.
These additions would make the Troubleshooting section a more valuable resource for developers using the library.
Would you like me to draft an expanded version of this section with these improvements?
131-131: Minor language correction for consistency.For consistency with American English usage throughout the document, consider changing "Afterwards" to "Afterward" in this line.
-and then providing it in the `.env` file. Afterwards, don't forget to include an example (not your own key) +and then providing it in the `.env` file. Afterward, don't forget to include an example (not your own key)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[locale-violation] ~131-~131: In American English, ‘afterward’ is the preferred variant. ‘Afterwards’ is more commonly used in British English and other dialects.
Context: ...d then providing it in the.envfile. Afterwards, don't forget to include an example (no...(AFTERWARDS_US)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/contribution-guidelines/index.mdx (7)
Line range hint
1-45: LGTM! Comprehensive preface with valuable context.The added preface provides excellent context for contributors, emphasizing the variability of best practices and the project's goals. The use of accordion components helps organize the information effectively.
Consider adding a brief introduction to the modular library approach mentioned in the PR objectives to set the stage for the contribution guidelines that follow.
170-176: Good addition of important warnings.The warnings for Windows users and about the monorepo migration are valuable additions that help set correct expectations for contributors.
To improve clarity, consider adding a brief explanation of what a monorepo is and how it affects the contribution process. This will help newcomers understand the context better.
Line range hint
177-251: Good inclusion of legacy steps for transition period.The addition of the "Legacy steps" accordion is a thoughtful way to maintain backwards compatibility while signaling the upcoming changes. This aligns well with the ongoing monorepo migration mentioned in the PR objectives.
To improve clarity and help contributors understand the transition:
- Consider adding an estimated timeline for when these legacy steps will be removed.
- Briefly explain why these steps are becoming legacy (e.g., "due to the shift to a modular library structure").
252-259: Good addition of Drizzle Migrate step.The inclusion of the Drizzle Migrate step aligns well with the PR objective of creating a modularized database library (@cuhacking/db) built with DrizzleORM.
To provide more context for contributors:
- Consider adding a brief explanation of why the project has switched from Prisma to Drizzle.
- Include a link to the Drizzle documentation for those unfamiliar with the tool.
Line range hint
260-331: Good update of project run commands.The updated commands for running different projects (Website, Hacker Portal, DevDocs) correctly reflect the shift to using pnpm as the package manager. This change aligns well with the modular approach mentioned in the PR objectives.
For consistency and clarity:
- Consider adding brief descriptions for each project (Website, Hacker Portal, DevDocs) to help contributors understand their purposes.
- Ensure that the formatting and structure of the command blocks are consistent across all projects. For example, the Hacker Portal section has some inconsistent indentation.
Line range hint
332-387: Excellent addition of Nx commands explanation.The new accordion explaining Nx commands syntax is a valuable addition to the contribution guidelines. It provides clear examples and includes important information about CI setup and remote caching, which are crucial for efficient monorepo management.
To further improve this section:
- Consider adding a brief explanation of why Nx is being used and its benefits in the context of this project's modular structure.
- The line "automatically enabled Fast Refresh for 1 custom loader" in the example output seems out of place. Consider removing it or explaining its relevance.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~338-~338: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...t-syntax.svg" /> To execute tasks with Nx use the following syntax: ```sh title=...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[typographical] ~349-~349: Two consecutive dots
Context: ...nx run-many -t ``` ..or add-pto filter specific projects ...(DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION)
Line range hint
414-416: Consider balancing humor with professionalism.While a touch of humor can make documentation more engaging, it's important to ensure it doesn't detract from the professional nature of the contribution guidelines.
Consider replacing the "Profit" link with a more relevant and helpful resource for contributors. For example, you could link to a "What's Next?" section that guides contributors on where to find tasks to work on or how to submit their first pull request.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- apps/docs/src/app/docs/source.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/contribution-guidelines/index.mdx (6 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/knowledge-base/meta.json (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/api.mdx (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/auth.mdx (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/db.mdx (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/env.mdx (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/index.mdx (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/meta.json (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/template.mdx (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/utils.mdx (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/meta.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
apps/docs/src/content/docs/contribution-guidelines/index.mdx
[typographical] ~349-~349: Two consecutive dots
Context: ...nx run-many -t ``` ..or add-pto filter specific projects ...(DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/api.mdx
[style] ~36-~36: In American English, abbreviations like “etc.” require a period.
Context: ... request (containing the user, session, etc). This ispublicProcedure, meaning au...(ETC_PERIOD)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/auth.mdx
[uncategorized] ~103-~103: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...This will need to be discussed with the team as it requires every team member to mak...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/db.mdx
[locale-violation] ~28-~28: In American English, ‘afterward’ is the preferred variant. ‘Afterwards’ is more commonly used in British English and other dialects.
Context: ...up -dThis container can be taken down afterwards withdocker-compose down`. --- ## 📖...(AFTERWARDS_US)
[style] ~88-~88: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...ations may require to truncate (delete) all of the data in the database. One cause of this...(ALL_OF_THE)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/env.mdx
[locale-violation] ~131-~131: In American English, ‘afterward’ is the preferred variant. ‘Afterwards’ is more commonly used in British English and other dialects.
Context: ...d then providing it in the.envfile. Afterwards, don't forget to include an example (no...(AFTERWARDS_US)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/utils.mdx
[style] ~46-~46: Generally speaking, “themself” is only acceptable when referring to a singular entity (such as the singular usage of “they”, which is the preferred pronoun for many non-binary people). If “themself” refers to a plural entity (such as “everybody”, or the standard usage of “they”), you should use “themselves”.
Context: ... should be handled within the functions themself. The library does not perform any addit...(THEMSELF)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/knowledge-base/meta.json (1)
3-3: LGTM! Verify the new icon's appearance in the UI.The change from "Library" to "BookOpenText" for the icon is appropriate and aligns well with the concept of a knowledge base. The JSON structure remains valid.
To ensure the change has the desired effect, please verify the appearance of the new icon in the UI:
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/meta.json (2)
1-5: LGTM! The structure aligns well with the PR objectives.The JSON structure effectively organizes the documentation for the new modularized libraries. The title, icon, and pages are appropriately set to represent the Libraries section.
4-4: Please clarify the purpose of "utils" and "template" pages.The PR objectives didn't mention "utils" and "template" libraries. Could you provide more information about these?
- Is "utils" a planned library for utility functions?
- Is "template" a placeholder for future libraries or a template for creating new libraries?
This information will help ensure the documentation structure accurately reflects the project's current state and future plans.
apps/docs/src/content/docs/meta.json (1)
8-9: LGTM: Change aligns with PR objectives.The replacement of "knowledge-base" with "libraries" in the
pagesarray accurately reflects the PR's focus on introducing modularized libraries. This change ensures that the documentation structure is consistent with the new codebase organization.apps/docs/src/app/docs/source.ts (1)
8-9: LGTM: Icon imports updated correctlyThe changes to the icon imports are consistent with the PR objectives. The
KnowledgeBaseIconhas been updated toBookOpenText, and a newLibrariesIconhas been added, which aligns with the introduction of the new "Libraries" page.apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/utils.mdx (2)
6-33: LGTM: Comprehensive overview and clear usage example.The overview section effectively explains the purpose of the utils library, its key features, and provides a clear usage example. The callout about niche functions is particularly helpful in defining the library's scope.
51-65: LGTM: Clear and helpful commands section.The Commands section provides useful information for developers working with the library. The commands for viewing all project details and focusing on library usage are well-explained and relevant.
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/auth.mdx (1)
57-71: LGTM! Clear and helpful command documentation.The Commands section effectively provides useful commands for developers working with the library. The use of titled code blocks enhances readability and makes it easy for users to copy and run the commands.
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/api.mdx (1)
63-77: LGTM! Clear and useful commands provided.The Commands section provides helpful instructions for developers to view all commands and focus on library usage. The use of
pnpm nxis consistent with the project's monorepo setup using Nx.apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/db.mdx (1)
1-124: Overall assessment: Good foundation, room for improvementThis documentation provides a solid foundation for users of the db library. It covers essential topics such as overview, API reference, commands, contributing guidelines, FAQs, and troubleshooting. However, there are several areas where it could be enhanced:
- Expand the API Reference section with more details and examples.
- Address the lack of error handling in the library.
- Add more comprehensive contributing guidelines.
- Expand the FAQs section with more common questions.
- Enhance the Troubleshooting section with more detailed information and solutions.
Additionally, there are a few minor formatting issues that should be addressed, particularly with link formatting.
By implementing these suggestions, the documentation will become more comprehensive and user-friendly, providing better support for developers using the db library.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[locale-violation] ~28-~28: In American English, ‘afterward’ is the preferred variant. ‘Afterwards’ is more commonly used in British English and other dialects.
Context: ...up -dThis container can be taken down afterwards withdocker-compose down`. --- ## 📖...(AFTERWARDS_US)
[style] ~88-~88: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...ations may require to truncate (delete) all of the data in the database. One cause of this...(ALL_OF_THE)
apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/index.mdx (2)
1-5: LGTM: Frontmatter is well-structuredThe YAML frontmatter is correctly formatted and provides appropriate metadata for the page, including title, description, and icon.
1-432: Overall assessment: Valuable resource with room for structural improvementsThis document provides an extensive collection of resources covering various aspects of software development, which is highly valuable for developers at different skill levels. The content is well-organized into thematic sections, making it easy for users to find resources relevant to their interests or needs.
Main points for improvement:
- Enhance accessibility and SEO by adding descriptions to Card components.
- Improve clarity of section titles and add introductory text for context.
- Balance the number of resources across sections and consider subcategorization for larger sections.
- Ensure consistency in presentation and information provided for each resource.
- Add mechanisms for keeping the resource list up-to-date and allowing user contributions.
Implementing these suggestions will significantly enhance the document's usefulness and user-friendliness, making it an even more valuable resource for the development community.
| @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ | |||
| "--- Categories ---", | |||
| "tools-overview", | |||
| "contribution-guidelines", | |||
| "knowledge-base" | |||
| "knowledge-base", | |||
| "libraries" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding specific library entries to the documentation structure.
While adding "libraries" to the documentation structure aligns with the PR objectives, consider expanding this to include specific entries for each of the introduced libraries (@cuhacking/env, @cuhacking/db, @cuhacking/auth, @cuhacking/api). This would provide a more granular and navigable documentation structure, making it easier for users to find information about each specific library.
Here's a suggested expansion of the pages array:
{
"root": true,
"pages": [
"index",
"--- Categories ---",
"tools-overview",
"contribution-guidelines",
- "libraries"
+ "libraries",
+ "--- Libraries ---",
+ "libraries/env",
+ "libraries/db",
+ "libraries/auth",
+ "libraries/api"
]
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "libraries" | |
| "libraries", | |
| "--- Libraries ---", | |
| "libraries/env", | |
| "libraries/db", | |
| "libraries/auth", | |
| "libraries/api" |
| @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ import { createElement } from 'react' | |||
| import { | |||
| GitPullRequestCreateArrow as ContributionGuidelinesIcon, | |||
| Dock as HomeIcon, | |||
| Library as KnowledgeBaseIcon, | |||
| BookOpenText as KnowledgeBaseIcon, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
KnowledgeBaseIcon usage not updated in pages array
The import for KnowledgeBaseIcon has been updated to BookOpenText, but its usage in the pages array within apps/docs/src/app/docs/source.ts still references KnowledgeBaseIcon. Please update the pages array to use the new BookOpenText icon.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify KnowledgeBaseIcon usage in pages array
The import for KnowledgeBaseIcon has been updated from Library to BookOpenText. However, the usage of this icon in the pages array is not visible in the provided code snippet.
Please run the following script to verify that the KnowledgeBaseIcon is correctly used in the pages array:
If the script doesn't return any results, please update the pages array to use the new KnowledgeBaseIcon.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify KnowledgeBaseIcon usage in pages array
# Test: Search for KnowledgeBaseIcon usage in the file
rg --type typescript 'icon:\s*KnowledgeBaseIcon' apps/docs/src/app/docs/source.ts
Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify KnowledgeBaseIcon usage in pages array
# Search for KnowledgeBaseIcon usage in the pages array within source.ts
rg 'icon:\s*KnowledgeBaseIcon' apps/docs/src/app/docs/source.ts
Length of output: 94
|
|
||
| ### Error Handling | ||
|
|
||
| Errors should be handled within the functions themself. The library |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct grammar: Use "themselves" instead of "themself".
The sentence currently reads:
"Errors should be handled within the functions themself."
Since "functions" is plural, the correct reflexive pronoun to use is "themselves". Please update the sentence to:
"Errors should be handled within the functions themselves."
This change ensures grammatical correctness and clarity in the documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~46-~46: Generally speaking, “themself” is only acceptable when referring to a singular entity (such as the singular usage of “they”, which is the preferred pronoun for many non-binary people). If “themself” refers to a plural entity (such as “everybody”, or the standard usage of “they”), you should use “themselves”.
Context: ... should be handled within the functions themself. The library does not perform any addit...(THEMSELF)
| ## 📖 API Reference | ||
|
|
||
| ### `api` Function | ||
|
|
||
| - **Description**: Function containing all API procedures to the server. | ||
| - **Parameters**: Depending on the procedure defined. | ||
| - **Return Type**: Promise depending on the procedure return type. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Error Handling | ||
|
|
||
| Errors should be handled properly within each API route procedure. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the API Reference section with more details and examples.
While the API Reference section provides basic information, it could be more comprehensive to better assist users.
Consider the following improvements:
- Expand the description of the
apifunction with examples of different procedure types (query, mutation, subscription). - Provide more detailed information about the parameters and return types, possibly with TypeScript interfaces.
- Enhance the error handling section with best practices, common error types, and examples of how to handle them effectively.
Example addition for error handling:
try {
const result = await api.user.someProtectedProcedure()
// Handle successful result
} catch (error) {
if (error instanceof TRPCError) {
// Handle TRPC specific errors
console.error(`TRPC Error: ${error.code}`, error.message)
} else {
// Handle other types of errors
console.error('Unexpected error:', error)
}
}| ## 📝 Contributing | ||
|
|
||
| ### Best Practices | ||
|
|
||
| #### Code Formatting | ||
|
|
||
| Include instructions or links to code style guides, like Prettier/ESLint. | ||
|
|
||
| The library should be linted without any errors: | ||
| ```sh title="Terminal" | ||
| pnpm nx run api:lint | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| #### Testing | ||
|
|
||
| To run tests for this library: | ||
| ```sh title="Terminal" | ||
| pnpm nx run api:test | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the Contributing section with more specific guidelines.
The Contributing section provides basic information, but it could be more comprehensive to better guide contributors.
Consider the following improvements:
- Provide specific instructions or links to the project's Prettier/ESLint configuration.
- Add information about the project's commit message conventions, if any.
- Include guidelines for creating and naming new procedures or routers.
- Mention any specific testing requirements or conventions (e.g., test file naming, coverage expectations).
Example addition:
### Commit Message Guidelines
We follow the [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) specification. Please format your commit messages as follows:
[optional scope]:
[optional body]
[optional footer(s)]
Types: `feat`, `fix`, `docs`, `style`, `refactor`, `perf`, `test`, `chore`
| ## 🛑 Troubleshooting | ||
|
|
||
| ### Common Errors | ||
|
|
||
| #### Migration could not be completed | ||
|
|
||
| If this happens, a last resort solution would be to delete the docker container & its volume, | ||
| and attempt a migration once again. | ||
|
|
||
| For more troubleshooting, see DrizzleORM's [https://orm.drizzle.team/kit-docs/faq](troubleshooting page) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the Troubleshooting section and fix link formatting.
The Troubleshooting section provides some basic information but could be improved:
- Expand on common errors and their solutions. Consider adding more specific error messages and their resolutions.
- Clearly mark the suggestion to delete the docker container as a last resort, and provide steps to try before resorting to this option.
Fix the link formatting in the last line:
-For more troubleshooting, see DrizzleORM's [https://orm.drizzle.team/kit-docs/faq](troubleshooting page)
+For more troubleshooting, see DrizzleORM's [troubleshooting page](https://orm.drizzle.team/kit-docs/faq)Consider restructuring this section to provide a more comprehensive troubleshooting guide. For example:
## 🛑 Troubleshooting
### Common Errors
#### 1. Migration could not be completed
**Symptoms:**
- Describe what users might see when this error occurs
**Possible causes:**
- List potential reasons for this error
**Solutions:**
1. First, try...
2. If that doesn't work, attempt...
3. As a last resort, delete the docker container & its volume, and attempt a migration once again:docker-compose down -v
docker-compose up -d
pnpm nx run db:migrate
#### 2. [Another common error]
...
For more troubleshooting, see DrizzleORM's [troubleshooting page](https://orm.drizzle.team/kit-docs/faq)
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| You can also run multiple targets: | ||
|
|
||
| ```sh title="Terminal" | ||
| nx run-many -t <target1> <target2> | ||
| pnpm nx run-many -t <target1> <target2> | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typographical error.
There's a minor typographical error in this line: two consecutive dots are used where only one is needed.
Please apply the following change:
-..or add `-p` to filter specific projects
+...or add `-p` to filter specific projectsCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~349-~349: Two consecutive dots
Context: ...nx run-many -t ``` ..or add-pto filter specific projects ...(DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION)
| ### 👩💻 Join the Dark Side (be warned, there is no turning back) | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Windows Subsystem for Linux"} | ||
| href={`https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/install`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card title={"Linux Journey"} href={`https://linuxjourney.com/`} /> | ||
| <Card title={"Vim-Racer"} href={`https://vim-racer.com/`} /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"SurfingKeys"} | ||
| href={`https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/surfingkeys/gfbliohnnapiefjpjlpjnehglfpaknnc`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card title={"ShortcutFoo"} href={`https://www.shortcutfoo.com/`} /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"LazyVim for Ambitious Developers"} | ||
| href={`https://lazyvim-ambitious-devs.phillips.codes/`} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Cards> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider revising section title and adding introductory text
The current title "Join the Dark Side" uses humor but might be confusing or off-putting to some users. It's also not immediately clear what these resources are for without prior context.
Consider the following changes:
- Update the title to be more descriptive, e.g., "Advanced Development Tools and Practices"
- Add a brief introductory paragraph explaining the purpose of these resources
For example:
### 🚀 Advanced Development Tools and Practices
The following resources introduce powerful but potentially challenging tools and practices that can significantly enhance your development workflow. While they may have a steeper learning curve, mastering these can greatly improve your productivity and code quality.
<Cards>
...
</Cards>This change would provide clearer context for users and improve the overall structure of the document.
| /> | ||
| <Card title={"UI Patterns"} href={`https://ui-patterns.com/`} /> | ||
| <Card title={"FFFuel.co SVG Generator"} href={`https://www.fffuel.co/`} /> | ||
| </Cards> | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🎬 GitHub Actions | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Awesome Actions"} | ||
| href={`https://github.com/sdras/awesome-actions`} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Cards> | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🤖 AI/ML Tools | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card title={"Tensor Flow"} href={`https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials`} /> | ||
| <Card title={"PyTorch"} href={`https://pytorch.org/tutorials/`} /> | ||
| <Card title={"SKLearn"} href={`https://scikit-learn.org/stable/index.html`} /> | ||
| <Card title={"Kaggle"} href={`https://www.kaggle.com/`} /> | ||
| </Cards> | ||
|
|
||
| ### 📊 Data Science Libraries | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Matplotlib"} | ||
| href={`https://matplotlib.org/stable/tutorials/index`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card title={"Seaborn"} href={`https://seaborn.pydata.org/`} /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Pandas"} | ||
| href={`https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/user_guide/index.html`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card title={"NumPy"} href={`https://numpy.org/learn/`} /> | ||
| </Cards> | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🔒 CyberSci Resources | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card title={"picoCTF"} href={`https://picoctf.org/about.html`} /> | ||
| </Cards> | ||
|
|
||
| ### 🆓 Free Stuff | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"GitHub Student Developer Pack"} | ||
| href={`https://education.github.com/pack/offers`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Figma for Students"} | ||
| href={`https://www.figma.com/education/`} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Cards> | ||
|
|
||
| ### 💻 GitHub Resource Repos | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Web Dev Resources"} | ||
| href={`https://github.com/iamismile/web-dev-resources`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Evergreen Skills for Software Developers"} | ||
| href={`https://github.com/romenrg/evergreen-skills-developers`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Kickstart Coding Cheatsheets"} | ||
| href={`https://github.com/kickstartcoding/cheatsheets?tab=readme-ov-file`} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Cards> | ||
|
|
||
| ### 📖 Articles & Blogs | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"How to Mentor a Junior Developer: Ultimate Guide"} | ||
| href={`https://www.codium.ai/blog/how-to-mentor-a-junior-developer-ultimate-guide/`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card title={"Martin Fowler"} href={`https://martinfowler.com/`} /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"The Engineer's Complete Guide to Technical Debt"} | ||
| href={`https://www.stepsize.com/blog/complete-guide-to-technical-debt?utm_source=dev.to&utm_medium=referral`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"The 3 Laws of Writing Readable Code"} | ||
| href={`https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AzSRHiV9Cc&ab_channel=KantanCoding`} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Cards> | ||
|
|
||
| ### 📽️ Must-watch YouTube Videos | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"The ultimate guide to web performance"} | ||
| href={`https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fONene3OIA&t=211s&pp=ygUmdGhlIHVsdGltYXRlIGd1aWRlIHRvIHdlYiBwZXJmb3JtYW5jZSA%3D`} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Cards> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Suggestions for overall document improvements
The document provides a comprehensive list of valuable resources. Here are some suggestions to enhance its structure and usefulness:
-
Consistency in section size: Some sections have many resources while others have only a few. Consider balancing the number of resources in each section or grouping smaller sections together.
-
Add introductory text: For each section, consider adding a brief introduction explaining the importance or relevance of the resources listed.
-
Categorization: With the large number of resources, consider adding subcategories within larger sections to help users navigate more easily.
-
Resource vetting: Ensure all links are up-to-date and still relevant. Consider adding last-verified dates for each resource.
-
User contribution: Consider adding information on how users can contribute additional resources or suggest updates.
Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions for the "Front-End Drill/Practice" section:
### ✨ Front-End Development Resources
Front-end development is a crucial skill in web development. The following resources offer various ways to practice and improve your front-end skills, from coding challenges to project-based learning.
#### 🏋️ Practice Platforms
<Cards>
<Card
title={"Frontend Mentor"}
href={`https://www.frontendmentor.io/`}
description={"Real-world HTML, CSS and JavaScript challenges whilst working to professional designs"}
lastVerified={"2023-12-01"}
/>
<Card
title={"Great FrontEnd"}
href={`https://www.greatfrontend.com/`}
description={"Frontend interview preparation platform with real-world questions"}
lastVerified={"2023-12-01"}
/>
</Cards>
#### 🛠️ Project-Based Learning
<Cards>
<Card
title={"Frontend Practice"}
href={`https://www.frontendpractice.com/`}
description={"Improve your frontend skills by practicing on real-world designs"}
lastVerified={"2023-12-01"}
/>
</Cards>
// ... more subcategories as needed
Have a resource to add or update? [Open an issue](https://github.com/your-repo/issues/new) with your suggestion!Applying similar structures to other sections would greatly enhance the document's usability and value to readers.
| ### 💡 Hackathon Platforms | ||
|
|
||
| <Cards> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Software for Hackathons - MLH"} | ||
| href={`https://guide.mlh.io/organizer-resources/software-for-hackathons`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card title={"hackathon"} href={`https://github.com/kaiiyer/hackathon`} /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Awesome Hackathon"} | ||
| href={`https://github.com/dribdat/awesome-hackathon?tab=readme-ov-file`} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Card title={"HackMcGill"} href={`https://github.com/hackmcgill`} /> | ||
| <Card title={"hackerAPI"} href={`https://docs.mchacks.ca/`} /> | ||
| <Card title={"TESC Events"} href={`https://github.com/UCSDTESC/Check-in`} /> | ||
| <Card | ||
| title={"Carol Chu HtN"} | ||
| href={`https://www.carolchu.ca/hacker-apps-2020`} | ||
| /> | ||
| </Cards> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding descriptions to Cards for improved accessibility and SEO
While the current structure is clean and functional, adding brief descriptions to each Card component could enhance accessibility and SEO. This would provide users with more context about each resource before clicking.
Consider updating the Card components to include a description. For example:
<Card
title={"Software for Hackathons - MLH"}
href={`https://guide.mlh.io/organizer-resources/software-for-hackathons`}
+ description={"A comprehensive guide to software tools for organizing hackathons"}
/>Apply this pattern to all Card components throughout the document for consistency.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice, great stuff 👏
I did a skimming pass just to get familiar with this area, and definitely didn't catch everything. Not being too nitpicky at the moment since we need to start using this to discover the best practices.
Noticed some config stuff that can be cleaned up and it'll probably be best for me to rambo through it all in one pass in a separate PR rather than hold this up longer. This will also get me to become more familiar with this area and share ownership so I can help others.
For the docs stuff, I'll let you make the call on whether you want to prioritize speed and leave them for external contributors and do them in this PR.
| @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| title: env | |||
| description: Type-safe environment variable provider. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice. Optionally, Fumadocs has a component for this you can use.
|
|
||
| ### View all commands | ||
|
|
||
| To view all commands from the library's `project.json`, `package.json` and inheritted: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo on 'inheritted', we could leave it in if you want so that people can get an easy contribution 🤷
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## ❓ FAQs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can use the Accordion component for this
|
|
||
| ### What it does | ||
|
|
||
| This library holds the schemas and commands for making and using the database using DrizzleORM and Drizzle-Kit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You can hyperlink 'DrizzleORM' and 'Drizzle-Kit', saves people a bit of time if they're interested in learning more.
|
|
||
| ### What it does | ||
|
|
||
| This library is the authentication layer using [Lucia Auth](https://lucia-auth.com/). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TODO: Replace NextAuth in Tools Overview
| @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | |||
| import type { NextRequest } from 'next/server' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TODO: Come up with a convention so that we can sort these imports with ESlint
| @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | |||
| # auth | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can populate these READMEs and then render them on our docs via linking, up to you
| "@remix-run/node": "^2.8.1", | ||
| "@remix-run/react": "^2.8.1", | ||
| "@remix-run/serve": "^2.8.1", | ||
| "@t3-oss/env-nextjs": "^0.11.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are we sure we need all these as dependencies instead of devdependencies?
MFarabi619
force-pushed
the
jowi/feat/94-adr-create-modularized-libraries
branch
from
2e5d82e
to
3f88288
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/db/drizzle.config.ts (1)
1-12: Align implementation with PR objectives for modularization and type safety.While this configuration file is a good start for the
@cuhacking/dblibrary mentioned in the PR objectives, it doesn't fully align with the stated goals:
- The PR mentions using
@cuhacking/envfor type-safe environment variables, but this isn't fully implemented in the current code.- The hardcoded database URL goes against the modular and secure approach described in the objectives.
To fully align with the PR objectives:
- Uncomment and utilize the
@cuhacking/envimport.- Use the imported environment variables for database configuration.
- Ensure that the
@cuhacking/envpackage is properly set up with Zod for type safety.These changes will enhance the modularity, type safety, and security of the database configuration, as intended in the PR objectives.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/template.mdx (1 hunks)
- libs/db/drizzle.config.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/docs/src/content/docs/libraries/template.mdx
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | |||
| import { defineConfig } from 'drizzle-kit' | |||
|
|
|||
| // import { envWebsiteDb } from "@cuhacking/env"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Uncomment and utilize the environment import for security.
The commented-out import suggests that environment variables should be used for configuration. Uncomment and utilize this import to securely manage your database credentials.
Apply this change:
-// import { envWebsiteDb } from "@cuhacking/env";
+import { envWebsiteDb } from "@cuhacking/env";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // import { envWebsiteDb } from "@cuhacking/env"; | |
| import { envWebsiteDb } from "@cuhacking/env"; |
| dbCredentials: { | ||
| url: `postgresql://postgres:password@localhost:5432/hackathon`, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace hardcoded database URL with environment variable.
Using a hardcoded database URL in the configuration file is a security risk. Instead, use the environment variable from the @cuhacking/env package.
Apply this change:
dbCredentials: {
- url: `postgresql://postgres:password@localhost:5432/hackathon`,
+ url: envWebsiteDb.DATABASE_URL,
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| dbCredentials: { | |
| url: `postgresql://postgres:password@localhost:5432/hackathon`, | |
| }, | |
| dbCredentials: { | |
| url: envWebsiteDb.DATABASE_URL, | |
| }, |
| schema: './libs/db/src/schema/index.ts', | ||
| out: './drizzle', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use absolute paths for schema and output directories.
Using relative paths for schema and out can lead to inconsistencies depending on where the script is run from. Consider using absolute paths to ensure reliability.
Apply these changes:
+import path from 'path';
export default defineConfig({
dialect: 'postgresql',
- schema: './libs/db/src/schema/index.ts',
- out: './drizzle',
+ schema: path.resolve(__dirname, './src/schema/index.ts'),
+ out: path.resolve(__dirname, '../../drizzle'),
// ... rest of the config
})Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ | |||
| import { auth } from './auth' | |||
|
|
|||
| describe('auth', () => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm so confused lol, how is this working? As in like, where are the testing config files coming from? I'm assuming this is Vitest, but like how is this even possible?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The configs are coming from vite.config.ts file in each libraries, which can later be abstracted into a config library
| "name": "@cuhacking/env", | ||
| "type": "module", | ||
| "version": "0.0.1", | ||
| "private": "false", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
did you look into this @JowiAoun?
libs/api/eslint.config.js
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My understanding is that we don't even need this file here. Have you double-checked what happens when you just delete this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MFarabi619 will look into it, but it's required to run linting for now
pnpm exec nx generate @nx/js:library --name=env --directory=libs/env --importPath=@cuhacking/env --publishable=true --projectNameAndRootFormat=as-provided --unitTestRunner=vitest --no-interactive build(api/env): change package type to module
pnpm exec nx generate @nx/js:library --name=db --directory=libs/db --importPath=@cuhacking/db --publishable=true --projectNameAndRootFormat=as-provided --unitTestRunner=vitest --no-interactive build(api/db): change package type to module
pnpm exec nx generate @nx/js:library --name=api --directory=libs/api --importPath=@cuhacking/api --publishable=true --projectNameAndRootFormat=as-provided --unitTestRunner=vitest --no-interactive build(api/api): change package type to module
pnpm add drizzle-orm postgres pnpm add -D drizzle-kit
Unecessary bloat to build times in pipelines
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/BUILD.yml (1)
Playwright is still actively used in the project.
Despite removing the Playwright Browsers installation step from the workflow, Playwright remains a development dependency and is referenced in several test files and scripts. This discrepancy may lead to build or test failures.
Dependencies:
@playwright/testis listed indevDependencieswith version^1.36.0.Scripts:
postinstall:pnpx playwright installImports:
- Multiple test files import from
@playwright/test, e.g.,import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test'.Please ensure that Playwright is no longer required for testing before removing its installation step to avoid disrupting the build and test processes.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-41: Clarify removal of Playwright Browsers installation.The step for installing Playwright Browsers has been removed from the workflow. Could you please clarify:
- Has the testing strategy changed?
- Are browser-based tests no longer part of the build process?
- How is the removal of Playwright impacting the overall testing coverage?
Ensure that this removal doesn't create gaps in the testing process.
To verify the impact of removing Playwright, run:
HasithDeAlwis
force-pushed
the
jowi/feat/94-adr-create-modularized-libraries
branch
from
8675034
to
c8325aa
Compare
MFarabi619
force-pushed
the
jowi/feat/94-adr-create-modularized-libraries
branch
from
abf01ba
to
b51132f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/BUILD.yml (2)
34-35: LGTM: New step for building documentation added.The addition of a separate step for building documentation is a good practice, especially for modularized libraries. It ensures that the documentation is always up-to-date with the latest changes.
Consider caching the build output of the docs to speed up subsequent workflow runs. You can use GitHub Actions cache for this purpose. Here's an example of how you might implement this:
- uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: | .nx/cache dist/docs key: ${{ runner.os }}-nx-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}-${{ github.sha }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-nx-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}- ${{ runner.os }}-nx- - name: 📚 Build Docs run: pnpm nx build docs --verboseThis caching step should be added before the 'Build Docs' step.
37-38: LGTM: New step for building website added.The addition of a separate step for building the website is consistent with the modular approach and the previous 'Build Docs' step.
Similar to the 'Build Docs' step, consider caching the build output of the website to speed up subsequent workflow runs. You can use GitHub Actions cache for this purpose. Here's an example of how you might implement this:
- uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: | .nx/cache dist/website key: ${{ runner.os }}-nx-website-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}-${{ github.sha }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-nx-website-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}- ${{ runner.os }}-nx-website- - name: 🌐 Build Website run: pnpm nx build website --verboseThis caching step should be added before the 'Build Website' step.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/BUILD.yml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/BUILD.yml (4)
10-10: LGTM: Job name accurately reflects its purpose.The job name change from 'release' to 'build' better aligns with the actual purpose of this workflow, which is to build the projects. This change improves clarity and consistency with the workflow name.
Line range hint
1-46: Overall, the changes to the BUILD workflow align well with the PR objectives.The modifications to this workflow reflect the move towards a more modularized structure, with separate build steps for docs, website, and portal. This aligns well with the PR objective of creating modularized libraries.
Key improvements:
- More accurate job naming ('build' instead of 'release')
- Separate build steps for different components (docs, website, portal)
- Use of secrets for sensitive information in the portal build
Suggestions for further improvement:
- Implement caching for build outputs to speed up subsequent runs
- Verify the necessity of environment variables in the build process vs. runtime
These changes contribute to a more maintainable and efficient CI process, supporting the development of modularized libraries that can be published to npm registries.
40-46: LGTM: New step for building portal added with proper security measures.The addition of a separate step for building the portal is consistent with the modular approach. The use of GitHub secrets for sensitive information is a good security practice.
Please verify that these environment variables are necessary for the build process and not just for runtime. If they are only needed at runtime, consider moving them to your deployment configuration instead. Run the following script to check for the usage of these environment variables in the build configuration:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the usage of environment variables in build configuration # Test: Search for the use of DATABASE_URL, AUTH_SECRET, GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID, and GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET in build files rg --type typescript --type javascript '(DATABASE_URL|AUTH_SECRET|GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID|GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET)' apps/portalIf the script doesn't return any matches in build-related files, consider removing these environment variables from the build step and ensuring they are properly set in your deployment environment.
20-20: Verify if shallow clone is sufficient for all tasks.The change to
fetch-depth: 1will speed up the checkout process by fetching only the latest commit. This is generally beneficial for build workflows.However, please ensure that no tasks in this workflow require git history (e.g., generating changelogs, certain types of tests). Run the following script to check for potential issues:
If the script returns any matches, review those steps to ensure they work correctly with a shallow clone.
✅ Verification successful
Shallow clone verification successful.
The change to
fetch-depth: 1does not affect any workflow tasks requiring full git history.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for git commands or tools that might require full history # Test: Search for git log commands or changelog generation tools rg --type yaml '(git log|changelog)' # Test: Check if any step uses actions that might require git history rg --type yaml 'uses:.*@v\d+(\.\d+)*$' -A 5Length of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for git commands or tools that might require full history # Test: Search for git log commands or changelog generation tools in YAML files rg --type yaml '(git log|changelog)' # Test: Check if any step uses actions that might require git history rg --type yaml 'uses:.*@v\d+(\.\d+)*$' -A 5Length of output: 2457
MFarabi619
force-pushed
the
jowi/feat/94-adr-create-modularized-libraries
branch
from
7bcd1c5
to
f36968f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
128-130: LGTM: New nx configuration added.A new
nxconfiguration has been added with an emptyincludedScriptsarray. This appears to be a placeholder for future script inclusions in the Nx workspace.Consider adding a comment or documentation to explain the purpose of this configuration and how it will be used in the future. This will help other developers understand its role in the project structure.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/docs/next.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/docs/next.config.mjs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
package.json (1)
Learnt from: JowiAoun PR: cuhacking/2025#113 File: package.json:124-125 Timestamp: 2024-09-19T00:36:53.716Z Learning: In this project, the linting process for any apps and libraries should not be modified or adjusted.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
package.json (5)
18-18: LGTM: New lint inspection script added.The new
lint:inspect-openscript complements the existinglint:inspectscript by opening the ESLint configuration inspection in a browser. This is useful for developers who want a more interactive way to inspect the ESLint configuration.
21-45: LGTM: New dependencies align with PR objectives.The added dependencies support the creation of modularized libraries as described in the PR objectives:
@lucia-auth/adapter-drizzleandluciafor the authentication library.drizzle-ormandpostgresfor the database library.@trpc/client,@trpc/react-query, and@trpc/serverfor the tRPC API.@t3-oss/env-nextjsandzodfor the environment library.These additions will enable the development of the described
@cuhacking/env,@cuhacking/db,@cuhacking/auth, and@cuhacking/apilibraries.
60-65: LGTM: Minor version updates for Nx packages.The updates to
@nx/jsand@nx/webto version 19.6.0 are minor version bumps. These updates likely include bug fixes or small improvements and help keep the development environment up-to-date.
91-91: LGTM: New devDependencies support development workflow.Two new devDependencies have been added:
drizzle-kit: This package is used for database migrations and schema management with Drizzle ORM, supporting the@cuhacking/dblibrary development.verdaccio: This lightweight private npm proxy registry aligns with the PR objective of enabling local package publishing for testing purposes.These additions will enhance the development and testing workflow for the modularized libraries.
Also applies to: 121-121
21-45: Review categorization of dependencies.A previous review raised a valid point about the categorization of dependencies. With the addition of several new packages, it's crucial to ensure that each dependency is correctly placed in either
dependenciesordevDependencies.Please review the newly added packages and confirm that:
- Packages required for the runtime execution of the libraries are in
dependencies.- Packages only needed for development, testing, or building are in
devDependencies.This categorization helps in creating leaner production builds and clearer dependency management.
| "*": "eslint --cache --fix" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider reverting the lint-staged configuration change.
The lint-staged configuration has been updated to run ESLint on all files. However, this change may conflict with the previous instruction not to modify the linting process for any apps and libraries.
Additionally, the current configuration might be too broad and could lead to performance issues. Consider reverting this change or providing justification for the modification.
If a change is necessary, a more specific configuration targeting only relevant file types might be more appropriate, as suggested in a previous review:
"lint-staged": {
"*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}": "eslint --cache --fix"
}Please review and adjust this configuration as needed, keeping in mind the project's linting requirements.
MFarabi619
force-pushed
the
jowi/feat/94-adr-create-modularized-libraries
branch
from
3cab7b9
to
75b33bc
Compare
|
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.1.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Create modularized libraries
This PR aims to create the initial modularized libraries to be used in all other apps.
These libraries are publishable to npm registries, and can be published locally with verdaccio.
Libraries of subject:
@cuhacking/envis a wrapper overt3-oss/nextjs-envto provide full type safety withzod@cuhacking/dbis the database library using DrizzleORM, containing schemas and initial user & session tables@cuhacking/authis the authentication library which uses Lucia@cuhacking/apiis the tRPC API on the server, which requires a tRPC library implementation on each package@cuhacking/utilsis the utility functions used by other libraries & appsCurrent Nx dependency graph:
Yipee! Modularized dependencies!
To run this, assuming you have
.envat the monorepo root:.envfile intoapp/portal. If you do not have it defined, runcp apps/hackathon/.env.example apps/portal/.envand fill in the variablesln -s apps/portal/.env libs/db/.envSummary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores