-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
5. evaluation
Verna Koskinen edited this page Dec 17, 2015
·
1 revision
Extent 3 -Some points come from the actual robot and the idea of it.
The plan 3
Weekly reports 3 -1p/week
Demo 2
Final report 4 -The structure of the program and solutions made. Analysing the possible shortcomings.
Manual/building manual 3
Structures creativity 3 -Not just copied from the Internet
Structures functionality 6 -If the robot works with the code hand in hand
Structures suitability 3 -The robots structure will help accomplishing the task
Codes extent 4 -Enough of work
Clarity 3 -Comments, indentation, readability, variable names
Suitability 4 -The code does what it's suppose to
Error handling 2 -Is prepared to edge conditions, can recover from malfunction
Bugless 2 -General functionality is clean
Structure 5 -Object Oriented-programming, good classes,
short methods
Originality 4 -Own code, not just from the examples
Coverage 3 -Recognized all rational testing targets
Sensible 3 -Tested sensible cases
Good try -bonus max 4p (Really used some time and thinking even though the robot didn't work as planned)
- 1 day late
- max grade 4
- 3 days late
- max grade 2, -10 p
- more
- max grade 1, -15 p