Skip to content

orchestrator: replace businessKey#306

Merged
ydayagi merged 1 commit intoredhat-developer:mainfrom
ydayagi:flpath1926
Jun 24, 2025
Merged

orchestrator: replace businessKey#306
ydayagi merged 1 commit intoredhat-developer:mainfrom
ydayagi:flpath1926

Conversation

@ydayagi
Copy link
Contributor

@ydayagi ydayagi commented Jan 21, 2025

FLPATH-2428
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FLPATH-2428

Hey, I just made a Pull Request!

✔️ Checklist

  • A changeset describing the change and affected packages. (more info)
  • Added or Updated documentation
  • Tests for new functionality and regression tests for bug fixes
  • Screenshots attached (for UI changes)

@rhdh-gh-app
Copy link

rhdh-gh-app bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Missing Changesets

The following package(s) are changed by this PR but do not have a changeset:

  • @red-hat-developer-hub/backstage-plugin-scaffolder-backend-module-orchestrator

See CONTRIBUTING.md for more information about how to add changesets.

Changed Packages

Package Name Package Path Changeset Bump Current Version
@red-hat-developer-hub/backstage-plugin-orchestrator-backend workspaces/orchestrator/plugins/orchestrator-backend patch v6.1.0
@red-hat-developer-hub/backstage-plugin-orchestrator-common workspaces/orchestrator/plugins/orchestrator-common patch v1.28.0
@red-hat-developer-hub/backstage-plugin-orchestrator workspaces/orchestrator/plugins/orchestrator patch v3.1.0
@red-hat-developer-hub/backstage-plugin-scaffolder-backend-module-orchestrator workspaces/orchestrator/plugins/scaffolder-backend-module-orchestrator none v0.3.4

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@ydayagi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ydayagi commented Jan 21, 2025

this is to be merged after we have an official OSL with the required changes (apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes#3810.)

category: instance.category,
state: instance.state,
description: instance.description,
businessKey: instance.businessKey,
Copy link

@gabriel-farache gabriel-farache Mar 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why isn't there assessmentInstanceId defined here? like for https://github.com/redhat-developer/rhdh-plugins/pull/306/files#diff-863d661b58ddfc134554cea4bf31465f4720f1c56accfc594368331bf13c52ccR145

Is it because the returned object was only used to send the request and as of know the buisnessKey is not given anymore but fetched directly from the DI so we do not need it?

duration: duration,
// @ts-ignore
workflowdata: variables?.workflowdata,
assessmentInstanceId: variables?.orchestratorAssessmentInstanceId as string,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

where is assessmentInstanceId used in the front-end? I am asking as now the request will return this new variable instead of businessKey but I do not see any changes on the FE plugin

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is why it is a draft PR. we need to wait for sonata to support it in official release and then someone will have to change the FE

@christoph-jerolimov christoph-jerolimov changed the title replace businessKey orchestrator: replace businessKey Mar 21, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity from the author. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If the PR was closed and you want it re-opened, let us know and we'll re-open the PR so that you can continue the contribution!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Apr 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Apr 21, 2025
@ydayagi ydayagi reopened this Apr 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Apr 22, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2025

This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity from the author. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If the PR was closed and you want it re-opened, let us know and we'll re-open the PR so that you can continue the contribution!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity from the author. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If the PR was closed and you want it re-opened, let us know and we'll re-open the PR so that you can continue the contribution!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jun 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jun 17, 2025
@ydayagi ydayagi reopened this Jun 24, 2025
@ydayagi ydayagi force-pushed the flpath1926 branch 3 times, most recently from d90b066 to a35467d Compare June 24, 2025 11:12
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Jun 24, 2025
@ydayagi ydayagi force-pushed the flpath1926 branch 2 times, most recently from c5ec28c to 5eb1456 Compare June 24, 2025 20:47
FLPATH-1926
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FLPATH-1926

Signed-off-by: Yaron Dayagi <ydayagi@redhat.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@ydayagi ydayagi merged commit a9a6095 into redhat-developer:main Jun 24, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
mfrancisc pushed a commit to mfrancisc/rhdh-plugins that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
FLPATH-1926
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FLPATH-1926

Signed-off-by: Yaron Dayagi <ydayagi@redhat.com>
elai-shalev pushed a commit to elai-shalev/rhdh-plugins that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2026
FLPATH-1926
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FLPATH-1926

Signed-off-by: Yaron Dayagi <ydayagi@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants