Skip to content

Conversation

dwffls
Copy link
Contributor

@dwffls dwffls commented Aug 28, 2025

As stated by issue #520 the splitting of node_name and namespace for the diagnostic messages sent to influxdb should be done on the status.name of the message instead of the status.hardware_id.
User still needing the hardware_id can find is as a field in influxdb.
Next to this the setting of "none" for unknown data has been removed as it is not part of the influxdb spec, now the field is not set.

Finally the readme of diagnostic_updater has been updated to reflect the parameters that are used for splitting the node name and namespace.

Daan Wijffels added 2 commits August 28, 2025 10:10
…gnostic message into its parts. User still needing the hardware_id can find is as a field in influxdb. Next to this the setting of "none" for unknown data has been removed as it is not part of the influxdb spec, now the field is not set.
@mergify mergify bot added the ros2 PR tackling a ROS2 branch label Aug 28, 2025
@dwffls dwffls force-pushed the remote_name_splitting branch from ce1ed78 to 1f0f3fb Compare August 28, 2025 08:39
@dwffls dwffls closed this Aug 28, 2025
@dwffls dwffls reopened this Aug 28, 2025
@dwffls
Copy link
Contributor Author

dwffls commented Aug 28, 2025

These last changes remove the send.agg parameter and add the aggregation of /diagnostic messages as stated in #520

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ros2 PR tackling a ROS2 branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant